Politeness in rape reports

Abigail Pereira Aranha

It has been said and proved that moral degradation and mental degradation are linked, both in individuals and in communities. An example of work in this regard is the book "Political Ponerology", by dr. Andrew M. Lobaczewski. But if there is no moral degradation without mental degradation, both intellectual and psychiatric, is it also true that there is no moral excellence without good intelligence and good mental soundness? Yes.

If you know the Bible (I do not believe in it), you may have noticed that at least the good part of biblical Christianity is not to fainthearted persons. Elias called the 450 prophets of Baal, who ate at the Queen Jezebel's table, to a public challenge to their god against the God of which he was the sole representative on the occasion (1 Kings 18: 17-40). Jesus Christ himself would have been a sucker like Dalai Lama, and would have lived as long as he, if he had not done things like expel the temple door marketers (Luke 19: 45-48) or expose the hypocrisy of the scribes and Pharisees (chapter 23 of Matthew is devoted entirely to it). How many prophets would be left in the Bible if they cared to talk softly with the king or the priests? Let's take less bold cases? Egyptian midwives when Pharaoh wanted to control the growth of the Jewish people, they had orders to kill newborns if they were boys, but they disobeyed because of the fear of God (Exodus 1: 15-21). Gideon received a call from God to take down an altar to Baal, he did it at night, but he did (Judges 6: 25-27). Abigail (1 Samuel 25: 2-42) sent food to the servants of David who were mistreated by her husband behind his back. But my favorite biblical female character is not Abigail: is Rahab, who besides smart and brave, was a prostitute, hehehehe. When the Hebrew spies came to Jericho, she hid them of the king of the city in his own house, on the wall of the city (Joshua 2). And though it was "well served", the city was minuscule!

("Travels on a D.N.A. molecule – the first farmers", http://midgleywebpages.com/dna.html)

But there's another scripture, from Jesus to his disciples, but that could be a promise to those who were not: "and whosoever shall give to drink unto one of these little ones a cup of cold {water} only in the name of a disciple, verily I say unto you, he shall in no wise lose his reward" (Matthew 10: 42). How much good will, or even courage, could be behind that glass of water?

Let us remember the words of Jesus about the false prophets, but also apply to his own disciples: "Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?" (Matthew 7: 16). Matthew 7: 15-20 are about the fruits as consequences of the nature, but verse 16 also shows something else: the fruits make us recognize the tree. If you, for example, never saw a guava tree, but you know how is a guava and you are walking in the fields when you see a tree with guavas, that's all, you discovered how is a guava tree. More scriptures on good works: James 2: 14-26, Ephesians 2: 10, Matthew 5: 16. The list in Hebrews 11 is called "heroes of faith", including Rahab in verse 31. Many suckers argue that good works do not lead to salvation and they think they liquidated the issue, but what these texts say is that there are good works that are CONSEQUENCE of the salvation and of the difference of those who follow the Gospel.

No more Bible! I am preacher of atheism and fornication and this already is unappropriated for me, hehehehe! The point I emphasize here is that the good speech and the PRACTICAL good deeds characterize, TOGETHER, the honorable people. But we are so accustomed to the evil, the stupidity, the mediocrity and the lack of action that we consider that a person is of good character only because this person never did anything WRONG.

I myself, as early readers have seen me say, I have tried to be the joy of my friends and acquaintances men of worth in the physical world since I was 14 years old. Conversations filled with giggles is something to a bitch who is closer friend of the bus collector and of the bus driver, she travels half naked without paying passage in exchange for covert glances and indecent comments behind her. I have more I can give and I have found that men deserve what I have to give. And I have given. It's not what you are thinking, but only in that part were 247 kittens in 10 years.

Today, even evangelical churches, which recently had a moral conduct recognized even by their worst enemies, were driven by the moral crisis of the Christian West, which is anecdotal in Brazil in particular. "Angola prohibits operation of evangelical churches from Brazil", article of Folha de São Paulo at 04/27/2013. Among the prohibited churches are Universal Church of the Kingdom of God and World Church of God's Power. The founder of these last, Valdomiro Santiago, was pastor in the first and created a faction. The first, in the following year, would support the then candidate for re-election to the presidency of Brazil, the former terrorist lesbian-Socialist Dilma Rousseff. Folks, I have to bring three more biblical texts. Let's record it: I, being a licentious atheist, I put more biblical texts in this text that much pastors in a preaching. What if one say in the majority of the churches today "be ye followers of me, even as I also {am} of Christ" (1 Corinthians 11: 1)? This one can hear: "Your glorying {is} not good" (1 Corinthians 5: 6a). Folks, I could not miss the joke. We got to the point that the text of Matthew 7: 1-5, the one that starts with "judge not", passes from the admonition of Jesus against the hypocrisy to a cliché of bitches in end of carreer against the moral sense. The today typical Christian understands any demonstration of zeal for virtue as hypocrisy, because he lost the moral and mental ability to imagine an authentic virtue, even if it is imperfect. So, for him, every virtue is a farce in itself. Incidentally, this Christian sees imperfect virtues only when they are, in fact, the persistence of himself or of his group in shamelessness and stupidity. But the median Christians do not realize, by functional illiteracy and moral illiteracy, that the message of Jesus is not that the rest of the world is as sordid as themselves or worse, it is that himself, Jesus, will put in them the sticks they like use in the other (folks, at that time canes were used as tape measures). It is because of this crisis that the evangelical church grew numerically, because, as they say in evangelical circles, the world entered the church. It is no coincidence that the inconsistencies that observers as the Brazilians Luciano Ayan and Olavo de Carvalho or the American Thomas Sowell highlight in the leftists today, both politicians and "thinking elite", are very much similar to the absurdities that intellectually reasonable atheists documented in the Christian environment in the 2000s. Even the historic churches have passed the stage of hypocrisy, the rule is the aversion to the greatness of character along with the exaltation of semi-illiteracy and gimnophobia.

