Abigail Pereira Aranha 
1) The farce of the maternal figure, what remains 16 years later
Francis Bacon said, a phrase also attributed to Galileo Galilei, that "truth is the daughter of time, not of authority". There is an error in this phrase, an inversion: it's the truth, as part of the structure of the universe, that shapes the times; whoever is a child of time is, at most, the record of the triumph of truth over madness, vanity, farce and stupidity. But the author is right about truth not being the daughter of authority in the sense of formal power, because authority in the sense of respectability is daughter of truth, and whoever tries to be authority in this sense using authority in that other ends up being destroyed by history. How many kings and emperors died like this, as persons and even more as vanities! While kings and emperors who were crowned as chosen by deities became ruins, sometimes in destruction by other equally pretentious kings, some philosophies, sciences and technologies of that time have survived centuries or millennia to this day or have been recovered, because they were portions of the truth.
In this, I remember a text I published on Mother's Day 2010, "The wonderful mother, a feminazi farce"[01]. The coincidence of May 9th as Mother's Day will be next year, 2027, but I will now record the reflection. I'll start by saying that I remember what they told me in that May 2010. Whoever said that a mother doesn't have the purity of the Virgin Mary didn't have a mother. This didn't come only from lesbofeminist women and men, it also came from conservatives who called themselves antifeminists. Oh, and since I also disagreed with Lesbofeminism, I wasn't even a woman (the times were these too). And there were those who used my 19-year-old youth and my enjoyable lifestyle at the time as an argument against me. Today I'm almost twice the age and more than twice the life experience, including the life experience of whoredom, and what I said still stands. The mature women with their false arguments against what I said disappeared.
If before the elders achieved to be seen as the incarnation of wisdom and knowledge, today they have become ridiculous. Some are seen as symbols of stagnation in time, compulsive ignorance, useless poisonous chatter, and farce; others imitate young people in a somewhat caricatural way, because they realize that old age has overcome them (the old age of the past, not that of the body). The mystical image of the wise old person, whose knowledge of a lifetime surpasses literacy and the brain that does not have Alzheimer's disease, no longer persuades. They complain that they are no longer taken seriously, some of them (get this) using modern social media. Among these elders and their mental children from generations X[02] and Y[03], those who should have something to teach those from whom they must learn, are many mothers.
Let's see that today, almost 16 years later, some people today are the age that their mother was when I published that text. Going back another 16 years, we arrive at 1994. For us here, with our smartphones, laptops and desktops connected to the internet, that 1994, when, in Brazil, reading Folha de São Paulo in print and watching Globo Repórter on Friday nights were things for educated people, it was almost in the Middle Ages. Today, we still have remnants of those generations whose life expectancy was to copy their parents and grandparents, especially in a farce. But back in 1994, 16 or 32 years backward or forward was some time in which we saw the history happen. And as Generation Z[04] says, those who are real know who are fake.
16 years after that 2010, after I published that text demystifying the maternal figure, we can now see videos on YouTube about narcissistic mothers, some of them spoken by women. I prefer to avoid the word "narcissistic" so as not to be associated with the new fashion, and also because I think the word is kind of cute; I prefer to call her "lesbian", because it has the same meaning and is more offensive.
Some mothers may have thought that by separating their children from their fathers and defaming their fathers to their children, these children would kiss the ground that they walk on (or that a woman walks on). The opposite happened, because the child is naive, but doesn't hate the truth, and knows that those who are from the upper level don't need to put anyone down.
Let's not make mistake with the biological, hereditary and mental children of the Silent Generation[05] on the internet, as if they were the Silent Generation itself speaking. Let's remember where this Silent Generation was in 2010, or in 2005, when the youngest specimens were 60 years old. Where were the wise grandmothers when Brazil and the world advanced technologically and got bogged down socio-politically in LGBT-feminist Progressivism? Many elder women disparaged the internet, the increase in general schooling and the advance of urbanization, while they saw as progress the churches opening up to the elegant left, the attempts to repress prostitution and pornography, social assistance for scammers, alimony for swindler women, etc. They just didn't applaud internet censorship against those who criticized the female universe and the recent left because they didn't know the internet and didn't know who those being censored were. I highlight women because elderly men still tended to leave support and material possessions to their wives, children, and children's mothers outside of marriage. Elderly women are more concerned with consuming their husband's and parents' inheritance while riding on the success of their children.
