Abigail Pereira Aranha 
A great mistake of the right-wing is that many people within it treat the leftists like debaters from bad to mediocre in a normal lunchroom conversation. The trouble is that Socialism exists precisely to destroy the mental normality and to create a society that fuses stupidity with political-social life itself. The bourgeoisie of the French Revolution and the Communists of the Karl Marx epoch even had wrong things to fight against, and they fought against some of them. But the socialist movement also ended up fighting against what was left of decent, like when it turned the universities into sinecures for psychotic lesbians, parasitic militants with median IQ, and data counterfeiters. (...)
But when I say that the socialist movement produces a society based on stupidity, I am not saying that a little group of parasites and psychopaths with some power or money are making the rest of the population to be stupid. If someone like me or you who are reading can, at the very least, think that something is wrong around us, this already proves that a socialist elite can not even to make the rest of the population to have the worldview they want, even if contrary thoughts have almost no channels of expression. The case is more serious: insanity, folly, and hatred for truth have existed before it among the common people, the maximum that Socialism can be accused of is channeling them for its own benefit. This includes putting people in important positions not despite the lack of merit, but because of it.
I said this in my text "The Lucifer's concubines"[1]. This time, instead of addressing the concubines of Lucifer, I will address his reign. I'll start with some questions for you to think about. Why the presidential candidate of Brazil this year for the Workers' Party, who represented a government whose great merit was to continue or to steal the merit of actions of previous administrations, earned only in the first round more than 20% of the votes of the electorate, about 31 million votes? Why have we ever seen "progressives" in discussions on social networks cursing opponents of fat, homosexual or whore? Why, for example, does the Black Movement still have any visibility (and credibility) when practically no one black in the true Brazilian people seems to need it or even to take it seriously? Have you ever observed that to show how leftist militancy is demented, ridiculous, disguised, double standard and even criminal does not seem to bother it much, or to disrupt its actions, or even to undermine its credibility?
The ethical level of Brazil fell below the hypocrisy. A country of hypocrites pretends to obey a good moral code that it professes. Brazil now seems neither to conceive what a worthy moral principle is, and this is even worse than the time when "morality" was only to vilify or stifle (hetero)sexuality. For example, the protest against corruption and "privileges" in government and public service does not divide honests and cheaters, it divides, as someone said in 2006 on Orkut, Group 1 of those who benefit from public money and Group 2 of those who would like to be in Group 1. The time of Catholic-Protestant hypocrisy is still nostalgic, because the scoundrels, the weak and the libertines still professed and tried to stage a moral code that supposedly was valid for all. What we see today in Brazil and in the First World is an ethical caste system, in which one caste dispenses itself from following the pattern it requires of the other. This is noticeable in leftist collectives that use terms such as "false symmetry", which is almost this by definition, but it's more widespread than that.
A country is not made with criminals and people of bad character. But here's the problem: good character is not over, but it has become a lower class stigma. It is as if mischief, mendacity, incompetence and folly were the noble quarters of a great city, and the grandeur of character and grandeur of mind were the poorer suburbs of a smaller city in the metropolitan area.
