The Little Boys Society - part 8: I am an anti-feminist man and I do not defend any woman, except the ones in my family

Abigail Pereira Aranha

I've seen some comments by anti-feminist boys in the last 3 months like this one: "Yes, I do defend. The women in my family: mother, wife, sisters. The others? F... them!". The problem with such a comment is that a significant part of this man's antifeminism is lost, and what remains is essentially a nineteenth-century Catholic-Protestant countryside boy revolt against the sexual rejection by the literate girls from the twenty-first century big city.

And the boy thinks he's a warrior against Feminism when he defends only the women of his own family. Boy, let's go to the Bible. Why did Simeon and Levi exterminate the Shechemites? Gen 34. Why did Potiphar make Joseph of Egypt to be arrested? Gen 39: 7 to 20. Why did Absalom ordered Amnon to be killed? 2 Sam 13: 1 to 29.

Feminism arose where and because it was viable, not because it had the need the movement says it has. Men's Human Rights Activism and, recently, female conservative antifeminism (in fact, a conservative feminism against leftist feminism), these really have sprung up for the needs they claim. If they are right the men's movement about gynocentrism and the female conservative antifeminism about the dominance of anti-Christian leftist feminism, it is consistent that mainstream media only give them sporadic spaces unwillingly or with ill intent. On the other hand, left-wing feminism is shattered as a sound idea when a woman without femininity says Brazil is macho and women-killer on a Sunday afternoon show on Rede Globo. But it is not unlikely for most men to have the thought that a proof that men find it acceptable to beat women for no reason is that a woman with little visibility on Facebook saying that false reports of violence exist (this happened to me). As well as the thought that a man who physically reacts to a woman's physical assault has done an unjustifiable assault against a fragile and angelic muse. As well as the thought that governmental and private organization campaigns against violence against women exist and are carried in the largest mass media in the country because the society finds this violence acceptable. This happens because our thinking patterns can overwhelm the logical inferences of direct observation data especially when we have enough laziness or fear to understand a projection of stupidity and prejudice over real data as if it was a direct view of reality itself.

A man defending women in the family is a man doing what the family was made for. More: that is, according to what he has learned, a man doing that for which A MAN exists. And where did he learn that? Television is from the mid-twentieth century. The feminist movement and the socialist movement are from the mid-nineteenth century. Centuries before that, we had those biblical cases that I reminded. If you do not believe the Bible (I am an atheist myself), you still believe that these cases were recorded in the first millennium BC; and you believe the ideas of the Bible are the worldview of the epoch and the place the Bible was written.

You will hear around that women only started to be respected after Christianity. But the Bible itself cites at least two pre-Christian female deities: the Queen of Heaven, from the Babylonians, in Jer 44: 15 to 19 and Diana, from the Greeks, in Acts 19: 24 to 41. But this is more than a legend from uninformed ufanist provincials. This is an example that when you believe you were born to fight against an evil, as men raised in a Christian family believe they were born to protect women from danger and discomfort, you can fight even when evil does not exist.

Why do many men advocate the death penalty or even extra-legal execution for sexual crimes by men against women if they are not crimes against life? And that anti-feminist man, "I only defend a woman if she's from my family," would he be wise considerating of the possibility that this woman is making a false accusation? Or would he go after the accused ready to be a new Potiphar or a new Emmett Till assassin? But at that epoch when men killed or died to defend wives, mothers or half-sisters, this protection was reversed when they had sexual life outside of marriage on their own initiative: Leviticus 21: 9 and Deuteronomy 22: 13 to 24. If I had born at that epoch, I would not reach 309 men (which was even more than men of the population of some cities). We have improved a lot, but in the same United States where both Feminism and male reactions to it were born, it has been proposed that a woman who has condoms in her purse be arrested for prostitution, which is a crime there. Why? The traditional Judeo-Christian family was not only created to protect the physical integrity of women in real danger and to support them, it was also made to protect them from male heterosexuality. Due to some mental confusion induced by this model, the men in charge of this protection began to treat their own heterosexuality and that of other men as despicable, clandestine and criminal.

But several men from anti-feminist communities have already committed a flawed act: they said it's no use being an old-style man to a modern woman. They confess that women change and reject archaic things as society progresses, while they themselves do not remain equal because it is not feasible today. But this "modern woman" is only a young woman between the ages of 14 and 30 with at least 6/10 beauty who is not a fervent traditional Christian or an older or uglier woman, sometimes religious, who follows lesbofeminist ideas. Women with half-masculine face and body, with uncomfortable presence, usually elderly or middle-aged Christians, these men do not criticize them and even have a moderated respect for them, especially when they preach against a fictitious or increased non-chastity in some woman who has the beauty and success they would like to have. This is the type-woman of these men's mothers or grandmothers themselves.

The conservative milieu has neither in its most cultured circle two notions which, on the left-wing, are not lacking even among the high school students: History makes no leaps and the future is the result of the actions (or lack thereof) in the past and in the present. It is not surprising to find a conservative anti-feminist man who thinks that Feminism started with a frenzy by crazy lesbians in the 1960s. Not surprisingly, conservatives want to defend the family in order to fight against leftism in general and Feminism in particular without knowing why this one exploded when the majority of the country's population was still Catholic-Protestant. And without associating the traditional families of before the twentieth century with the so-called "white knight", who is the man who defends whosoever woman just for being a woman.

The Little Boys Society - part 6: About crying, laughter, simulation and sex

Abigail Pereira Aranha

One of the most ridiculous things that we see nowadays is the series of "powerful" posts on social networks written and shared by average people. Women who are for years valuing the wrong man saying they will throw the skies over the head of her man, but they are patient; unsympathetic and ridiculous cows say to those who did not ask it that they do not care about the opinions of others, but her unexciting Facebook profile is only visible to friends; boys who are sexually unresolved and in jobs they hate say themselves strong and independent; and so on. There was a time when the theatrical inversion of the truth could be convincing. Now that we have more and more semi-literates in student bodies and faculty of universities, notoriously stupid leftists as columnists in the mainstream media and other fakers lackluster in prominent positions, some fakers can recognize themselves in the other fakers and attack themselves in each other.