And we saw, we already knew, that not every mother is a conservative woman inserted in a traditional family. Conservatives in general preached against LGBT-Feminism as if the very survival of the human species depended on preservation of traditional marriage with Christian moralism (or as close to it as exists today). But not only is the single mother a legally embraced figure, with the right to alimony from the child's father; the stable union has the legal value of traditional marriage, and requires much less laborious procedural evidence than a man presenting himself to the girl's parents planning the wedding; and to top it off, there are conservatives who see themselves as having a mission to fight for LGBT couples not to adopt children, because even they (LGBTs) want to. But, ironically, while the LGBTQIAPN+ Movement (or just TQIAPN+, because the LGB got cross with it[06]) and the feminist movement still preach that the family is oppressive and produces sexual repression of women, the same activism produces sexual repression. A home environment that has conservative rules of behavior shames a man for appearing heterosexual. A progressive home environment too, even if it's a heterosexual couple with their biological children. The old conservative mother induced in her daughters the idea that men thought about sex with them and, therefore, it was desirable to have less close contact with men and boys, if the environment was not reserved only for women and girls. The progressive mother encourages her daughter to use, if she has the option, Uber for women, pink buses, women-only gyms, etc. Oh, and so the sexual revolution of left-wing feminism went down in legend (at least the female heterosexual revolution). Progressives also believe that saving the family is healing society and the world, but the progressive's cure is the conservative's disease and vice versa.
And to this day I'm not a mother nor am I married. I guess me being a whore took its toll, but the other part is that it's dangerous for a man today to get married or have a child.
And once again, I stood firm for 16 years without having anything to unsay, other than some mistake in the perception or expression of the truth. And once again, I was there when some voices hadn't arrived yet, I continued when some faltered, and, by a personal luck, I managed to continue when some brave ones fell or had to withdraw.
2) "The wonderful mother, a feminazi farce" (May 09, 2010)[07]
Today (May 9, 2010) women will have the second day of the year in which they will be celebrated just for being women: Mother's Day.
Being a mother is not a certificate of maturity. It's almost always the opposite. Many times the distinguished woman became pregnant at the age of 15 or 17 with her first boyfriend because he one day didn't want to use a condom or she became pregnant later than that thinking that a woman's achievement is to be a mother.
A mother's love is a farce. Her father was the provider clown. If her partner is a good man, he is a fool to be a male provider and make children. Most likely, the father of her child is a scoundrel, because women in general despise men who are good (if they marry a good man at 25 or 30, that doesn't prove otherwise). Why will she start loving someone now?
A child for a woman is an investment. It's difficult for a woman to be intelligent, but she is almost always ingenious. The child is the one who will carry her on his or her back when she is old. The woman may be illiterate, but she wants her children to be educated. Is it because she know the value of History and Mathematics? No, she wants her child to have a degree so he or she can get a good salary and she can ride on his or her success. Although in the end, the distinguished woman often takes the child out of school (or doesn't even send it) so this child can sell candy at traffic lights or beg for alms. That's why even lesbians have children. That's why almost every woman has a child, wants to have a child or suffers because she doesn't have a child. Because a child for a woman is an investment.
A woman loses sexual interest in her partner after having a child. I've seen a scientific explanation for this but I don't remember what it is. But the real explanation is simple: the idiot who made the child is already in trouble and she can have sex with him when she wants (about 2 or 3 times a month).
And we know that some mothers live on alimony. Depending on the alimony, she can live without working and can spend the whole day kicking around, talking to bitches and messing around in other people's lives. And can spend the weekend nights hanging out with scoundrels. Milene Domingues, for example, earns or earned 10 thousand euros (more than R$ 23,000.00) in alimony from soccer player Ronaldinho's son[08]. She is earning more with a child than people who have a degree. And I've never seen a mother who receives an alimony raising her child properly (I'm not going to say it doesn't exist, but of the ones I know I haven't seen any). The poor son is left to be raised carelessly, is treated poorly, hears horrors about his father and sometimes even starves. It's like Clodovil said, women work lying down and rest standing up[09] (did you know they even threatened him with death for saying that?).