Since I do not believe neither in God nor in chastity, I can see more clearly a mistake of Christians that is dangerous even for Christians themselves: the "parental control" in television programming, the Internet, etc. You Christian reader probably can make an acceptable defense of chastity. But have been decades in which Christians helped in the fight against pornography, prostitution and sex outside marriage and, therefore, consolidated socialism while prostitutes were murdered by state omission, but people were arrested or prosecuted for works considered indecent. I have brought a small selection still in December 2007 and another in September 2010: what has happened to some people because they saw or did erotic or pornographic material was not done, at least not so quickly, to many people who were proven they are involved corruption or many notoriously bad employees. In November 2014, I wrote "Viva prostitution, pornography and... civil liberties", in which in addition to showing that the crackdown on pornography and prostitution is associated with political repression, I quoted examples (excerpt from other text) showing that the same tools used to censor naked women ALREADY WERE USED to censor anti-left or traditional Christian content. Moreover, it is illustrative to see the rev. Augustus Nicodemus Lopes, who wrote the text "Qual o problema em gostar um pouco de pornografia?" (What's wrong in liking a little porn?) repeating the same blatant lies used by the worst factions of Feminism to transform male heterosexuality in police matter, write "Não estou ofendido" (I'm not offended), commented one staging of a transsexual nailed to a cross in a LGBT Parade sponsored at least by the bank Caixa Econômica Federal and the City Hall of São Paulo just to make a theater of indifferent superiority - or, even worse, to show with sincerity his own inability to perceive when the faith he professes is publicly attacked.

You Brazilian Christian friends probably can cite names in your own circle of convivence whose if go to church on Sunday night, do not going in the morning, but they block their brother on Facebook because he criticizes the Workers Party. Christian and atheist anti-feminist friends have seen that when they share some pearl by "radical" feminists, or just an atrocity committed by a woman, in Facebook, may appear moderate feminist and non-feminists women like a swarm of bees saying that one should not generalize, but never one of them said she was blocked by a feminist woman for disagreeing that all men are monsters. In the case of teacher Tericka Dye, that I mentioned in that text written in 2007, how much the United States' educational system had advanced as manufacturer of semi-literate leftists and sinecure of disqualified lesbian-Socialists until 2006, when it thought a woman should not be more a teacher for she made a pornographic film about 10 years before? The title of this text, by the way, was not a trivial provocation. The moral weakness uses hypersensitivity to trifles as if it was demonstration of moral soundness by itself. It's like requiring a rape victim use a language appropriate for 13 years old teenagers to file the case at the police station or the police report to use. Those who think that the language of the police report may be more noteworthy that rape it reports, at best is a fainthearted who values more politeness than the defense of justice, or who despises less evil itself than the harsh language in his denounce. At worst, is someone who defends the criminal or crime with a embellished subterfuge. This can be for an average person without much hope not to face the world. This can be for a person with a bad character not to face the own interior. But, inevitably, the moral weakness ends up turning into immoral motive power.

	Questo testo in italiano senza film di dissolutezza in Men of Worth Newspaper / Concrete Paradise: Buone maniere nei rapporti di stupro, http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2015/07/02/buone-maniere-nei-rapporti-di-stupro
	Questo testo in italiano con film di dissolutezza in Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía / Paraíso Tangible: Buone maniere nei rapporti di stupro, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/07/buone-maniere-nei-rapporti-di-stupro.html
	Eso texto en español sin videos de putaría en Men of Worth Newspaper / Concrete Paradise: La urbanidad en los informes de violación, http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2015/07/02/la-urbanidad-en-los-informes-de-violacion
	Eso texto en español con videos de putaría en Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía / Paraíso Tangible: La urbanidad en los informes de violación, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/07/la-urbanidad-en-los-informes-de.html
	This text in English without licentiousness videos at Men of Worth Newspaper / Concrete Paradise: Politeness in rape reports, http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2015/07/02/politeness-in-rape-reports
	This text in English with licentiousness videos at Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía / Paraíso Tangible: Politeness in rape reports, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/07/politeness-in-rape-reports.html
	Texto original em português sem vídeos de putaria no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade: Boas maneiras em queixas de estupro, http://avezdasmulheres.blog.com/2015/07/02/boas-maneiras-em-queixas-de-estupro
	Texto original em português com vídeos de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam: Boas maneiras em queixas de estupro, http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2015/07/boas-maneiras-em-queixas-de-estupro.html

From Abigail's profile: Pharisees and Christians

What Jesus said to the disciples was: "let your light shine before men, that they may see your good works". When he said "you must be careful to do everything they tell you, but do not do what they do", he was talking about the Pharisees who wanted to kill him.

Abigail Pereira Aranha

http://www.facebook.com/abigail.pereira.aranha.91

https://plus.google.com/102494518729286023431

http://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/AbigailPereira

http://pinterest.com/abigailpereira

Why Abigail, the preacher of debauchery, never defended the freedom of women on their own bodies?