I'll give an example of how this moral caste system works. Better, I'll use some variables that you can replace later. R(x) is an action R towards x (and R is a negative thing). N is a movement. N says that the collectivity, which is the entirety, practices R(B) and, thereby, impairs group B, which N represents. More precisely, it is a group C, which belongs to non-B, who practices R(B). But neither the collectivity nor the group C as a whole practices R(B), at least not since about 50 years. More, and here's the trick to success: pratically the whole group C repudiates R(B). The components of N are the union of B1, which is a subset of B, and C1, which is a subset of C. But N omit C1 or put it in the background. B1 accuses the collectivity of R(B), the collectivity cares about it and tries to show that it does not practice R(B). If N were militating in a collectivity that considers R(B) an acceptable thing, if not commendable, it would have a return from disregard at best to violence at worst. This would also be valid (and here I will not use variables because it is one of the crucial points of the exposition) if N were in a collectivity with majority of functional illiterates (who can read but can not interpret well what they read), mentally ills or lovers of stupidity. Therefore, N is manipulating the rest of group C (and even the rest of group B) to get what it wants. But, and now the moral caste system enters, the ethical standard of N is not the same of the collectivity in general, hence N can practice or accept R(C) and say that R exists only when C does R(B). But not only that. N also rejects or even attacks an individual of group B, which it claims to represent, when that individual denounces that N practices the same action R that it says to combat. But not only that. From the beginning, a moral virtue such as V, which is widely practiced or valued in the collectivity, is uncommon in N, sometimes it's even vilified when practiced by a person of B; or the contrary, the moral vice non-V which is much avoided or despised in the collectivity is common in N, sometimes it's even glorified when practiced by a person of B. And the functional illiteracy, the psychological uncontrol, the mental illness and the love of stupidity, which I quoted that would be obstacles to N's work if they were generalized in collectivity, can be problems accepted within N. And where I said that "N attacks an individual of group B", this was not necessarily a verbal discord; this can be physical violence, including murder or attempted murder (ops!, here I also did not use variables because I went through another crucial point of the exposition).
Let's replace the variables. We can make N equal to Black Movement, R equal to racism, group B equal to blacks, group C equal to whites and V equal to honest work[2]. We can make N equal to feminist movement, R equal to sexism, group B equal to women, group C equal to men and V equal to kindness[3].
We still have another thing in this moral caste system that may be more visible in Feminism: a behavior that the movement sells as a revolutionary, as a rebellion against the traditional order, can be said as a curse by members of the movement or of another leftist group. I've been called a whore and cum depository by feminist women, one of whom says she likes men (I'd even like to have dozens of men one... after another fucking me and ejaculating on my face and my breasts, but this is a movie thing, I only did it with 3 guys at most).
Some 30 years ago, even the far left knew that a minority was a group that, in addition to being numerically small, was powerful and oppressive. It is no coincidence or complete stupidity when left-wing movements say they represent a minority even when the supposed minority is more than half the population, such as blacks and mulattoes or women in Brazil. It is part of the very idea of representation that the representatives are in much smaller numbers than those represented. The minority is themselves, or the group they want to belong to, which is something like the elite of the Soviet Union. You may note that, for example, feminist groups do not even suggest that they represent conservative women.
And you from Brazil have already seen the indignation against 4 or 5 thousand murders of women and 200 or 400 murders of homosexuals in a country with 50 or 60 thousand homicides a year. Not only homicides, there are more words and repudiation against an alleged sexual harassment of a unique woman than against the number of homicide victims that year. This repudiation including who are not left-wing militants. The murder of a woman for a feminist or the murder of a homosexual for an LGBT militant is not the murder of a human being, it's a crime against an elite, the elite of which himself or herself wants to be a part. It is not because of the horrible school formation that a Brazilian thinks that 4 thousand homicides of women are more than 40 thousand homicides of men.
But if we see today blacks repudiating the Black Movement, non-heterosexuals repudiating the LGBT Movement, women repudiating Feminism, it is not because they perceived everything I said in my texts, or what some conservatives have published in texts and videos on the internet. The problem is that the leftist militancy made so much nonsense that it was no longer possible for mediocre people of the majority to dream of ascending to that minority. To explain it better with an example, the woman born in the 1970s could support or silence about Feminism in the 1990s because she had a project to take a university course and, at work, while earning a good salary, being protected from masculine sexual looks and personal criticism; but if she defends Feminism today, she will be seen as a semi-literate pseudo-intellectual, untrustworthy, unworthy of good coexistence, paranoid for lack (or excess) of cocks and member of a movement that women do not believe they need to give value or respect.