Let's start analyzing this falsehood in the issue of crying. Before it, let's remember that being strong does not mean to have less or have no reason to cry, strong people only withstand more without crying or before crying. And let's also remember that men have always been those who took the heaviest services, and in the more rustic societies, were they who caught almost all manual service, and all the unhealthy service and the service with risk of death. Any ancient town smaller than a small town center today, any settlement like many in eighteenth-century Brazil or any indigenous or African village was a protection of some dangers of Nature and a place with a little more comfort. But when someone needed to get out of there, for example, for hunting, they were men. They had the tools they invented, the clothes they produced, each other and only, were they that were exposed to Nature. The women worked too, but usually within the populated place or, for example, washing clothes in the nearby stream. Ah, nowadays, there are women in the police and army. There is no police troop all-female or female majority to tackle organized crime in ghettos, for example.

Now, yes: do you know why we cry? Emotional tears discharge some hormones that cause stress, such as cortisol and corticotropin (ACTH). You can see more at "Psicobiología del Llanto" (Crying Psychobiology), by Miguel A. Requejo, Instituto Psicología Integral, at http://www.psicologointegral.com/sobre-mi/psicobiologia-del-llanto. And what do the boys learn from an early age? Men do not cry. This is not even a pretense of strength. Whimpering for manipulation is something else. Who says men don't cry wants to deny them the right to cry if they need, and when is a man, after himself accept this negative.

And the men who went to Nature for agricultural work, pastoral work, hunting work, deep sea fishing work, mineral extraction work, they were never looking for vanity, they were looking for the breadwinning of their entire country, of their community or, at least, of of their own family. We start there: in the more rustic societies, men were created for hard work, by mothers as well as by the social group. Men begin here three farcical contradictions. The first is the one of a feeling of weakness and helplessness combined with an external image which is not even of strength to overcome difficulties, it is one of less difficulties. The second is the one of the discomfort of direct exposure to the real world combined with the public image that is expected of him in the social group. The third is the one of the dedication to a work with crucial importance for the family and social life combined with a feeling of inferiority in relation to all the others.

All this inside farce of men begins with the farce of mothers, but the society also adopts three farcical contradictions of women. The first is the one that the woman who does not like sex, who does not offer sex and who flees to please men heterosexually is the truly feminine woman. The second, consequence of the first, is the one that the "goddess" is the sexually attractive woman that, with the possible exception of a husband and/or some bandits, does not have sex and flees from sex. The third is the one that the woman who is not pleasing to men physically or even is a woman with pleasant manners is more worthy of value than the woman who is. The female farce is functional and is the means of life for all women from median down, physically or mentally, and for the most of the above median women. The farce of men is only a incarnation of the farce of women.

From then on, almost all life is a farce. Have you noticed that every woman who shows herself as intelligent and well resolved dwells in an ordinary place and she is unhappy in love relationships? Have you noticed that all self-assured man had an unhappy childhood? Have you noticed that all the brave people are from the most irrelevant parts of the country or the world? More: why old age should be respected as a sign of wisdom and respectability? Or where respect for authority comes from, if not from the petitio principii that the position itself proves the expertise required to it, or even an intellectual and moral level higher than commanded in general?

If mediocre women in prominent positions are more obviously imbeciles, pathetic and without merit, it is because women meet a terror of the mother figure that hinders others to see this obvious or to say it publicly. Through it, women are less demanded, and attractive women are further spoiled by men because of male heterosexuality plus that maternal figure terror. Men are different, many of them not only build a false public image, they are also this image. Well, they are and they are not. For example, how many of the men in the 1% higher wages in Brazil or the United States make use of tranquilizers to sleep? Another example: what a high-ranking man in the public administration has been able to do and an employee who earns two minimum wages would not do even under threat of starvation or death? Another example: what an executive or a high-ranking civil servant receives of humiliations and, instead of get out of there, he rather ensure a pose that any worker who earns little, but he does not sell his dignity, wishes to be in his place?

And a jealous man accompanied with his girlfriend is the picture of male farce. First, the man has a woman aside and he acts like he had a great treasure or something like this. So he has to protect his woman. Protect of what? Ah, to protect of any man who looks at her in the streets. He sees this man and he kisses the girl to show that she is with him. Oh really? And at this point, boyfriends of beautiful women are no different than boyfriends of ugly women who are uninteresting in every aspect, because these last need such farcical inversion for themselves that it spills over to the real world. After all, they men are passionate about the minimum chance with any mediocre cow, and they women are passionate with jealous men. And this is a common man. The difference between him and the prominent man who has a number of women is that the farce of this last is multiplied.

War and violence of men against men are the evidence that many men have an animalistic concept of what is the human masculinity itself, because they were always surrounded by idiots and fakers literally from the cradle. By the way, throughout History until 2 or 3 centuries ago, humanity was able to deliver Medicine to illiterates, the Weather to religious leaders, the sciences of everyday life for unprepared people who sometimes hated science, but it took seriously war and religion. Why? Everyone was afraid of the real world, and a feeling of helplessness, the only possible power was over the neighbor.