1. Because sexual freedom of women is the case of the young woman of 15 or 16 years old who fights against father and mother to live with a bandit.
2. Because sexual freedom of womyn is to abort the child who will derail her career, the university course or the image of serious girl.
3. Because "in a patriarchal society all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent". (Catherine MacKinnon) Wikiquote note: "These words were quoted by the conservative writer Cal Thomas as coming from Professing Feminism, a book which he mistakenly ascribed to Catharine MacKinnon. [2] The passage does appear in that book, but is given as the author's characterization of MacKinnon's views rather than a direct quotation.
   Instead MacKinnon argues that heterosexuality "institutionalizes male sexual dominance and female sexual submission" (1982) and that "Sexual access is regularly forced or pressured or routinized beyond denial" (1991)" That's all right, if "all heterosexual intercourse is rape" is distorting the words of the distinguished woman, "heterosexuality institutionalizes male sexual dominance and female sexual submission" means what?
4. Because sexual freedom of womyn is to love a man or a woman if she want, but without wanting to love men.
5. Because no woman met hiddenly a boy who works at day and studies at night for both losing their virginity at 15 or 16 years old.
6. Because no man of worth (and poor) found a feminist girl saying "my body is mine, the rules are mine and I am interested to have sex with you".
7. Because no one feminist said to a bandit or a women agressor he saw decent female bodies only in pornography.
8. Because woman freedom of have sex with whoever she want is almost always the freedom of not wanting to have sex with any man except that jealous stupid she has already complained to the police and she herself took from the police station.
9. Because having an affair with a college professor while has a boyfriend can be feminine sexual freedom, but being a prostitute or a porn star is being held captive exploited by patriarchy.
10. Because being a prostitute or a porn star enjoying what she does is degrading the image of women.
11. Because freedom of women on their own bodies is enter in a bus with a provocative clothes and pout for any man who looks at her.
12. Because freedom of women on their own bodies is to go half naked to a protest against machismo / sexism and feel disrespected when men appearing like.
13. Because who supports the legalization of prostitution does not march in the city center with her breasts exposed, because the minority can not be caught as an "interested party" and most do not have breasts.
14. Because being a beautiful woman, of face and body, and pose for a photo in lingerie or bikini is being an object collaborating to imposition of the standard of beauty of macho society.
15. Because girls who have sensual photos released on the internet do not talk about sexual freedom, they talk about process for moral damages.
16. Because we've never seen a women's sexual freedom defender receiving a heterosexual male friend at home for a visit as a friend.
17. Because you've never seen a woman be the target of slander because she received two male friends or relatives at home and respond to gossip "next time I will bring two men for you too" (because Abigail do not live in an apartment, hehehehe).
18. Because we've never seen a women's sexual freedom defender receiving a heterosexual male friend at home for lustful purposes.
19. Because every woman with a possessive boyfriend or husband speaks of her darling to the other men, not about the other men to the darling.
20. Because the biggest problem of the woman who is loved by several men in every double meanings is the woman who is not.

Therefore, this lascivious girl never preached sexual liberation. Firstly she liberated her "hairy", then she told how it's good and who do not really like what she does. Chy, chy, chy, chy, chy!

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Questo testo in italiano senza fumetti di dissolutezza, in Concrete Paradise: Perché Abigail, la predicatore di dissolutezza, mai difeso la libertà delle donne sul proprio corpo?, http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2014/04/14/perche-abigail-mai-difeso-la-liberta-delle-donne

Questo testo in italiano con fumetti di dissolutezza, in Paraíso Tangible: Perché Abigail, la predicatore di dissolutezza, mai difeso la libertà delle donne sul proprio corpo?, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2014/04/perche-abigail-la-predicatore-di.html

Eso texto en español sin caricaturas de libertinaje, en lo Concrete Paradise: ¿Por qué Abigail, la predicadora de libertinaje, nunca defendió la libertad de la mujer sobre su propio cuerpo?, http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2014/04/14/por-que-abigail-nunca-defendio-la-libertad-de-la-mujer

Eso texto en español con caricaturas de libertinaje, en lo Paraíso Tangible: ¿Por qué Abigail, la predicadora de libertinaje, nunca defendió la libertad de la mujer sobre su propio cuerpo?, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2014/04/por-que-abigail-la-predicadora-de.html

This text in English without debauchery cartoons, at Concrete Paradise: Why Abigail, the preacher of debauchery, never defended the freedom of women on their own bodies?, http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2014/04/14/why-abigail-never-defended-the-freedom-of-women

This text in English with debauchery cartoons, at Paraíso Tangible: Why Abigail, the preacher of debauchery, never defended the freedom of women on their own bodies?, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2014/04/why-abigail-preacher-of-debauchery.html

Texto original em português sem cartuns de safadeza, no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade: Por que a Abigail, a pregadora da devassidão, nunca defendeu a liberdade da mulher sobre o próprio corpo?, http://avezdasmulheres.blog.com/2014/04/14/abigail-nunca-defendeu-a-liberdade-da-mulher

Texto original em português com cartuns de safadeza: Por que a Abigail, a pregadora da devassidão, nunca defendeu a liberdade da mulher sobre o próprio corpo?, no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam, http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2014/04/por-que-abigail-pregadora-da-devassidao.html, e no Viver a Vida e Planejamento Estratégico, http://imaculadaeabigail.blogspot.com.br/2014/04/por-que-abigail-pregadora-da-devassidao.html

The ex-useful innocents and idiots (or: 17 centuries of socialism)

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Chapter 1: What Jesus Christ and Our Lady have to do with the Lesbo-Socialism?