And where are the sexually repressed lesbians who call themselves feminists to protest against this sexist date? Yes, because what is more macho and ancient than saying that the best thing in a woman's life is to reproduce? Where are the people who on International Women's Day love to show women as discriminated against, as seen as objects, as those who are beaten by their husbands to say what I said just now? Oh, I know. They are receiving tribute, gifts and, the ones who have them, even a visit from their son who is in prison.
Oh, I almost forgot. If women have maternal instincts, why do feminist movements defend abortion?
In conclusion, maternal instinct is a fairy tale to inflate a mediocre women’s ego. The wonderful, divine, perfect mother is a myth. What about Father's Day? Did you know that in Scotland, the government has already banned Father's Day cards so as not to embarrass children of single mothers and of homosexuals[10]?
3) I already had the ideas in my head and...
A reader and friend shared a video on his VK profile, tagging me to comment[11]. I'll copy the original here[12]:
I'm going to start with a hypothesis that usually causes some strangeness, but which is philosophically very important: recognizing female evil is not necessarily an attack on women.
I know that modernity tends to treat the idea that women can be bad, as bad or more bad as men, as a taboo, because there is an assumption that they would be more benevolent, more empathetic, less violent than men. And this is a widespread idea, you will find it in all types of discourse, Christian, feminist, progressive, right-wing discourse, it doesn't matter. And it may seem, at first glance, like it's a compliment, wow, look how good the women are, but that's where the problem really starts.
Historically, this was not always the case. During much of Western civilization, women were not necessarily protected because they were more fragile, nor respected because they were more virtuous, I'm not saying that, but they were feared. Obviously, not because of physical strength, but because of a specifically feminine violence that is much more anchored in strategy, in dissimulation, in cunning, it is an intelligent violence. This was a commonplace in Antiquity, which believed that women were capable of acting, and also acting for evil.
But when modernity elevates women to these virtuous beings par excellence, good by nature, this action thing is lost. Hence all their actions are judged not morally, but as actions influenced by external agents. Then the woman does something that seems bad, or is actually bad, the explanation is not because she wanted to do it that way, but it is always a context.
At first, this may seem like a form of protection, but it ends up infantilizing. The symbolic effect of this is disastrous. Because that former feared, ambiguous figure, which literature ended up calling "femme fatale", becomes a permanent victim, an Ophelia, who dissolves herself in the water of circumstances.
Of course, there was hope that this moral elevation of women would be the catalyst for great and profound social transformations on an almost redemptive level. But this bet failed, we are seeing that violence continues, that this myth has lost its strength, and now even violence against women has become gender-based violence, like this, really generic.
The conclusion is uncomfortable, I know, but we can no longer ignore it: denying the existence of female evil, and transforming them into symbols of absolute morality is just another sophisticated way of disarming, of domesticating.
As I said before, I wrote that text to demystify the maternal figure in 2010. Still in 2010, I started the series "Machismo was created by women" (in Portuguese)[13]. In 2012, I started the series "The Little Boys Society" (in Portuguese)[14], in which I rough in an explanation of how mothers shape their society to their own convenience through their own children. For those who have not read either series, I anticipate that they are not bibliographical research. Because I wouldn't waste time trying to find historians, anthropologists, philosophers or psychologists saying about the feminine universe, in some book that wasn't burned, that which was only, so to speak, discovered now when the sewage of LGBT-Feminism leaked into the street and left a horrible stench.
From the beginning, one of my main objectives was to show what is a normal reasoning by and for a common citizen immersed in one’s normal life (some think it’s preaching Atheism and lust, or machismo and prostitution). Organized science is the organization of observable knowledge, and not the opposite, a ready-made doctrine presented by "spin doctors" that offends those who preserve common sense (which, not by chance, they mention as if it is the mistake of the uninitiated). There is no science or social development where intelligence is blasphemous if it belongs to the common citizen. And in the specific case of the female universe, it has always been a mystification, including of the maternal image, against observable reality, because even female appearance is something that is not the general rule of the female universe, I say this at the level of human history. The mystification was even exposed by some women when it was no longer possible to support it.
4) I still organized my ideas and...