On the violence of men against women, primarily, associate the rape to male heterosexuality is a lesbian level of stupidity. Do you know how a vaginal or anal penetration without lubrication is like? Let's assume that a particular man can be so stimulated to penetrate a woman to the force as a average man in a normal sexual intercourse or watching normal porn. It will be horrible, uncomfortable, for him and her. At least, he'll have the friction of the glans, which is the most sensitive part of the penis, with a dry vagina. The pleasure that this man will have will not be the sexual pleasure. We can see more clearly what pleasure is this in cases of collective rape in wars, which when it is not in an open place in the land of attacked people, it's in the presence of the victim's family men. This is what happens, perhaps it's less visible, in the most common cases of rape (by men against women) in Western civilization, which are the cases of demonstration of force by criminals, revenge by criminals against other criminals or revenges by more audacious men of the common people against other men. You may have noticed that I refer here to true rapes, not the rumors of cows in the periphery or fictions by sluts against their ex-husbands. The pleasure of the rapist is almost always to meet the objective of hitting other specific man, hitting men in a community in general or self-assertion through a random man. Yes, this rape of a woman was to hit another man, because a typical freeman in the history of mankind had the protection or support of a woman, who could be a wife, mother, daughter or sister, as something that defined his life itself; and even a coarse thug had his girlfriend or his "girls". But there is also a minority of cases where the rapist is had the objective of hitting the raped woman. A common case is when the author is an ex-boyfriend or an ex-husband hurt because of the end of the relationship. We can see that rape has nothing to do with male heterosexuality in the cases which the ex-boyfriend or ex-husband kills the woman before the rape. But did you notice that I said back there "violence of men against women" instead of rape? It is not because many people summarize one thing to another, it is to show how this issue is steeped in farce. If really almost all rapes are to hit other men, linked to the victims, women are a minority of the planned targets of violence in general and even rape cases themselves (by men against women). Therefore, there is a fear, even in criminals, of even thinking of attacking a woman as a direct target. This fear comes from not only the mother's terror, it also comes from the possibility of reaction of other men.

Still on violence by men against women, we will discuss sexual harassment (by men to women). Sexual harassment can be very annoying, but it is not a violence like theft, much less like a physical assault or rape. And I am not calling sexual harassment any delusions of grandeur of a lesbian who has a ridiculous body and a monkey face. The issue of sexual harassment by men to women is also steeped in farce. First, men in the general population and the judiciary defend whoever woman who says she was harassed as if they really were born for this (to defend women). Second, a common man can, let's say, defend a woman who says she was harassed by committing, then yes, a violence foreseen by law (from threat until murder). Third, and summarizing all, the horror to man was transformed into a right guaranteed by law, often while adultery (which, even reprehensible, it is consensual relationship of a married person with a third), prostitution or pornography are still crimes.

I will skip the part of why we laugh and why we love sex, hehehehe. But have you ever noticed how humorism in general is stupid? The people in general as well as the comedians in general are afraid to laugh at the ridiculous, they are afraid to laugh at ridiculous people, and they create a fake laugh. So, the public likes a program like "El Chavo del Ocho", where the joke is one depreciating the other, one hitting the other, furthermore the story itself is absurd, the characters are atypical, the dialogues are demented. Then, someone will say "El Chavo del Ocho" is good because it has neither bad word nor sex. This one did not refute whatever I said and also added two problems. The first is the idea that sex is not funny. I myself, since my parakeet has more passes than bus roulette, I have a bit of funny stories. I could also try to make jokes with other issues, but with female nudity or sex within, and the joke to be good. The second problem, and it is really a problem, is the one of bad jokes with sex appeal. And this is the same problem of nervous laughter, inventing fun where there is none to escape to laugh at other things really laughable, plus an appeal to the discontented sexuality. "El Chavo del Ocho" is from Mexico, a developing country, let us go to the United States or England: the skits recorded on the streets are for you to watch someone mocking others. For example, an actor gives an idiot scare in people passing or a sexy actress with provocative clothing makes a stupid joke with men who pass. At least in Brazil, where the situation is similar, the skits are so poor that sometimes actors are beaten or almost beaten by someone who did not like the not funny joke. After all, this humorism is not laughing with each other, is laughing at the other. Have you ever noticed too that nowadays, when the joke is good, the joker can take a lawsuit? It is because, as you may have noticed, the good humorism is the one that says a serious truth, or at least it attacks someone or something that bothers in the real world.

A question that may seem nymphomaniac, but that illustrates what is the life of pretense: why countries where supposedly people do not care about each other have laws against prostitution and pornography? More: why, in the United States, a person can be assaulted on the streets without someone to help, but a prostitute may be denounced? 1) Women who are prostitutes or who pose for erotic and pornographic materials represent the closest to "woman" in the appropriated meaning of the word, even if they are not in real life. 2) Women-mothers, who hate femininity and live through the terror of men-sons of the mother figure, hate it. 3) Men-sons also hate it, because they are not more than host bodies of the mind of women-mothers. 4) Physically attractive women do not like sex a lot more than the ugly and repulsive women, and is less likely that they dream of careers in prostitution or pornography than of a traditional marriage or a life of luxury on the back of a rich sucker. 5) The inner wounds include poor quality of sexual life, and likewise chastity is the forced glorification of sexual frustration, the imposing posture and hardness is nothing more than theatrical reversal of weak people wounded inside.

	Questo testo in italiano senza filmati di dissolutezza in Men of Worth Newspaper: "La Società degli Ragazzini - parte 6: A proposito del pianto, il riso, la simulazione e il sesso", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2016/08/la-societa-degli-ragazzini-parte-6.html.
	Questo testo in italiano con filmati di dissolutezza in Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "La Società degli Ragazzini - parte 6: A proposito del pianto, il riso, la simulazione e il sesso", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2016/08/la-societa-degli-ragazzini-parte-6.html.
	Ce texte en français sans films de libertinage au Men of Worth Newspaper: "La Société de les Gamins - partie 6: A propos de les pleurs, le rire, la simulation et le sexe", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2016/08/la-societe-de-les-gamins-partie-6.html.
	Ce texte en français avec films de libertinage au Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "La Société de les Gamins - partie 6: A propos de les pleurs, le rire, la simulation et le sexe", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2016/08/la-societe-de-les-gamins-partie-6.html.
	Eso texto en español sin películas de putaría en Men of Worth Newspaper: "La Sociedad de los Chiquitos - parte 6: Sobre el llanto, la risa, la simulación y el sexo", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2016/08/la-sociedad-de-los-chiquitos-parte-6.html.
	Eso texto en español con películas de putaría en Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "La Sociedad de los Chiquitos - parte 6: Sobre el llanto, la risa, la simulación y el sexo", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2016/08/la-sociedad-de-los-chiquitos-parte-6.html.
	This text in English without licentiousness movies at Men of Worth Newspaper: "The Little Boys Society - part 6: About crying, laughter, simulation and sex", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2016/08/the-little-boys-society-part-6.html.
	This text in English with licentiousness movies at Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "The Little Boys Society - part 6: About crying, laughter, simulation and sex", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2016/08/the-little-boys-society-part-6.html.
	Texto original em português sem filmes de putaria no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade: "A Sociedade dos Garotos - parte 6: Sobre o choro, o riso, o fingimento e o sexo", http://avezdasmulheres.over-blog.com/2016/08/a-sociedade-dos-garotos-parte-6.html.
	Texto original em português com filmes de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam: "A Sociedade dos Garotos - parte 6: Sobre o choro, o riso, o fingimento e o sexo", http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2016/08/a-sociedade-dos-garotos-parte-6.html.