There are now seven years since I started the blog A Vez das Mulheres. In these days, I began to remember the beginning. Who disliked my work in the beginning were macho men and narrow-minded Christians. No much time, I has got antipathy in feminist groups because I condemned lesbianism and female mediocrity. And also I was together with atheists. Today, my great friends in Facebook are mostly devout Christians, right-wing or even machoes. And I am also partner of Brazilian masculinism, aka "Real", and I was almost always well received in their forums and blogs (when some disgusted misogynist came to attack me, I have been defended in the group itself). And the enemies I got still remain (lesbofeminists, manginas and "leftopaths"), in addition that atheists almost disappear from my company because, unless very few, they're emasculated leftists or just some sucker kids. But what caught my attention the most was not only my medium change to defend the same ideals (freedom, justice, honor, decency, naughtiness, etc.), along with a lot of people that came out from left-wing to defend democracy in the same time. Was that we went out, at least apparently, from a puritan hegemony to a socialist hegemony. Plus: it was kind half a century, and it seems like out of nowhere. But it was not. The history of socialism would have started at the beginning of the fourth century?

The Catholic Church was established in the year 313. Recalling that only the calculation of the year in which Jesus would have born was made in the seventh century. The Catholic Church as well as having similarities with the Babylonian paganism was a religion more of feasts and rituals than of doctrine (if you are older, you remember the time when the Catholic was afraid, literally, to read the Bible). Just to give an example, the Carnival was a farewell to flesh before Ash Wednesday. And Ash Wednesday, which begins Lent, is always 47 days before the first Sunday of the full moon of Spring in the Northern Hemisphere, that is Autumn in the Southern Hemisphere. And this Sunday is Easter. The pagan Easter, the Jew Passover is in late March or early April. And speaking of pagan, hence the term paganism? From paganus, which means peasant. Why is the Gospel of the Son of God had to make concessions to the pagans?

But there's more. Who was Jesus Christ, in human terms? A Jewish from people. Is it not curious that the Incarnate Word was supposedly one more nationalist leader of an obscure, failed and megalomaniacal colony of the Roman Empire? If the disciples of Jesus Christ at least stood out society, instead of Israel to continue in the same way until Dispersion and even today most devout Christians to be poorer than average even in Christian countries, we could even give a discount.

And Mary, or Our Lady? The Bible itself does not give any basis for all the veneration which is made to her in the Catholic Church. In the New Testament, she is just another disciple of Jesus without special position. Outside the Gospels, she is only mentioned in passing in Acts 1: 14. And where in the New Testament a woman has position or authority in the church? But the Catholic Church, making adaptation of Babylonian mythology, deifies the madam.

You reader did not understand the connection? How a people accustomed to alms and the glorification of misery will be against communism? What model of decent life a person will have if the Son of God was a carpenter in Israel, a irrelevant colony with superiority complex? How not having a socialism where the dominant religion began, according to its Bible, with a group almost all of poor and marginalized people around the God made man, who after it faced the power of the Roman Empire? How difficult would have the feminism where is venerated, or worshiped, a woman besides to God the Son?

Chapter 2: The Catholic Church was the Christianity's Soviet Union

And came Marxism, Socialism, Feminism. The Soviet Union began in Russia, with the base (or excuse, some might say) on the ideas of Karl Marx, a German. And this German had his inspiration, among other sources, on the Evolution of an English Anglican, Charles Darwin. Feminism came along (in time and space) with the Industrial Revolution, in the United Kingdom and the United States. In this whole story, which country was not Catholic or Protestant? The Catholic Inquisition ended in the late eighteenth century. Folks, is it no coincidence that at the end of the eighteenth century and the first half of the nineteenth century we had the end of the Inquisition, the Industrial Revolution, the Capitalism and the beginning of Socialism? Had the Christian Church (in that popular sense "we are the church") prepare its own kick in the ass?

Ah, you are a Christian but not a Catholic, and believe that Roman Catholicism is a deviation from the original Christianity? So why the Roman Catholic Church was the first major Christian church, assuming that Christianity really began at the end of the years 20 a. C.? Why Roman Catholicism is the main group in Christianity until today, and until a few decades ago the world's largest religion? If the Catholic Church was devious, it managed to chase the faithful churches just because it had political power? Ah, the Catholic Church was great in power and popularity because it was unfaithful, demagogic and corrupt? Well, you're getting to the point.

Everything some anti-left Christians complain today began in the time of glory of their church. The glorification of ignorance uses even today misinterpreted passages from the Bible itself. The internal fighting of the left or fighting between left and a centrism as if they were good (the leftist faction) against evil (the rest) resemble those braggadocioes of the Protestant Reformation and Counter-Reformation. The attacks on the internet against anyone who just says the name of a known anti-left or a snowman judas chosen by the left remember the Catholic Inquisition and their prohibitted books. And what should be an "exchange of ideas" with prominent people, including experts and university professors, reminds disagreements with provincial pious and illiterate rural workers in the 50's.

And what was the contribution of the Christian churches to humanity? Anti-sexuality, glorification of misery, destruction of science of the Greeks and ride on the backs of Christians who did something. And as we try to show here, the implementation of Marxism. If someone thought of high moral standards, all that is decent in terms of morality did not come in the years 20 a. C. But Christians want the royalties of Medicine made when the Catholic Church forbade dissection of cadavers, of Mathematics made when the Catholic Church said that zero was Devil's thing, of Rule of Law achieved after absolutism justified with the "divine right of kings", and so on. This resembles the leftist talk about countries "recovered" by socialism. They always ended up with a misery that did not exist and problems that after them got only wors. And the socialists still invented vaccine for cancer in Cuba (I like to play with phrases of double meaning, hehehehe).

Leaving a little of topic, but speaking of Christianity's contribution to humanity: the Catholic Church created Islam. According to the former Jesuit priest Alberto Rivera, the Church wanted Israel, especially Jerusalem, then funded Muhammad to create a sort of Al Qaeda and join the Arabian Peninsula, which was a bunch of disunited tribes, to everyone assault Israel. But until then, the business was so successful that at the time of deliver Jerusalem to the Pope, as agreed, the Arabs cheated. Red Ice Creations has this story (in English).