I was on the YouTube homepage when Josué Aragão had made this post a few hours earlier[15]:
I have two daughters. One is 9 years old, the other is 3. They are my greatest treasure. Every day I follow the news from Brazil and the world. It's my job. But there comes a time when the economist disappears and only the father is left.
And at some moment in the middle of all this, the father looks at them and has one question that won't leave his mind: where will this end?
Year comes, year goes, and things only get worse. Nothing gets better. The tax burden does not fall. Salary does not keep up with prices. And the children who play on the floor today will be the taxpayers who will pay this bill tomorrow... who are our children.
I don't know if you've ever stopped to think about it. Not just as a citizen, or as a voter... but as a father, as a mother, as an uncle, as a grandfather. That child you love, who today doesn't know what IPCA[16] is, what public debt is, what tax reform is... one day he or she will feel all of this in his or her pocket. And this one will ask what we did while there was still time.
There's a song by the band Catedral that I've been listening to since I was a young man[17]. At the end, the vocalist sings a simple phrase that never left my head:
*"When the summer comes, I want a much better world for my daughter to play in."*
The 9-year-old already understands some things. Sometimes she asks me why things are like this in Brazil. Why is everything expensive? Why are there so many people living on the streets? Because we don't have to be afraid to walk the streets at night. And I need to respond without taking away her hope, but without lying either. I don't know if you've ever had a conversation like this with a child. It's one of the hardest things there is... because you want to protect, but you also have to prepare him or her for this crazy world.
My 3-years-old daughter still doesn't know anything. She just wants to play. And I want her to stay that way for as long as possible.
This weight of following Brazil every day... the numbers, the decisions, the scandals... knowing that these two girls will inherit what we build or destroy, is what makes me continue doing what I do. It's not easy. There are days when I don't want to do this. But I can't give up on them.
And then I ask you: do you look at a child you love and can you not to think about the Brazil he or she will live in? How do you deal with this? Do you still have hope?
Tell me here in the comments. I want to read every answer.
Yes, sometimes I look at a child and think about the future. But what worries me most is that if Brazil's future is one of greater economic, moral, artistic, and intellectual poverty, those born in 2015 or 2020 will hardly have anything to compare the culture in which they grew up to. Grandparents, fathers, and mothers generally don't know what public debt is, but they aren't interested in finding out, and they vote, often for those who offer benefits with public money. And what happens to the public debt when more and more people receive government benefits? That's where the question of the world we will leave for today's children comes in. It may still be possible to salvage good things from the past, like a life without CBDC, but we older generations will need moral and mental decency to face a context of greater political-ideological censorship and poverty of spirit; and the younger generations will have even greater difficulties.
There was a time when we talked about leaving a better world for our children. Before, there was talk of leaving our children to an old world. Now, the smartest and most virtuous people want to prevent their children from from having to spend their lives struggling to bring back the good parts of the past that they knew.
NOTES AND REFERENCES:
[01] [07] "A mãe maravilhosa, uma farsa feminazista", May 09, 2010, A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade, https://avezdasmulheres.blogspot.com/2010/05/a-mae-maravilhosa-uma-farsa-feminazista.html; and A Vez dos Homens que Prestam, https://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2010/05/mae-maravilhosa-uma-farsa-feminazista.html
[02] Generation X: born from 1965 to 1980
[03] Generation Y, or Millennial: born from 1981 to 1996
[04] Generation Z, or iGen: born from 1997 to 2010
[05] Silent Generation: born from 1928 to 1945
[06] For example: "LGB sem T: homossexuais anunciam ruptura com ativismo trans" (LGB without T: homosexuals announce break with trans activism). Gabriel Sestrem, Gazeta do Povo, September 28, 2025. https://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/vida-e-cidadania/lgb-sem-t-homossexuais-anunciam-ruptura-com-ativismo-trans