The Little Boys Society - part 4: do you really know what's being a man?

Abigail Pereira Aranha

In the first time in the history of the blog A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade, I will say one good thing about women: they do not lie to themselves or believe in their own lies. What can they be doing is lying to an audience that believes the lies they tell or that, even not believing, will react as befits them. The apparent mental imbalance of most women (mixed with some real mental imbalance) is a means of action in a society they know that tolerates it. The Slut Walk is literally a image of it: they closed streets to parade half-naked, in one occasion breaking into a Catholic church in Brazil, not because Western society is so hostile to women as they say, but because they knew that they can use the emasculation or the good character of ordinary men to quell even further courage scraps and public quarrellings as the speech of the Canada policeman which supposedly was the origin of the march for four years running up to the other side of America.

In the first time in the history of the blog A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade, I will say one negative thing about men: are they (or most of them) who lie to themselves and believe in their own lies. The lie is part of life for most women, but the whole of life of most men. Women have much sense of individuality that, at one extreme, even socially and professionally outstanding women can spend more than half an hour uninterrupted talking banalities of themselves; on the other, they may resort to prostitution or to work in pornography in the absence of other income option because they know their own bodies distinguishes them of men and may be of interest to them (and, guys, let's tell the truth: brothels have a lot of woman who are bagasses).

Indeed, if man is a human male individual, we started badly from there, the individuality. Let's go to a few examples:

Building a family. A man is considered a true man, even by other men, exactly when he buries himself in a family. He was not seen as a mature man when he not lived with his parents but he was single and he had his routine of work or study, his hobby and maybe even casual sex. A man with a family is husband, father, provider, but not man. Nowadays, we can see it in a grotesque image: a family in which father, mother and sons work, the mother has her money, the sons living in the same house have their money, but the father's money belongs to all of them.

War and courage. It's right that the image of a warrior as masculinity symbol is somewhat oldfashioned. But a man shows he is more man struggling against another?

Idea of success. Any moron with a lot of money, social standing, a beautiful wife and perhaps some bonus whores, is considered successful by many other men. The worst thing is there: that ordinary men have as icon another man that they themselves know that has not his own shine. Also because even female heirs with mediocre intelligence or notorious mary-gasoline (explaining for non-Brazilians, "mary-gasoline" is a lady who only "offers herself" for men who have car) have or at least pretend to have intellectual, professional or artistic qualities.

Strength, discipline and chastity. It is almost universal among men calling discipline, which is conscious and organized dedication for a clear goal, what is merely irrational submission and self-sadism that make up a lifestyle without prospects for at least the life expectancy. And perseverance and patience, that are the inevitable waiting in the true discipline, become values in themselves in the false discipline, waiting in exchange for nothing, for repentance, for ingratitude or even for a even worse life. False discipline even today transforms entire working lives of honest men in lost time and health sustaining ungrateful communities, cretin bosses and never satisfied cows. Chastity is part of the false discipline, is disagreement between the mind and the body, is confusion of the mind itself and is also phobia (fear and loathing) of women who remember what is a truly feminine woman.

"Protection" of the daughters and sisters. Having "power" over others without having personal power is being manager. If men ruled the world as feminists men and women say, they would be right in saying that suppress women's sexual life is macho oppression. But what a bully earns chasing away other men closely his sister or daughter besides boycott the sex life of his neighbor, trying to make his life as miserable as his own? This zeal plus the false discipline that includes chastity are more than the horror of pleasure, are the real enmity against the well-being of those who do not love misery. Condemn hedonism is a cover for the envy of the erection of the neighbor.

Watching out for parents. Since the trend is women live longer than men, the sons of elderly parents will take care longer the mother than the father. When the elderly mother (may be the father, or both) are in poor health, the son either will pay someone to care for her or will adapt his life as a whole to take his mother to the hospital every month. If this son can afford to work, he will spend a good part of the salary taking care of his mother's disease. The disease, because health is gone.

The outside of work. What makes a man in the relaxation or in the weekend? When he is not an enlightened like us (hehehehe!), he is almost always doing housework, walking with his unpleasant wife and children, drinking beer, flirting bitches or consuming cultural trash. Conversations of male friends in a bar table even have usually more intelligent things and things of overall relevance than women's conversations, but most of them are about football, bitches, stupid jokes and trifles. And even when one of these men says some truth about a serious matter, he usually brings it as a personal opinion, almost apologizing.

Perhaps it was not clear what this all has to do with being a man, so I'll give an example: a certain Ruth Manus, a columnist in the Brazilian newspaper Estadão, presents herself on her blog saying he is "a lawyer and university professor. She reads Drummond, she hears pagoda, she loves chayote with bacon and departure lounges. She laughs talking about something serious. She does not miss a XV de Piracicaba against Penapolense for nothing. She has verbal incontinence, she is afraid of cow and dark circles, like everyone". It is a pathetic and disgusting egolatry, but it is a sense of individuality. Men hardly show this individuality, and most of the exception is of effeminates.