In Brazil, for example, there is no party, not even an organization of weight, which represents the right-wing or conservatism, yet the leftists have delirii of right-wing opposition or a plot of the elites when they see any tweet that disagrees with them. Any heterosexual not ashamed being heterosexual is gay killer, any man who mention the false charges of rape is in favor of violence against women, any white who thinks blacks should not get easier in college just for being blacks is racist. These things remind the times of the Inquisition, in which Catholics found heretics and atheists even among themselves. Remember also Brazil today, which has 90% of the population Catholic, Protestant or evangelical, but "turned its back to God".

And how begun the Protestant Reformation? As an attempt to restore the purity of original Christianity in the Roman Catholic Church. This recalls, in Brazil, the story of PSTU (Unified Socialist Workers Party, which started with people leaving PT, Workers Party, after the party started "fail" socialist ideology).

Chapter 3: The Christian Junior Anti-Sex League

Sex: wisdom in sexual life is one thing, good; chastity is another, pain in the ass. Who believes admire the opposite sex or have a good sex is sin, can accept anything. That "anything" includes the glorification of the lack of pleasure (in general), the canonization of self-sadism, treating as special who treats this one as inferior (family, church, company and country) and measuring oneself according to which will leave for the widow who has bored in the fifth year of marriage and spoiled children. Christian churches have stopped demonizing sex (in Brazil) trailer sex education in schools (90's), grudgingly. If in the 60's Christian men were still seeking prostitutes, harassed female employees or girls within their family or had sex with mares, is was because they could not stand accepting the repression of sexuality. Repress the own sexuality could have some advantage for women because release pusssy only to her husband and, perhaps, to some other prominent man could yield a livelihood or social and professional standing, all off the hard life of men. But lesbonazists can only see the supposed repression of female sexuality, and any man who has ever said something close to sexuality in conversations with their 2010's female friends knows the kick that takes these times. The person who tries not to enjoy sex turns neurotic. And more than neurotic, is inconsistent, hypocritical, doublethinker ("doublethink" is from the novel "1984", by George Orwell: bear in mind two contradictory things and accept both). When it is not just mental inactivity.

Who is the Christian who can make an intellectually serious defense, in 2013, of because only have sex after and within marriage? What is the Christian who can explain, as smart people, what makes a woman who has "enjoyed" having less dignity as a woman and be less desirable as a wife than one of the bizarre and pharisees lizards covered to the ankle in his church? The only reasonable answer to these questions that I saw published written was a text within the book "Excelentíssimos Senhores" (Gentlemen), by Rubem Amorese (yeah, sweeties, I know the good in the Christian culture and fine Christian). More than simple lack of arguments or self-criticism, the "moral and good manners" is a individual psychosis tributary of a collective psychosis. Is not it curious that the socialist countries are of people even more sexually frustrated that Puritan countries considered free? George Orwell gave this within "1984" in a dialogue of the girl of Junior Anti-Sex League with Winston.

Chapter 4 : Christian conservatism almost "fulfilling its historic role" and what it still has to offer (to "them")

If the Catholic Church was important in the Middle Ages, it was because it almost monopolized bit of Science of the time and also offered charity and illusion for the illiterate with so much fear and ignorance while they fought the true intelligence. It was also like this, with less force in the Modern Age. But even those who do not like reading and hate intelligence and truth like to use them up where it matters when they can. Or, at least, they like what scientists and thinkers get practicing their love of Science, the truth and the neighboor when it increases the quality of life. And those weird news that our students today use to read unwillingly in the books they have gained in the public school were better than the scientific level of the Europe which one third died in the Black Death in the Middle Ages. The Modern Age was the period which concentrated scientific development before the Industrial Revolution. If I lived in the late Modern Age and had some influence like Adam Weishaupt, who created order of Illuminati in May 1, 1776, I would not work hard, risk my leather and have exhausting discussions to give the fruit of my labor for imbecile nobles, untalented commissioned and parasite priests, trying to improve the lives of these same frustrated snitche illiterates that they would use to steal my work and my possessions. And it was more or less what the Illuminati have done.

And since one of the goals of the Illuminati was to destroy religion, is it not curious that of those of the Conspiracy Theory and speaking in secret societies, almost all are most devoted Christians? These particular people are even worthy of respect, but as a group of conservative Christians capitalists, they are the first to notice, and badly, that are being discarded. Folks, why the Communist Manifesto appeared almost 60 years after the French Revolution that ended feudalism and created capitalism? Why after the Second International, in 1889, the history of Christianity was basically emergence of Pentecostal churches and odd sects, heretical organizations as the World Council of Churches, factions of factions, the Catholic Church only shrinking, serious churches hardly growing and public shame in all aspects, while Marxism, Feminism and the LGBT Movement were only forward, and sponsored by capitalists? This can not be a satanic conspiracy to achieve the church because Christianity in the West was like Maoism in China, so someone outside mount a conspiracy, even more to destroy the church itself from within, was very unlikely. Was Christianity itself who ceded here or lost authority there.