[08] "Ronaldo recorre na Espanha para baixar pensão do filho". Terra, November 26, 2009. https://www.terra.com.br/noticias/brasil/ronaldo-recorre-na-espanha-para-baixar-pensao-do-filho,330b1054a250b310VgnCLD200000bbcceb0aRCRD.html
[09] "Clodovil bate-boca na Câmara após frase sobre mulheres". Agência Estado, via Tribuna do Paraná, April 25, 2007. https://www.tribunapr.com.br/noticias/clodovil-bate-boca-na-camara-apos-frase-sobre-mulheres
[10] "Father's Day cards banned in Scottish schools". The Telegraph, June 22, 2008. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/2176315/Fathers-Day-cards-banned-in-Scottish-schools.html
[11] Kleber Lima, VK, April 18, 2026. https://vk.com/clip566336921_456239027
[12] olabocos, Instagram, December 30, 2025. https://www.instagram.com/olabocos/reel/DS5Xfv7CU3U
[13] In Réflexion et Temps Libre avec Abigail at https://avezdasmulheres2.blogspot.com/search/label/machismo-created-by-women, in Amélioration et Amusement des Hommes avec Abigail at https://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/search/label/machismo-created-by-women
[14] In Réflexion et Temps Libre avec Abigail at https://avezdasmulheres2.blogspot.com/search/label/little-boys-society, in Amélioration et Amusement des Hommes avec Abigail at https://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/search/label/little-boys-society
[15] Josué Aragão, YouTube, April 29, 2026. https://www.youtube.com/post/Ugkxgbl225cGDqokcNZDO2jGZvl_5umhE77b
[16] IPCA: Broad National Consumer Price Index (Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo). It's calculated by the IBGE (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics) and measures the variation in prices of products and services consumed by the population, based on a weighted average of prices in the largest cities in Brazil.
[17] "Quando o Verão Chegar" (When the Summer Comes), in "Catedral - O Sentido (CD COMPLETO)". MK Music, YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9LOdsnfVCw&t=4m59s
Questo testo in italiano senza video di dissolutezza in Réflexion et Temps Libre avec Abigail: "La madre meravigliosa, una farsa femminazista 2: la verità è la madre dei tempi", https://avezdasmulheres2.blogspot.com/2026/05/madre-meravigliosa-farsa-femminazista-2.html Questo testo in italiano con video di dissolutezza in Amélioration et Amusement des Hommes avec Abigail: "La madre meravigliosa, una farsa femminazista 2: la verità è la madre dei tempi", https://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2026/05/madre-meravigliosa-farsa-femminazista-2.html 
Ce texte en français sans vidéos de libertinage au Réflexion et Temps Libre avec Abigail: "La mère merveilleuse, une farce féminazie 2: la vérité est la mère des temps", https://avezdasmulheres2.blogspot.com/2026/05/mere-merveilleuse-farce-feminazie-2.html Ce texte en français avec vidéos de libertinage au Amélioration et Amusement des Hommes avec Abigail: "La mère merveilleuse, une farce féminazie 2: la vérité est la mère des temps", https://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2026/05/mere-merveilleuse-farce-feminazie-2.html 
Eso texto en español sin videos de putaría en Réflexion et Temps Libre avec Abigail: "La madre maravillosa, una farsa feminazista 2: la verdad es la madre de los tiempos", https://avezdasmulheres2.blogspot.com/2026/05/madre-maravillosa-farsa-feminazista-2.html Eso texto en español con videos de putaría en Amélioration et Amusement des Hommes avec Abigail: "La madre maravillosa, una farsa feminazista 2: la verdad es la madre de los tiempos", https://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2026/05/madre-maravillosa-farsa-feminazista-2.html 
This text in English without licentiousness videos at Réflexion et Temps Libre avec Abigail: "The wonderful mother, a feminazi farce 2: truth is the mother of the times", https://avezdasmulheres2.blogspot.com/2026/05/the-wonderful-mother-feminazi-farce-2.html This text in English with licentiousness videos at Amélioration et Amusement des Hommes avec Abigail: "The wonderful mother, a feminazi farce 2: truth is the mother of the times", https://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2026/05/the-wonderful-mother-feminazi-farce-2.html 
Texto original em português sem vídeos de putaria no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade: "A mãe maravilhosa, uma farsa feminazista 2: a verdade é a mãe dos tempos", https://avezdasmulheres.blogspot.com/2026/05/mae-maravilhosa-uma-farsa-feminazista-2.html Texto original em português com vídeos de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam: "A mãe maravilhosa, uma farsa feminazista 2: a verdade é a mãe dos tempos", https://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2026/05/mae-maravilhosa-uma-farsa-feminazista-2.html
