A great mistake of the right-wing is that many people within it treat the leftists like debaters from bad to mediocre in a normal lunchroom conversation. The trouble is that Socialism exists precisely to destroy the mental normality and to create a society that fuses stupidity with political-social life itself. The bourgeoisie of the French Revolution and the Communists of the Karl Marx epoch even had wrong things to fight against, and they fought against some of them. But the socialist movement also ended up fighting against what was left of decent, like when it turned the universities into sinecures for psychotic lesbians, parasitic militants with median IQ, and data counterfeiters. The conservatives say that it has also turned the universities into dens of alcohol, drugs and prostitution, but I have been in university parties and I know that with alcohol or drugs, the boy can barely stand up and he does not "work" (and I stay there drinking soda).
But when I say that the socialist movement produces a society based on stupidity, I am not saying that a little group of parasites and psychopaths with some power or money are making the rest of the population to be stupid. If someone like me or you who are reading can, at the very least, think that something is wrong around us, this already proves that a socialist elite can not even to make the rest of the population to have the worldview they want, even if contrary thoughts have almost no channels of expression. The case is more serious: insanity, folly, and hatred for truth have existed before it among the common people, the maximum that Socialism can be accused of is channeling them for its own benefit. This includes putting people in important positions not despite the lack of merit, but because of it.
In this decade in Brazil, in other countries too, concepts and logical inferences that were in the public domain 20 years ago are transformed into discussions both between ordinary people and between so-called experts. Many people believe in implausible statistics as if they were public and notorious data from real life. The press lies about the real world and even newspapers in microregions of less than 200,000 inhabitants lie about local news. This all is part, as the columnist Alexandre Borges would say, of a "war against the truth". Is this because of the sabotage of our educational system in the last 30 or 40 years? Well, it is too. So why exist surveys that show that the students' parents are satisfied with these schools, some of them even saying that this school is better than the one in their time? Exactly because they see school and college as a passport to the top ranks of the whole crap. Today, as easy as leaving a university without knowing to interpret a three paragraphs text is to enter into it with the prospect of having a chief position in the public service. And there is another problem that can be even more decisive: filling up all mass media, arts and entertainment environment, and media of technical-scientific production with leftist militant sub-intellectuals seems to be the hope of folly's victory over the real world. It is as if truth itself, greatness of mind, intelligence, moral magnificence, or just being right with some frequency, as if it was a witness to a crime who can be murdered with an undetectable poison. In the case of Brazil, this happened before the Workers' Party's mandate, it is true, that is exactly why it reached the Presidency of the Republic.
In Brazilian law, adultery ceased to be a crime in 2005 and prostitution in 2009. When sex outside marriage was a crime, was it not interesting for any cow to offer herself as the only sexual opportunity for a man? Or for her to retaliate against this man if he sought joy, not only in the sexual sense, outside of marriage? And would not adultery have ceased to be a crime when there were already many of those same cows committing it? Adultery ceased to be a crime in the year I began my adventures, and prostitution, the year I turned 18 years old, and it saved me, hehehehe. And what dictatorship of the twentieth century did not gain support from the population through using the discourse of defending family values? And why have feminist women and conservative women always had in common the war on male pleasure?
Let's take the Brazilian case as an example and let's make some questions that no one traditional Christian preacher or writer and no one political analyst has yet answered:
1) If the Forum of São Paulo really resurrected the world communist movement, how could it happen in the largest Catholic country in the world?
2) How a socialist style president of the largest Catholic country in the world managed to be re-elected, and with more votes than in the previous election, after a scheme of corruption of the Legislative Power to benefit him was denounced the previous year in the largest television news in the country, like the Mensalão (Big Monthly) was exposed in the Jornal Nacional in Lula's first mandate? (Let's skip the part of how he managed to be elected the first time)
3) How and why does the data that socialist regimes produced 100 million deaths among their own populations, by the way a calculation made by leftists and underestimated calculation according to themselves, circulates among less people than some banality about a soccer player?
Answer: Conservatives themselves have not fought against a real Socialism, they only think of re-creating the bankrupt dynasties of colonel landowners in the countryside, with their gymnophobic matriarchs and their false moralistic boys with obsessive-compulsive disorders. Since, in addition, the socialist movement itself began demoralizing conservative thinking, and fairly, all significant actions against the worst of Socialism as politics and of leftism as militancy were the work of ex-militants, direct victims' struggles or internal criticism.