Liberalism and Christianity as known in the late nineteenth century are dead by their own defects, without expectation of resurrection. This is not good only because the heirs of them are even worse. Sex after a wedding in adolescence for women and at least about 25 years for men have had their time to be at least explainable. Today, the churches don't talk a lot about their teens boyfriends that already have sex, since don't come pregnancy. The indissoluble marriage has been justifiable to protect both rich husbands and dependents wives. Today, those who preach the indissoluble marriage are hardly taken seriously in traditional churches, and even among those who support the idea are few who would accept some marriage that besides indissoluble was arranged by the parents of spouses. In the 60's, the churches divided by truth. Today, they are tolerant in error. In a country of more than 20 percent of evangelicals, cases of Christians persecuted or killed for preaching the Gospel in hostile countries or have an attitude that was typical of a Christian in the 50's or 60's are treated in median access blogs and occasionally in Sunday preaching (do you know the Open Door USA Ministry, for example?). And to make things worse, we have leftists within the church, and not a deacon here, a shepherd there, but groups of feminists, groups of abortionists, groups of socialist, and even churches for homosexuals. Up to insist that Christians stop to think beyond criticism to give themselves a minimum of honesty is complicated. Back to conditions at least the 50's is a laughable idea so unfeasible.

And we have also Liberalism. Defend the privatization of state enterprises and less state intervention in business mobilizes little bourgeoisie itself. Rodrigo Constantine and Von Mises Institute can confirm, in the case of Brazil. Why? Because socialism and communism are state capitalism, or an oligarchy controlled by the State. Whoever is inside will get along and still see out over. And entrepreneurs can do business very profitable with socialist governments of other countries, consider the example of China. Even in governments that are not formally socialist, many entrepreneurs please the government to get public money. The capitalist who invests and accepts the risk is rare today. Is not only to support community leaders, imbecile bureaucrats, ghost workers and poor crooks that the State is obese, incompetent, expensive and corrupt. The major customer of corruption and misuse of public funds is the major enterprise. You may have noticed (I take the example of Brazil) more and more unsympathetic women in boxes of the stores, more and more snarly black women in major fast food chains, more and more babes entering companies that only offer vague asking experience having some old employee moved to teach her the service or fix her errors. Leftism, is not even socialism consolidated, gives the possibility of public money to entrepreneurs who are only "someone" because they are children of bourgeois. Entrepreneurs strive less to please customers, flatter the rulers, make choir to any Soviet campaign and may even subsidize their own incompetence with public money. Meanwhile, politicians and bureaucrats dominate society.

But the role of Christianity and Liberalism (also Ultraliberalism, mistakenly called Anarcho-capitalism) is not only to be a punching bag and caricature of the opposition to the left: they can still do more for the "popular revolution". The right-wing Christians can still defend the family, while the LGBT-Feminism advocates civil unions and adopting children for homosexuals. They can still condemn any woman who has had an orgasm or more than one men in life, as Valerie Solanas called silly the heterosexual woman in SCUM Manifesto. They can still preach against pornography, as feminists do, including asking the criminalization of pornography. They can still help make a mess of female prostitution with violence, trafficking in persons and humiliation of women, as feminists do, including asking the criminalization of prostitution. They can still accuse the LGBT Movement to promote pedophilia, as feminists do with Brazilian masculinist. They can still defend the end of the "good life" of the prisoners, as if all without exception had life of king in jail, while in the socialist countries government opponents are arrested without fundamental rights, if they go to jail. They can still ask for censorship on television calling any scene of woman in bikini pornography, increasing the power of the State to decide what the 10 years old child can see or not, helping furthermore the dictatorship of lesbofeminist envy. Those who know me since 2006 know that I wanted to see Christianity over, but not in so much dishonor.

The power emanates from the people. Including the power of the "powerful". And the socialists understood that. Soon, they may say that Christian conservatism has fulfilled its historic role.

From Abigail's profile: who believe herself / himself unjudgable, see what is humility and decency

Christian woman in the first century:

"Having your conversation honest among the Gentiles: that, whereas they speak against you as evildoers, they may by {your} good works, which they shall behold, glorify God in the day of visitation. {whereas: or, wherein} For so is the will of God, that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men" (1 Peter 2: 12, 15)

Christian woman in the XXI century:

"Before you judge my life or my character, put on my shoes and go through the path that I went through"

"Judging a person does not define who she / he is, define who you are"

Nobody is perfect, but not everyone is scum.

Abigail Pereira Aranha

http://www.facebook.com/abigail.pereira.aranha.91

https://plus.google.com/102494518729286023431

http://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/AbigailPereira

http://pinterest.com/abigailpereira

Nobody is more reactionary than one benefited by affirmative policies

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Folks, have you seen a woman seeming lesbofeminist in a job interview? Have you found a feminist woman, an afro militant or a LGBT militant in the coffee at the job? Have you looked for a black in Students Central Directory (before quotas, preferably)? Where are the leftists when they are not doing some march catching the return of those who work back home or writing articles that will not always be read by the public?

For example, let's look at these passages on women in the labor market:

Some characteristics such as sensitivity, affection, versatility, keen perception, among others, that until recently were considered weaknesses today began to add up and are considered essential in the production process of organizations. Features that we men have hidden or drowned to not to appear weak. In contrast, women always cultivated that as a gift, always seeking to develop them and mature them in every situation. (Roberto Shinyashiki, "Diferencial da mulher no mercado de trabalho" - Differential of women in the labor market -, http://www2.uol.com.br/vyaestelar/mulher_no_mercado.htm)

Women, in many ways, are more disciplined and perfectionists than men, which ends up causing greater dedication and objectivity in performing their tasks. Thus, their presence within organizations only does contribute to organizational success as a whole. (Rosângela Malaquias D'Amorim, "Inserção da mulher no mercado de trabalho: impactos na qualidade de vida e na estrutura organizacional" - Insertion of women in the labor market: impact on quality of life and organizational structure - , page 126, http://www.uaa.edu.py/investigacion/download/irundu_ano4_num1/Jun.2008_pag.111_insercao.pdf)