This destruction of the male individuality comes from the irresponsible violence that the insane cows with horror to sex call education, which includes incitement to stupidity, permanent criticism, depreciation of heterosexuality and, to top it off, incoherence. Surrounded by men who are servile weak or stupid pre-hominids, it is not easy for the boy to associate being a man to have identity as an individual or even to be different of the worst of the animal kingdom. If the boy only finds, out this, assholes groups whose main issues are alcohol, football and bitches, he either will try to fit in the stupefied masculinity, or will repudiate anything that takes the name of masculinity and, incidentally, the true masculinity itself, whatever it means.

Even many anti-feminist and anti-socialist men help associate not being a fool to having ways of ogre or trying to be the patriarch of the nineteenth century. In fact, when a man exalts asceticism and "rigid" raising by the typical mother of mid-twentieth century or by his in particular, he ends up showing exactly, as an example himself, the logical, moral and psychological chipping of the male and human identity of the boys that he received from his family.

	Questo testo in italiano senza filmati di dissolutezza in Men of Worth Newspaper / Concrete Paradise: La Società degli Ragazzini – parte 4: tu sai davvero cosa è essere un uomo?, http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2015/05/09/la-societa-degli-ragazzini-parte-4
	Questo testo in italiano con filmati di dissolutezza in Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía / Paraíso Tangible: La Società degli Ragazzini – parte 4: tu sai davvero cosa è essere un uomo?, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/05/la-societa-degli-ragazzini-parte-4-tu.html
	Eso texto en español sin peliculas de putaría en Men of Worth Newspaper / Concrete Paradise: La Sociedad de los Chiquitos – parte 4: ¿usted sabe realmente lo que es ser un hombre?, http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2015/05/09/la-sociedad-de-los-chiquitos-parte-4
	Eso texto en español con peliculas de putaría en Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía / Paraíso Tangible: La Sociedad de los Chiquitos – parte 4: ¿usted sabe realmente lo que es ser un hombre?, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/05/la-sociedad-de-los-chiquitos-parte-4.html
	This text in English without licentiousness movies at Men of Worth Newspaper / Concrete Paradise: The Little Boys Society – part 4: do you really know what’s being a man?, http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2015/05/09/the-little-boys-society-part-4
	This text in English with licentiousness movies at Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía / Paraíso Tangible: The Little Boys Society – part 4: do you really know what’s being a man?, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-little-boys-society-part-4-do-you.html
	Texto original em português sem filmes de putaria no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade: A Sociedade dos Garotos – parte 4: Você sabe mesmo o que é ser homem?, http://avezdasmulheres.blog.com/2015/05/02/a-sociedade-dos-garotos-parte-4
	Texto original em português com filmes de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam: A Sociedade dos Garotos – parte 4: Você sabe mesmo o que é ser homem?, http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2015/05/a-sociedade-dos-garotos-parte-4-voce.html

The Little Boys Society - part 3: The mothers and inner destruction of children

Abigail Pereira Aranha

The idea of the series "The Little Boys Society" is not to show a conspiracy of the moms for world domination. Any man who is not a feminist should have noted that even today a highlighted professionally woman, with postgraduate qualifications, with trips abroad and apparently well informed usually does not have mental balance and arguments even to answer a discordant comment of two paragraphs, especially in LGBT-Feminism. "The Little Boys Society" is more an empirical framework that serves mothers and manages to feed itself.

Any couple of unbalanced "losers" who barely tolerate one another can form a family. Or something like that. If you were God and wanted to give a child all the training necessary so he or she turns into a decent adult, he or she could be the son or daughter of very few sensible and enlightened people in the world. But if you were God and hated this same child, would suffice deliver this child to the care of any typical family.

Let us see about the importance of family?

Teaching moral values​. Out honorable exceptions of parents to really care about it, parents use the word "education" meaning forward their own ignorance and prevent children of being or knowing something better than themselves. Brazil is an illustrative example: 90% of the population is Christian and any 5 year old child is brought by his parents to church, but few people are not alcoholics, stupid or dishonest.

Discipline. What is usually called discipline or education equals orange soda: orange juice, it has, but even the taste is artificial. Any repressed anger at work or in the neighborhood can become discipline. A child could be beaten just for being left-handed and illiterate parents think that he or she uses his / her left hand as a kidding. Of course I'm not talking about honorable exceptions of parents who know the mission on their hands and what they are doing.

Responsibility. Nowadays we see a lot of single mothers who leave their small children in daycare or school enjoying it, to walk with bitches using the alimony cash. It is a grotesque example, but it seems that the big difference between the mothers of today and the ones of the past is the opportunity. And when parents say they are responsible for their children, generally refer to prohibit contacts, block internet and teach religion. Be legally responsible and pay the expenses of the children, that is only part of a mission, became a source of power to abuse of a child and an argument of any lesbian early mother from a horrible quarter who hears what she does not want to.

Sexual education. When parents, especially the mother, are interested in the children, usually they are concerned about creating people as unhappy as themselves, so when they are not only concerned in their own horror to sex and pleasure. Even the dirty history bitches make anti-sexual education of their children, perhaps they are even the most "moralistic".

The true importance of family

Teach moral bipolarity. Parents teaching their children to lie, or learning to be charged something and see parents doing another one: if not all families are like that, it does not help the defenders of the family, because a simple case of amoral parents takes away much of the meaning to submit to parents and dismantles all the praise. Children see the incoherence, and instead of hearing an argument, they get a beating.

Create scoundrels. If you know some case of child who did wrong things with a brother or sister and always got along well. You also know cases of parents who thrived doing something wrong or harvested ingratitude and villainy doing the right thing. And when the mother married deceiving her husband when she was pregnant with another man or pretending to be pregnant? Why who saw the error make profit will be interested in the path of justice?

Teach estimate family above (almost) everything. It is the grossest of self-flatteries family teaching estimation and defense of the family. Very few families can have children who achieve a decent conversation with parents, or brothers who can have fun together. The common speech of bigots that it takes patience and sacrifice to preserve marriage and family already, itself, shows that putting family first is the exaltation of vacuity based on nothing in return to continue using tolerance. In ancient times, parents should stone or cut relations with a son or daughter because he or she abandoned the religion. Some pagan religions had parents making human sacrifices of their children. In modern times, your disaffection visits your Facebook profile while your brother blocked you. And then, where is the Sunday sermon family?