If leftist groups with a gross lack of intelligence, mental sanity and character have both formal political power and control of mass communication, we have a dramatic situation in which a person with mental integrity, intellectual qualification, and moral greatness is launched at least in invisibility, if not in impotence or execration. Have you ever noticed that there are already medium-sized texts that alone would destroy entire leftist movements, but these movements go on firmly gaining credibility? Have you ever noticed that some gross lies by leftist movements continue to be repeated and believed even after being overwhelmed by thousands of people? It is not just militant mass communication, sometimes speaking to a low IQ audience. It is the moral caste system, in which the dominant caste can be at the same time stupid, liar and believing in its own lie. This is a worrying point, in which I myself am trying to learn how to act: to prepare for a qualified debate with morally qualified people with normal reasoning is neither functional nor safe I do not say to deal with leftist movements or with those who command them, but even more so with the general public who often do not even care about politics or socialist militancy.
In order to not to close with sadness, I will try to show a solution, although I will go deeper into the problem. You must have heard an old person say that he or she became a righteous person because when he or she was still a child in the countryside, he or she worked and was punished by his or her parents. With this, a person does not learn ethics, learns that is too trash to be a scoundrel. And because he or she knows that is trash, is an honest person, a kind person, a man who respects women, etc. Hence, you can see that biblical characters who have had acts of greatness, such as Abigail (1 Sam 25: 2 to 39), Rahab (Jos 2) or Ebedmelech (Jer 38: 6 to 13), are barely known; or, like Elijah or Elisha, are remembered more because of the miracles than because of the prophecy. Therein, even calling on the name of God is trickery, stupidity or weakness. Against a social system in which power grows with iniquity and lack of merit, the only solution is to create a social environment in which the just and wise have decision-making power, means of action and self-esteem (who confuses this with a theocratic bureaucracy is already a living example of a community that does not even imagine someone who is not scoundrel, weak or idiot). By the way, divine justice itself as Christianity preaches would not even exist if God was not, besides just, powerful. The Bible says, Proverbs 29: 2: "When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn"[4].
NOTES AND REFERENCES:
[1] "The Lucifer's concubines", December 25, 2016, Réflexion et Temps Libre avec Abigail, http://avezdasmulheres2.blogspot.com/2016/12/the-lucifer-concubines.html; and Amélioration et Amusement des Hommes avec Abigail, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2016/12/the-lucifers-concubines.html.
[2] Black Movement says that the collectivity practices racism against blacks and, thereby, impairs the blacks, which Black Movement represents. More precisely, are the whites who practices racism against blacks. But neither the collectivity nor the whites as a whole practices racism against blacks, at least not since about 50 years. More, and here's the trick to success: pratically all the whites repudiates racism against blacks. The components of Black Movement are the union of some blacks and some whites. But Black Movement omit whites within the movement or put them in the background. The blacks within the movement accuse the collectivity of racism against blacks, the collectivity cares about it and tries to show that it does not practice racism against blacks. If Black Movement were militating in a collectivity that considers racism against blacks an acceptable thing, if not commendable, it would have a return from disregard at best to violence at worst. Therefore, Black Movement is manipulating the rest of whites (and even the rest of blacks) to get what it wants. But, and now the moral caste system enters, the ethical standard of Black Movement is not the same of the collectivity in general, hence Black Movement can practice or accept racism against whites and say that racism exists only when whites do racism against blacks. But not only that. Black Movement also rejects or even attacks a black, which it claims to represent, when that individual denounces that Black Movement practices the same racism that it says to combat. But not only that. From the beginning, a moral virtue such as honest work, which is widely practiced or valued in the collectivity, is uncommon in Black Movement, sometimes it's even vilified when practiced by a black person; or the contrary, the moral vice don't work honestly which is much avoided or despised in the collectivity is common in Black Movement, sometimes it's even glorified when practiced by a black person.