Women are masters at creating empathy and it needs to be with everyone from bosses, subordinates, customers, colleagues, employees, etc. And not only with the female friend who thinks the same way. It's feel along with each other, even if he does not feel the same as you. Create successful relationships is the key to successful teamwork. (Sílvia Rocha, "10 qualidades nas mulheres de sucesso!" - 10 qualities in successfull women -, http://silviarenatarocha.blogspot.com.br/2009/05/10-qualidades-nas-mulheres-de-sucesso.html)

As said Gilbert Keith Chesterton, feminism "is mixed up with a muddled idea that women are free when they serve their employers but slaves when they help their husbands". A loving woman at home with her husband who works and supports his family is a sluggish submissive. A loving woman on the street is a servant of machismo. In the company, she's cornerstone. A disciplined and perfectionist woman at home is a alienated housewife who do not know how she is being exploited by her husband. In the company, she is someone important for success. The woman who is master in empathizing with everyone on the street is a foolish that's servile to machismo, that if she is not "being successfull" with the cute boys. In the company, she is a successful woman. The woman being honest and looking like she is in the street is being sexually repressed by society. The woman having to do more than a man to grow up at work, feminists women only complain the difficulty of the promotion. With blacks and homosexuals is not much different.

Have you seen the Facebook profile of one of those women who conquered space in a male domain? There are two types. Type 1 is the stupid lesbian who hates criticism and spontaneously rude, perhaps with some posting against machismo, racism or homophobia from time to time. Type 2 is the professional behaved lady, never speaks of the work or the area in which she has postgraduation, almost always talking platitudes and evangelical phrases, otherwise shares ridiculous poses in wonderful places where has been or weekends with her futile female friends, pictures of her in one of those events that decide the future of the world but no one knows that are happening, photos of sons and maybe some of those tiring texts.

Who are the students who have the courage to challenge the authority of the teacher who is wrong? Who are the employees who say the boss in his face that he is wrong? In general are not the women. They care more about pleasing the teachers to maintain her scores high, and they are who more try to please the bosses. In general also are not the blacks. With much subversion, they will use an african hairstyle. In general also are not the homossexuals. These are in futile chat with sluts whenever they can, do not care about politics and not with their own work and are disgusting in terms of character. Yes, the most subversive and lovers of truth and justice people are almost all white heterosexual males. Today, let us say in passing, authentic woman is a stupid puritan and subversive woman is an hysterical lesbian.

Incidentally, with so many successful women under 30 years, with trips abroad, with fluency in two or three foreign languages, why it had to be just this poor woman here to write texts as mine against reigning mediocrity? The mistress Abigail had only 15 yo when she started, and even today women and blacks who have not appeared before come to call me racist, macho, misogynistic, homophobic, prejudiced against monogamous women, etc.

To close: do you Brazilian remember Amilton Santos?

A 53 years old man from Bahia, father of a family, without much schooling, simple conversation and affable in treatment, has faced a range of employers, challenged the court decision and followed what he believed to be the most important among humans - solidarity. Amilton Santos, in command of a tractor, was against all odds and became a hero and an example for the Brazilians.

Forced to demolish two houses that housed fifteen people in the neighborhood of Palestina [Salvador, Bahia, Brazil], he got off the tractor, wept, was threatened and pressured to comply with a court order. Cornered, he tried again, but could not get over his own belief and their own feelings.

(...) At the site, were already the two bailiffs appointed by the Forum of Salvador to fulfill the commandment of demolition of houses of Telma Sueli dos Santos Sena and Ana Célia Gomes Conceição and to ensure the repossession of the land. To ensure quiet operation, six cars of the 31st. Military Police Company and about 20 soldiers armed with handguns, shotguns and rifles, commanded by Major Castro, watched the procedures to ensure the implementation of the order issued by Judge Cláudio Fernandes de Oliveira, then proprietor of the 12th. Civil Acts Judgeship. ("Por onde anda? O herói tratorista que se recusou a demolir casas e emocionou o Brasil" - Where is he? Hero tractor driver who refused to demolish homes and emotioned Brazil -, iBahia, http://www.ibahia.com/detalhe/noticia/por-onde-anda-o-heroi-tratorista-que-se-recusou-a-demolir-casas-e-emociou-o-brasil)

If it were to have a woman, or a black, or a homosexual like mr. Amilton in each company in Brazil, or in every government office in Brazil, would be a revolution, right? Defending marijuana there are marches in the street. Defending abortion there are marches in the street. Defending women being rough and only fuck the worst men there are protests. Against feminine beauty in advertising there were an invasion in a lingerie store. But if it was for blacks, women and homosexuals do real revolution, "the powerful" would not let affirmative policies coming, right?

Eso texto en español (sin fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Concrete Paradise): Nadie es más reaccionario que un beneficiado por las políticas de discriminación positiva, http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2013/03/31/nadie-es-mas-reaccionario-que-un-beneficiado-por-las-politicas-de-discriminacion-positiva

Eso texto en español (con fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Paraíso Tangible): Nadie es más reaccionario que un beneficiado por las políticas de discriminación positiva, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2013/03/nadie-es-mas-reaccionario-que-un.html

This text in English (without sex pics and movies, at Concrete Paradise): Nobody is more reactionary than one benefited by affirmative policies, http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2013/03/31/nobody-is-more-reactionary-than-one-benefited-by-affirmative-policies

This text in English (with sex pics and movies, at Paraíso Tangible): Nobody is more reactionary than one benefited by affirmative policies, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2013/03/nobody-is-more-reactionary-than-one.html

Texto original em português (sem fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade): Ninguém é mais reacionário que um beneficiado pelas políticas afirmativas, no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade em http://avezdasmulheres.blog.com/2013/03/30/ninguem-e-mais-reacionario-que-um-beneficiado-pelas-politicas-afirmativas e no Paraíso Concreto em http://paraisoconcreto.blogspot.com/2013/03/ninguem-e-mais-reacionario-que-um.html

Texto original em português (com fotos e vídeos de putaria: Ninguém é mais reacionário que um beneficiado pelas políticas afirmativas, no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam em http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2013/03/ninguem-e-mais-reacionario-que-um.html e no Viver a Vida e Planejamento Estratégico em http://imaculadaeabigail.blogspot.com/2013/03/ninguem-e-mais-reacionario-que-um.html

Who is PROFITING with the idiotatorship and socialism? - part 1: the idiotatorship

Abigail Pereira Aranha

When a serious problem is persistent, you can see that someone not just has some gain with it as has power to leave it as is. Nowadays, it's not just find a decent TV show, a decent song, a person for a decent conversation what turned almost the work of Hercules. Say something decent is almost asking to be unknown or attacked. Say wise things or go against the prevailing imbecility was also risky. You can't talk about the contribution of First World whites without being racist. You can't reject homosexuality without being homophobic. You can't talk about the bad character of some women without being accused of bad-mouthing of all. And I'm not talking about dictatorships.

Or rather, I am talking about dictatorship. We are in the dictatorship of idiocy. Where the fool says what he or she wants and the wise have to measure words. Where freedom has ceased to be human right to be privilege of nitwits who don't know be criticized.

But who is earning something with that? The stupids who have graduated paying someone to do their works, surely, but who is interested in them?

The leftists say that the elites want a people with little schooling for it being dumb and easy to master. Know enough to work and cannot think as great people. Talk of hemp-addicted studying in College paid by daddy. First, having more than a full second degree is no longer unusual in Brazil, as it was until about 15 years ago (and the chit even had to study to be approved), and they didn't change their speech. Second, who speaks in the oppressed people go to College generally is defending quotas for poors or non-whites. Before these quotas, one only entered the higher education doing vestibular or being transferred from another college. The vestibular even could be of lower level in some educational institutions, but candidate still had to study, especially at universities that were taken seriously. With quotas, universities that were decent had students who neither would be there without the quotas, and still had to soften to pass this folks.

Most of the spaces with intellectual decency on the internet today is blogs, portals or social network personal profiles, in general of right-wingers and conservative Christians. All of them invaded by idiots who can't read two lines contrary to what they think like balanced people. The typical reaction is a woman making a comment personal attacks plus cliches in uppercase badly typed and badly punctuated, and where she says the person to better inform although she could not read what she comments.

There is a text (in Portuguese) signed by the psychiatrist and psychotherapist Edson F. Nascimento entitled "O perfil psicológico de esquerdopatas" (the psychological profile of leftopath - "leftopath" is a translation for "esquerdopata", term created by the Brazilian journalist Reinaldo Azevedo that mixes "leftist" and "psychopath") making a "curriculum" for the people on the left-wing (the text can be found for example at Papo Livre or at Grupo Terrorismo Nunca Mais). They "make vestibular without competition, preferably on a course of Geography, Social Sciences and History" (almost always true), "were lousy students (...) of middle class family "(almost always true)," feel safer to attack women, thinking that they are crazy for this kind of people "(not thinking, my dear, what's worse is that there are women who are),"don't like to study "(so "very few are in courses such as Law, Medicine, Engineering") and "dream of the proletarian 'revolution', with the seizure of power by an left elite, in which they are included, obviously" to occupy "a nominee, a commissioned officer in any Division, where they will earn a good salary". But if the text is true to the public University, and I know people there and I know that has a lot of truth, how did these guys breed there? (Breed in Double Entendre, because that medium has a lot of feminist single moms) Improving the question: who is creating Communists at universities? In part 2 I will talk about it.

The series "Who is PROFITING with the idiotatorship and socialism?"

Eso texto en español (sin fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Concrete Paradise): ¿Quién está LUCRANDO con la idiotadura y el socialismo? - parte 1: la idiotadura, http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2013/01/27/quien-esta-lucrando-con-la-idiotadura-parte-1/

Eso texto en español (con fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Paraíso Tangible): ¿Quién está LUCRANDO con la idiotadura y el socialismo? - parte 1: la idiotadura, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2013/01/quien-esta-lucrando-con-la-idiotadura-y.html

This text in English (without sex pics and movies, at Concrete Paradise): Who is PROFITING with the idiotatorship and socialism? - part 1: the idiotatorship, http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2013/01/27/who-is-profiting-with-the-idiotatorship-part-1/

This text in English (with sex pics and movies, at Paraíso Tangible): Who is PROFITING with the idiotatorship and socialism? - part 1: the idiotatorship, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2013/01/who-is-profiting-with-idiotatorship-and.html

Texto original em português (sem fotos e vídeos de putaria: Quem está LUCRANDO com a idiotadura e o socialismo? - parte 1: a idiotadura, no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade em http://avezdasmulheres.blog.com/2012/11/28/quem-esta-lucrando-com-a-idiotadura-parte-1/ e no Paraíso Concreto em http://paraisoconcreto.blogspot.com.br/2012/11/quem-esta-lucrando-com-idiotadura-e-o.html

Texto original em português (com fotos e vídeos de putaria: Quem está LUCRANDO com a idiotadura e o socialismo? - parte 1: a idiotadura, no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam em http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com.br/2012/11/quem-esta-lucrando-com-idiotadura-e-o.html e no Viver a Vida e Planejamento Estratégico em http://imaculadaeabigail.blogspot.com.br/2012/11/quem-esta-lucrando-com-idiotadura-e-o.html