Yet the true importance of family: feed reigning moral and mental poverty

Let's do a quick exercise of Statistics. Let's suppose the probability of a man or a woman to be above moral and mental mediocrity is 10%, and let us assume that the probability of a man or a woman to marry and have children is independent of being above mediocrity or not. And let's assume that the chance of a man above mediocrity marry a woman above mediocrity is 80%, and that men and women are the same number. This means that 8% of couples (80% of 10%) are above mediocrity and 4% of couples are man above mediocrity with a woman not above mediocrity or vice versa (20% of 10% for each). Well, 2 chances in 3 of a superior man and a superior woman be in family (in both senses) is still good. And we are also assuming a country where people can choose their own spouses. Where they can not, the marriage itself will be an attempt of parents to "correct" their children (no traditional Catholic father said to his son: "you, who doubts of some doctrines of the Church, will like your future wife, who is atheist, anarchist, against chastity and defender of that such open marriage"). But let's assume that the chance of a man above mediocrity marry a woman above mediocrity is 15%. Therefore, 85% of married men above the mediocrity will be married to women not above mediocrity and vice versa. So the chance of a person above the mediocrity to have a spouse who is not will be 100% × (2 × 85) / (2 × 85 + 15) = 91,9%. Well, let's also assume each man married only one woman. But it's all for show "with numbers" (in Brazil, sometimes even a collegial student asks to explain "with numbers") how people with minds above mediocrity, which are already the minority, are still intimidated by marriage. And besides the parents trying to correct their children in what they are right using some arranged marriage where this is common, or messing dating where it is not, a person above mediocrity tends to be hampered by his or her own spouse who is not in the education of his or her own son.

Families do not create women and much less men

All arguments the defenders of the family have are the responsibilities of parents about their small children, and even these are poorly accomplished. And on behalf of "pay the bills", the son of a typical family is abused physically, educationally, mentally, socially. Parents almost always only allow a child to be intellectually better and mentally healthier than themselves when they have the expectation that he or she have financial and social success, and that they themselves can take advantage of it. Otherwise, and even in some cases of this type, the unconditional love of a mother went, in the past, since treat a son's discovery that came from the use of lucidity or science as futility to deliver her own son to a death given by political or religious power, assisted or produced by a crowd of unfortunate illiterates. The family tends to turn women into mediocre maidens and men into idiots boys. The few well-adjusted, reputable and successful people because of family support are children, relatives or wives of wealthy or exceptionally wise and loving people, which just shows that the general rule is exactly the opposite. Recalling that the family is the foundation of society.

Palavras relacionadas: Dia das Mães, amor de mãe, amor verdadeiro de mãe, família em primeiro lugar, preservar a família, filhos saudáveis, criação de filhos, sabedoria dos pais, ouvir os idosos

Related words: Mother's Day, Mother's Love, true mother's love, family first, preserving the family, healthy children, raising children, parental wisdom, listen to the elderly

Parole correlate: Festa della Mamma, amore di mamma, vero amore della madre, la famiglia in primo luogo, preservando la famiglia, bambini sani, educazione dei figli, la saggezza dei genitori, ascoltare gli anziani

Palabras relacionadas: Día de la Madre, el amor de madre, amor verdadero de la madre, de la familia en primer lugar, la preservación de la familia, los niños sanos, crianza de los hijos, la sabiduría de los padres, escuchar a los ancianos

Questo testo in italiano senza foti e filmati di sesso, in Men of Worth Newspaper / Concrete Paradise: La Società degli Ragazzini - parte 3: Le madri e la distruzione interiore dei bambini, http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2014/05/10/la-societa-degli-ragazzini-parte-3

Questo testo in italiano con foti e filmati di sesso, in Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía / Paraíso Tangible: La Società degli Ragazzini - parte 3: Le madri e la distruzione interiore dei bambini, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2014/05/la-societa-degli-ragazzini-parte-3-le.html

Eso texto en español sin fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Men of Worth Newspaper / Concrete Paradise: La Sociedad de los Chiquitos – parte 3: Las madres y la destrucción interna de los niños, http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2014/05/10/la-sociedad-de-los-chiquitos-parte-3

Eso texto en español con fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía / Paraíso Tangible: La Sociedad de los Chiquitos – parte 3: Las madres y la destrucción interna de los niños, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com.br/2014/05/la-sociedad-de-los-chiquitos-parte-3.html

This text in English without sex pics and movies, at Men of Worth Newspaper / Concrete Paradise: The Little Boys Society - part 3: The mothers and inner destruction of children, http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2014/05/10/the-little-boys-society-part-3

This text in English with sex pics and movies: The Little Boys Society - part 3: The mothers and inner destruction of children, at Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía / Paraíso Tangible, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com.br/2014/05/the-little-boys-society-part-3-mothers.html

Texto original em português sem fotos e vídeos de putaria: A Sociedade dos Garotos - parte 3: As mães e a destruição interior dos filhos, no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade, http://avezdasmulheres.blog.com/2014/05/10/a-sociedade-dos-garotos-parte-3

Texto original em português com fotos e vídeos de putaria: A Sociedade dos Garotos - parte 3: As mães e a destruição interior dos filhos, no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam, http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com.br/2014/05/a-sociedade-dos-garotos-parte-3-as-maes.html e no Viver a Vida e Planejamento Estratégico, http://imaculadaeabigail.blogspot.com/2014/05/a-sociedade-dos-garotos-parte-3-as-maes.html

La serie La Società degli Ragazzini senza fotos e filmati di dissolutezza

La serie La Società degli Ragazzini con fotos e filmati di dissolutezza

La serie La Sociedad de los Chiquitos sin fotos e peliculas de putaría

La serie La Sociedad de los Chiquitos con fotos e peliculas de putaría

The series The Little Boys Society without sex pics and movies

The series The Little Boys Society with sex pics and movies

A série A Sociedade dos Garotos sem fotos e vídeos de putaria

A série A Sociedade dos Garotos com fotos e vídeos de putaria no Viver a Vida e Planejamento Estratégico

A série A Sociedade dos Garotos com fotos e vídeos de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam

The Little Boys Society - Part 2: men do not please women for sex (wish if it was so)

Introduction

What explains kind, ethical, intelligent, hardworking men being treated as human beings of inferior class for almost all women they know? Even worse, why do they allow it, or even seek it?