[3] The Feminist movement says that the collectivity practices sexism against women and, thereby, impairs women, which Feminist movement represents. More precisely, are the men who practices sexism against women. But neither the collectivity nor the men as a whole practices sexism against women, at least not since about 50 years. More, and here's the trick to success: pratically all men repudiates sexism against women. The components of Feminist movement are the union of some women and some men. But Feminist movement omit the men within the movement or put them in the background. The women within the movement accuse the collectivity of sexism against women, the collectivity cares about it and tries to show that it does not practice sexism against women. If Feminist movement were militating in a collectivity that considers sexism against women an acceptable thing, if not commendable, it would have a return from disregard at best to violence at worst. Therefore, Feminist movement is manipulating the rest of men (and even the rest of women) to get what it wants. But, and now the moral caste system enters, the ethical standard of Feminist movement is not the same of the collectivity in general, hence Feminist movement can practice or accept sexism against men and say that sexism exists only when men do sexism against women. But not only that. Feminist movement also rejects or even attacks a woman, which it claims to represent, when she denounces that Feminist movement practices the same sexism that it says to combat. But not only that. From the beginning, a moral virtue such as kindness, which is widely practiced or valued in the collectivity, is uncommon in Feminist movement, sometimes it's even vilified when practiced by a woman; or the contrary, the moral vice antipathy which is much avoided or despised in the collectivity is common in Feminist movement, sometimes it's even glorified when practiced by a woman.
[4] OK, I'm an libertine atheist girl and you've seen more Bible in this text than in preaching in some churches. This is an example of what I have set forth here, more precisely that the church failed to combat the whole scheme, if it did not directly contribute to build it.
Questo testo in italiano senza video di dissolutezza in Réflexion et Temps Libre avec Abigail: "Il sistema delle caste morale (Le concubine di Lucifero 2)", https://avezdasmulheres2.blogspot.com/2018/12/le-concubine-di-lucifero-2.html. Questo testo in italiano con video di dissolutezza in Amélioration et Amusement des Hommes avec Abigail: "Il sistema delle caste morale (Le concubine di Lucifero 2)", https://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2018/12/le-concubine-di-lucifero-2.html. 
Ce texte en français sans vidéos de libertinage au Réflexion et Temps Libre avec Abigail: "Le système de castes moral (Les concubines de Lucifer 2)", https://avezdasmulheres2.blogspot.com/2018/12/les-concubines-de-lucifer-2.html. Ce texte en français avec vidéos de libertinage au Amélioration et Amusement des Hommes avec Abigail: "Le système de castes moral (Les concubines de Lucifer 2)", https://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2018/12/les-concubines-de-lucifer-2.html. 
Eso texto en español sin videos de putaría en Réflexion et Temps Libre avec Abigail: "El sistema de castas moral (Las concubinas de Lucifer 2)", https://avezdasmulheres2.blogspot.com/2018/12/las-concubinas-de-lucifer-2.html. Eso texto en español con videos de putaría en Amélioration et Amusement des Hommes avec Abigail: "El sistema de castas moral (Las concubinas de Lucifer 2)", https://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2018/12/las-concubinas-de-lucifer-2.html. 
This text in English without licentiousness videos at Réflexion et Temps Libre avec Abigail: "The moral caste system (The Lucifer's concubines 2)", https://avezdasmulheres2.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-lucifers-concubines-2.html. This text in English with licentiousness videos at Amélioration et Amusement des Hommes avec Abigail: "The moral caste system (The Lucifer's concubines 2)", https://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-lucifers-concubines-2.html. 
Texto original em português sem vídeos de putaria no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade: "O sistema de castas moral (As concubinas de Lúcifer 2)", http://avezdasmulheres.blogspot.com/2018/12/as-concubinas-de-lucifer-2.html. Texto original em português com vídeos de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam: "O sistema de castas moral (As concubinas de Lúcifer 2)", http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2018/12/as-concubinas-de-lucifer-2.html.