In the darkest times of Roman Catholicism or even in the time of horrors shortly after the French Revolution, there was hypocrisy, which by definition is the pretense of virtue. The entire community could be sinful, sordid, but at least outwardly it professed a high or at least acceptable moral system, and even when it committed insanities and atrocities, it was in the name of a supposedly high system of ideas. Socialism wants to end up even with this, the recognition even in facade to a morally worthy set of principles. We can see this in the very persons of the militants of the Black Movement or of the Feminism. These people demand a thousand things for blacks, women, lesbians, but rare of them are known by having a remarkable ethical level, or even by adopting the Golden Rule, to give others the treatment they would like to receive. But this is not hypocrisy, it's not even incoherence. The person really believes that can judge and offend God and the world (literally), but can not be judged or offended. Every leftist militant, if is not a person of high moral-mental level who will get out when he or she realizes where has entered, wants to be a caste superior to the rest of humanity.
Ah, I remembered a trick. I was in high school, it was International Women's Day, I was 15 to 16 years old and I was in the schoolyard near a group of girls and female teachers who were doing the usual lesbofeminist speech. Then I said: "folks, we do not have to be against man to be in favor of women". I lifted my T-shirt and I was already without a bra. The boys, "eeeeh!". The girls wanted to beat me right there.
But that does not mean that a socialist government or a leftist militancy that dominates politics is a tiny group of demons dominating an honest, or even passive, people. For a quick example, the Lula administration that created the Mensalão scheme, in order to buy votes in what would be the opposition in the Legislative, and consolidated an extreme left-wing militancy financed with public money is the same as expanding the Bolsa Família (Family Grant) program (he lied about to have created the program, but the growth was so great that the lie worked), it expanded the public and private universities although the quality fell and it enlarged the system of quotas for afrodescendants and graduates of public schools in these universities. Then, Lula finished each of the two mandates with more than 70% of approval and he managed to create the Lamppost Dilma Rousseff, which only suffered impeachment because she made so much bullshit that lacked money for these same programs, only then she gained a 70% rejection.
Paulo Freire said still in 1970 in his book "Pedagogia do Oprimido" (Pedagogy of the Oppressed) that "for the oppressed", without a Pedagogy of the Oppressed, "the new man is themselves, becoming oppressors of others". We can see that from there until the decade of 2010, even the left-wing has worsened in relation to itself. As we have seen in printed newspapers of the last five years, the dream that Paulo Freire describes, of ordinary people evolving inwardly to create a non-oppressive society, became into a nightmare of people below the average of their own community wanting to create a even worse society where any personal criticism toward themselves is a crime. But the worst thing is that we are led to believe that the success of the leftist governments is not despite this, is exactly because of it. Exactly because this can produce a country where half-illiterates may have a degree in Medicine, a city where there is a new police station to meet slanders by sluts against the ex-husband while the overall homicide rate only grows. Left-wing militants and the general public who do not oppose leftism want to turn the world into Hell in order to be Lucifer's concubines.
Questo testo in italiano senza filmati di dissolutezza in Men of Worth Newspaper: "Le concubine di Lucifero", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2016/12/le-concubine-di-lucifero.html. Questo testo in italiano con filmati di dissolutezza in Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Le concubine di Lucifero", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2016/12/le-concubine-di-lucifero.html. Ce texte en français sans films de libertinage au Men of Worth Newspaper: "Les concubines de Lucifer", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2016/12/les-concubines-de-lucifer.html. Ce texte en français avec films de libertinage au Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Les concubines de Lucifer", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2016/12/les-concubines-de-lucifer.html. Eso texto en español sin películas de putaría en Men of Worth Newspaper: "Las concubinas de Lucifer", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2016/12/las-concubinas-de-lucifer.html. Eso texto en español con películas de putaría en Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Las concubinas de Lucifer", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2016/12/las-concubinas-de-lucifer.html. This text in English without licentiousness movies at Men of Worth Newspaper: "The Lucifer's concubines", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2016/12/the-lucifer-s-concubines.html. This text in English with licentiousness movies at Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "The Lucifer's concubines", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2016/12/the-lucifers-concubines.html. Texto original em português sem filmes de putaria no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade: "As concubinas de Lúcifer", http://avezdasmulheres.over-blog.com/2016/12/as-concubinas-de-lucifer.html. Texto original em português com filmes de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam: "As concubinas de Lúcifer", http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2016/12/as-concubinas-de-lucifer.html.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire
Abigail Pereira Aranha at / en / dans / a VK: vk.com/abigail.pereira.aranha