A man may think, for example, that without women, money would lose its meaning, which is what Aristotle Onassis once said. A man can pretend to be gay just to have more female friends and, hopefully, have sex with at least one of them. A man can pay to go to places poorly maintained and badly frequented only by the possibility of leaving there with any ugly bitch who was his 10th attempt in the "fun". And the anti-feminists here in Brazil have experienced and reported that men columnists in the press or widely read bloggers can make personal attacks against men who denounce the evils of feminism or the knaveries by women in general (like them) just to please the girls that read them. Previously, men who were interested in a woman allowed on themselves the eavesdropping from her entire family just to marry her, which in principle would mean not only having sex only with her just like almost not having a close relationship with another woman. But the worst is not it.

Almost all men are able to avoid or to harm themselves or others just to try to please a woman for nothing in return.

Is there a man worst than pussy slave? Yes

We'll have to give this sad news for those who think the pussy slave is the worst level of man. The slave pussy, even if he makes insanities because of a woman, spend money on books or courses on seduction, do a college course just to get out of a nightclub in a luxury car with some gasoline-mary by his side or even pretend to be gay just to conquer a woman, at least he has a goal. A poor goal, but a goal that is a reference. Even though this sub-man can marry any mediocre woman (in body, sexual performance and attitude) and find himself rewarded by God for this, he can still realize that in 5 or 10 years of his life he did unfortunate things for a particular woman, for several women or just to have a woman and got nothing worth everything, or even lost so much in it. Just remember that the scoundrel, as someone already pointed out, is also a slave to pussy, but he's like the drug addict who has drug at will. But there are three kinds of men below it in dignity: the gay-friend, the mangina and the doormat. None of them have sexual purpose. It's not that sex is the best that a man can earn from the woman, or the man who does not want sex from a woman may not want anything more. I will better explain what the problem.

The gay-friend is like the guy who tries to befriend a woman for have sex with or date her, but worse. For him comment in a conversation with a close friend that his female friend is hot or he is almost taking her to bed, he still has to improve. Maybe he finds his sweet friend beautiful or sexy, but rather preserve the friendship to try something. He contains in any word or gesture that his sweet friend can understand something displeasing her, especially those that seem to have sexual reference. He meets his sweet friend in her most stupid crazes and her wildest desires of flattery. He gives too much more than he receives, but is content with little things, like a superficial compliment or a feeling of being useful.

Mangina, for those not familiar with the term, is the junction with man and vagina, is the man who exalts and overvalues ​​women just for being women. The mangina can be of two types: the feminist and the macho. The feminist mangina is like a lesbonazist woman in a man's body. Publish on Facebook or e-mail campaigns against violence against women (that violence where what matters is the sex of who says herself victim) or calling for marches against machismo in the media and advertising, but does not know there is the International Day of Man, or why it is important. He has not his own identity or the libido of being in a feminist march thinking of picking up a women. He even has the sexual desire that some gay-friends have for their friends. As any feminist, he does not know the difference between admiring a woman sexually and fantasize a sexual assault.

The macho mangina is archaic macho. Conservatives men until the middle of the twentieth century has driven away many poor nice guys who wanted to marry their daughters or sisters, or just have a friendship (or even fuck too, so what?). If these women liked guys like that, why they were not with them on the sly? The men forced the boyfriend of the daughter or sister to marry her because she was pregnant or just no longer a virgin. How many girls said "nevermind", "I ate green papaya" or "he eats papaya seed" (yeah, folks, in the Greek Empire and the Roman Empire also existed contraceptives and abortifacients)? The old machismo was always pleasant or helpful to women, or at least did more good than harm to them almost everytime. A man would rather condemn prostitution at day and looking for it at night to let anyone think that he was not contrary to it. But men was not dominating the world? To whom they were pretending, damn? Things that could be understood as sexual or rude were suppressed by men to not to offend women, remember?

The doormat is the man who endures an unpleasant life without great expectations, relating to women or life. He is the underpaid worker in a hateful workplace surrounded by unbearable people, usually married with a paunchy unfriendly and arrogant woman. If he has a life project, it is to preserve that job that bores him, live with minimal hassles possible with the ugly wife and raise children so that they have enough success to sustain him when he is old, all while pretending to have better quality of life and power than he really has. He can be more lucky and have a much better economic and professional level, but if he has any expectation better that the underpaid employee quoted above, is to be able to maintain the structure that allows him to pretend to be better and more worthy of envy than the other. A mangina still have happiness with the well-being of a particular woman or women in general, even if he loses more than he gains. A doormat has a good feel reminding it when he receives a superficial praise from his old lesbian and deformed boss at work or when he realizes or remembers that some badly succeded, sometimes thousands or millions of them, think that he is more successful than them. Even a gay-friend or a mangina can cause him envy.

These three types of man can bust or be destroyed by one or more women or the feminine universe in general without realizing that something should not be that way.

The man builds himself, but the boy is the foundation

And where the gay-friend, the mangina or the doormat come from? He can consolidate in the streets, by idiotization by mass media, in the feminist-homosexualist social movements, but he begins at home. It is no coincidence that the doormat was always the most common type of man. In part 3 I'll talk more about it.

Almost any family, or even a single mother, can teach a boy to work, to endure suffering, to get food or to do something to get somewhere in life. But almost never a man can in the family develop some self-esteem or learn to relate to women in a productive way. Let us observe that when a man says he became what he is as a person because of what he received from the family is almost always lying, forgetting important friends outside the family, or he is just a bourgeois having a moral glory-to-God-and-the-soften-dick. When a man learns from parents about chastity and self-control, is to "keep himself" until marriage, to limiting sex life within marriage or to not to be destroyed by sex outside or before marriage. But not so he can enjoy best of sexuality and life in general. And a man can make good life, including sexually, without this nitpicking of one woman for life, I am witness, hehehehe.

Let us remember that the first woman in a man's life is the mother. When the boy reaches adolescence and begins to take an interest in girls, he has a history with women that is primarily with his mother, his sisters, some women of the family and a few childhood friends. He will change the view on women at puberty, yes, but this change will be on top of the old image. The teenager will mix with the man with the son, and he will spend adolescence between boys who are almost certain to be as misguided as he is. So, it is expected that a man who had a horrible mother, for example, have an attitude of fear or anger with women in general. Will be the loose or scoundrel husband, or even sexual maniac.

Women than men value most are the least attractive women

You probably know an ugly and disagreeable woman, or at most with little of good manners, that all men or avoid as much as possible but try not to displease or treat with respect. Well, people, woman is still a physically weaker human being and attractive to human male. So, if you, man, are afraid of a woman, afraid to show you consider her attractive or think she is repulsive but try to live with her, you are not seeing this woman as a woman.

Got it now? Boy, you look at a woman, admire her ass, admire her breasts, admiring her delicate features, admiring her softer voice, you want to hug, you want to kiss, you want to... Oh, macho view that society has of women. People, woman is not just for this, of course, but feminine woman also has it all, right? So, if you know someone named woman who you do not look, square body, you hate when she will talk to you, you hate when you have to talk to her, and half of guys you know are more feminine than her, what she has of a woman? And why you can stand it (besides perhaps because of being required)?

You, man, do you remember when they talk about respecting your girlfriend as if she was your sister or an older woman as if she was your mother? In the first place, what has to do respect with soften cock? And have you tried it and seen how it takes away the excitement? It is because sister or mother is not woman, is a separate entity. The mother is the person who gave the first sex education class for the boy: that warm sex life of mom and dad is a thing that can not be commented. Sister is often best treated by the mother than the sons. And throughout childhood, where not only the ideas as even the boy's brain are being formed, he will generally have as reference mediocre and unsympathetic females. Women who are right even erroneous, even with bad character win, even crazy have reason, even if they cause expendable pains did the best. Anything better than that is pure luck. After puberty, a man can even do crazy to the first woman with feminine traits he find, and he will think then how can do "that", but even sexual excitement will not take him to destroy himself as an individual. And to destroy himself as an individual, being a zombie who does things he does not like to get or keep a job he likes even less living inside and outside of work with unpleasant people, is what men most do. By fear, low self-esteem or custom, this man will endure what he knows he should not from women who not please him only to avoid hassles.

And it is an pride for him to reject the remote chance of sex with any woman who does not look like a bad fake man and overcome with lust. It is the victory over the last aspect in what he could see a woman as a woman and as a human being like him. And this, of course, after the wedding that not long ago he did not even choose his own wife.

If a woman cause you fear, sense of obligation or sense of forced living with, you may be looking at her and seeing your mother or your sister.

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Questo testo in italiano senza foti e filmati di sesso, in Men of Worth Newspaper / Concrete Paradise: La Società degli Ragazzini - parte 2: gli uomini non piacciono le donne per il sesso (magari se era così), http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2014/05/10/la-societa-degli-ragazzini-parte-2

Questo testo in italiano con foti e filmati di sesso, in Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía / Paraíso Tangible: La Società degli Ragazzini - parte 2: gli uomini non piacciono le donne per il sesso (magari se era così), http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2014/05/la-societa-degli-ragazzini-parte-2-gli.html

Eso texto en español (sin fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Concrete Paradise): La Sociedad de los Chiquitos - Parte 2: Los hombres no agradan a las mujeres para el sexo (ojalá si era así), http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2012/11/30/la-sociedad-de-los-chiquitos-parte-2

Eso texto en español (con fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Paraíso Tangible): La Sociedad de los Chiquitos - Parte 2: Los hombres no agradan a las mujeres para el sexo (ojalá si era así), http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com.br/2012/11/la-sociedad-de-los-chiquitos-parte-2.html

This text in English (without sex pics and movies, at Concrete Paradise): The Little Boys Society - Part 2: men do not please women for sex (wish if it was so), http://avezdoshomens2.blog.com/2012/11/30/the-little-boys-society-part-2

This text in English (with sex pics and movies, at Paraíso Tangible): The Little Boys Society - Part 2: men do not please women for sex (wish if it was so), http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com.br/2012/11/the-little-boys-society-part-2-men-do.html

Texto original em português (sem fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade): A Sociedade dos Garotos - parte 2: Os homens não agradam as mulheres por sexo (antes fosse), http://avezdasmulheres.blog.com/2012/11/30/a-sociedade-dos-garotos-parte-2

Texto original em português (com fotos e vídeos de putaria: A Sociedade dos Garotos - parte 2: Os homens não agradam as mulheres por sexo (antes fosse), no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam em http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com.br/2012/11/a-sociedade-dos-garotos-parte-2-os.html e no Viver a Vida e Planejamento Estratégico em http://imaculadaeabigail.blogspot.com.br/2012/11/a-sociedade-dos-garotos-parte-2-os.html

La serie La Società degli Ragazzini senza fotos e filmati di dissolutezza

La serie La Società degli Ragazzini con fotos e filmati di dissolutezza

La serie La Sociedad de los Chiquitos sin fotos e peliculas de putaría

La serie La Sociedad de los Chiquitos con fotos e peliculas de putaría

The series The Little Boys Society without sex pics and movies

The series The Little Boys Society with sex pics and movies

A série A Sociedade dos Garotos sem fotos e vídeos de putaria

A série A Sociedade dos Garotos com fotos e vídeos de putaria no Viver a Vida e Planejamento Estratégico

A série A Sociedade dos Garotos com fotos e vídeos de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam