Olavo de Carvalho connects atheism to lack of sex and he takes a philosophical diary on his forehead

Olavo de Carvalho

October 19, 2016 at 04:21 AM

I do not know - and I suspect even that has ever existed - one only atheist whose hatred against religion was not born from a teenage revolt against the limitations it imposes to his longing for sexual satisfaction. All the atheistic arguments, including the more scientific in appearance, are nothing more than a system of rationalizations built upon sexual desires which are really or supposedly threatened by religious morality.

When the guy matures and finally comes to understand that sexual frustration is inherent in human destiny and it's independent of the greater or lesser current amount of tolerance in society, it's too late to change his mind, because the atheistic arguments, devoid of all its previous defensive function, is already integrated into the creature's personality as an unuprootable habit.

Fábio Pinheiro Povh I do not know - and I suspect even that has ever existed - one only religious whose hatred against atheism was not born from a teenage revolt against the limitations it imposes to his emotional insecurities. All the religious arguments, including the more scientific in appearance, are nothing more than a system of rationalizations built upon his insecurities [which are really] or supposedly threatened by logic. When the guy matures and finally comes to understand that his emotional insecurity is inherent in human destiny and it's independent of the greater or lesser current amount of rationality in society, it's too late to change his mind, because the religious argumentation, devoid of all its previous soothing function, is already integrated into the creature's personality as an unuprootable habit.

October 19 at 05:30 AM

(https://www.facebook.com/carvalho.olavo/posts/716314711853939?comment_id=716342011851209)

Victória Ortiz Oliveira I becoming an atheist at age 11 must have been the result of sexual frustrations, really. AHUAHUAHUA

October 21, 2016 at 00:43 PM

(https://www.facebook.com/carvalho.olavo/posts/716314711853939?comment_id=717360121749398)

Alessandro Hoffelder Notice: what the text says is that all atheists are declared perverted and all religious are closeted perverts. Easy to generalize, no?

October 19 at 08:06 AM

(https://www.facebook.com/carvalho.olavo/posts/716314711853939?comment_id=716405181844892)

Vivian Mansano I'm laughing here. The Bible talks more about sex than any book, it talks about killing homosexuals, killing adulterers, killing women who lost virginity. Christianity invented that we can not use contraception, that sex is only for reproduction, that sex is sin and celibacy is good. But wait! Are atheists who have sexual problems? People, how this guy "travels in mayonnaise".

October 21, 2016 at 07:36 AM

(https://www.facebook.com/carvalho.olavo/posts/716314711853939?comment_id=717516971733713)

My comments

Well, as the teacher connected atheism to shamelessness and I preach both, it caught my attention. Let's assume that what he said was what happened to me, for example, and further, that this has happened to all the atheists. Is it possible someone tell isolated truths within a book with a thinking line all wrong? Is it possible a person to find out the truth through a philosophical system which began with spurious reasons? Is it possible to discover a truth starting with the belief in a lie that was discarded in the meantime? A truth or a valid philosophical system still retains its value if the one who defends them began to discover them through a personal experience? And, above all, a great truth can be discovered with the perception of a little truth? Prof. Olavo, as a philosopher, knows that the answers to these questions are "yes".

If, to a conservative like him, Socialism is an atheistic system, how does he explain it, written by himself?

Until the 80s of last century, programs like sex lib, feminism, gayzism, abortionism and liberation of drugs were, to the Communist governments, petty-bourgeois deviation created by the Yankee imperialists to ward youth of the struggle for Socialism.

"Intimação" (Subpoena), Diário do Comércio, São Paulo, December 03, 2015.

By the way, where are the prostitution and pornography in China, or Cuba, or North Korea? Another: this explanation of atheism is consistent with the case of the Soviet Union, told by himself in another article?

Karl Radek, one of the 1917 Communist uprising mentors, was also a pioneer of the sexual revolution. His campaign against "bourgeois morality", his appeals to free love pervaded revolutionary propaganda such a way, that a whole generation of young misfits, children of single mothers, came to be known as "the offspring of Karl Radek". Later, this man fell into disgrace, as so many parents of the Revolution. Stalin, in a black humor bid, put him in prison for juvenile delinquents, which made the old revolutionary, already sick and broken, their favorite punching bag. Karl Radek died beaten and trampled by the children of their sexual revolution.

(...) Well, gentlemen, these same that led you to be ashamed of your old "bourgeois morality" and advised you to turn your media outlets in the megaphones for the porno-cultural revolution know that you only are useful to them in a part of the path. When they are confident in control police power, they will shut the TV channels and newspapers of which they served themselves, and they will accuse you of corrupting the morals, of encouraging bad habits. Then it will be too late to learn from the example of Karl Radek.

"Lembrem-se de Karl Radek" (Remember Karl Radek), Jornal do Brasil, May 31, 2007.

It may even be true that "sexual frustration is inherent in human destiny". I myself have had men running away from me or who still have a good relationship with me, but I want to "give" to them and they do not want to fuck me. But the almost medieval level of sexual frustration that prof. Olavo advocates is optional. Some pastors, priests and Christian preachers tell on books or sermons that they had girls wanting to have sex with them and they refused, and this were not a few times (I am believing in what they tell, hehehehe).

If the prof. Olavo want to disprove Atheism, let him stop speaking as a Catholic. It's as a Catholic he says "religion" when he means "Roman Catholicism" (only in the New Testament, Christians were surrounded by more permissive religions at least in Rome, Corinth and Ephesus). It's as a Catholic he exalts the poor quality of life, not merely sexual frustration, as a refined lifestyle. Then I am a girl age 14 and I think: what is the reason why I will lock my parakeet? Let me want to have sex with one boy only, and he is one that I love and with whom I want to have children and to share the rest of my life. Why not to have sex with him in dating? So, I live in a Catholic small town and the answer I get is closeted envy of old cows, moral illiteracy, social isolation, threats of aggression. And the nice thing is that the stupid answers bring me intelligent questions. Another interesting thing: it is not only the religion of my neighborhood, all religions are this level downwards. Then I become an atheist. If in these adventures, I start smoking marijuana, I'll end up stopping; if I get into the leftist feminist activism, I'll see the crap and I will get out; I can even, for example, have sex with three men at once and to regret at this time. But why will I leave Atheism? Why should I believe in the Bible and not in Buddha's Doctrine? That young girl and that old lady who attend that church, they have something that I have not and I would like to have? Or I have a better quality of life than them?

And it's OK, I love sucking dick, riding with a dick in my pussy, to take two or three dicks at once, etc. And already were 269 boys to date. And I'm an atheist just because I know that God does not exist. I criticize the atheistic militancy because it is a LGBT Movement branch, as said Denner Coutinho. And I'm anti-leftist because the leftist movement does not advocate sexual freedom as a principle, at maximum some few things to shock the Catholic-Protestant peasants.

Finally, as they would say on Facebook, bring two oscars for each one of those myths, the second in case they lose the first.

Abigail Pereira Aranha

	Questo testo in italiano senza filmati di dissolutezza in Men of Worth Newspaper: "Olavo de Carvalho collega l'ateismo alla mancanza di sesso e prende un diario filosofico nella fronte", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2016/10/olavo-de-carvalho-collega-l-ateismo-alla-mancanza-di-s.html.
	Questo testo in italiano con filmati di dissolutezza in Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Olavo de Carvalho collega l'ateismo alla mancanza di sesso e prende un diario filosofico nella fronte", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2016/10/olavo-de-carvalho-collega-lateismo-alla.html.
	Ce texte en français sans films de libertinage au Men of Worth Newspaper: "Olavo de Carvalho relie l'athéisme au manque de sexe et il prend un journal intime philosophique sur son front", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2016/10/olavo-de-carvalho-relie-l-atheisme-au-manque-de-s.html.
	Ce texte en français avec films de libertinage au Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Olavo de Carvalho relie l'athéisme au manque de sexe et il prend un journal intime philosophique sur son front", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2016/10/olavo-de-carvalho-relie-latheisme-au.html.
	Eso texto en español sin películas de putaría en Men of Worth Newspaper: "Olavo de Carvalho conecta el ateísmo a la falta de sexo y lleva un diario filosófico en la frente", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2016/10/olavo-de-carvalho-conecta-el-ateismo-a-la-falta-de-s.html.
	Eso texto en español con películas de putaría en Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Olavo de Carvalho conecta el ateísmo a la falta de sexo y lleva un diario filosófico en la frente", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2016/10/olavo-de-carvalho-conecta-el-ateismo-la.html.
	This text in English without licentiousness movies at Men of Worth Newspaper: "Olavo de Carvalho connects atheism to lack of sex and he takes a philosophical diary on his forehead", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2016/10/olavo-de-carvalho-connects-atheism-to-lack-of-s.html.
	This text in English with licentiousness movies at Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Olavo de Carvalho connects atheism to lack of sex and he takes a philosophical diary on his forehead", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2016/10/olavo-de-carvalho-connects-atheism-to.html.
	Texto original em português sem filmes de putaria no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade: "Olavo de Carvalho liga o ateísmo a falta de sexo e toma um diário filosófico na testa", http://avezdasmulheres.over-blog.com/2016/10/olavo-de-carvalho-liga-o-ateismo-a-falta-de-s.html.
	Texto original em português com filmes de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam: "Olavo de Carvalho liga o ateísmo a falta de sexo e toma um diário filosófico na testa", http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2016/10/olavo-de-carvalho-liga-o-ateismo-falta.html.

By friends of Abigail: accepting that God never existed

	O bom uso da razão exige que descartemos afirmações sobre fatos que são inconsistentes, incoerentes ou mutuamente excludentes. Pelo bom uso da razão, trabalhamos para que o mundo faça sentido pelo que ele é e não como gostaríamos que ele fosse. Ainda assim, é mais reconfortante vislumbrar um mundo onde há um protetor divino que toma conta de seus filhos e sempre sabe mais que ninguém o que está fazendo. Isso é NEGAR A REALIDADE. Não aceitar pelo menos a possibilidade de que ELE NUNCA EXISTIU demonstra que as pessoas recorrem à intervenção divina por outros motivos que não são de maneira nenhuma racionais.
	The proper use of reason requires us to discard statements about facts that are inconsistent, incoherent or mutually exclusive. By the proper use of reason, we work for the world to make sense for what it is and not as we wish it to be. Still, it's more comforting envisioning a world where there is a divine protector who takes care of their children and always knows more than anyone what he is doing. This is DENYING REALITY. Not accepting at least the possibility that HE NEVER EXISTED shows that people resort to divine intervention for other reasons that are not in any way rational.
	L'uso corretto della ragione richiede di scartare le dichiarazioni su fatti che sono incompatibili, incoerenti o escludono reciprocamente. Con l'uso corretto della ragione, noi lavoriamo a dare al mondo un senso per quello che è e non come vorremmo che fosse. Eppure, è più confortante immaginare un mondo in cui vi è un protettore divino che si prende cura dei loro figli e sa sempre più di chiunque quello che sta facendo. Questo è NEGARE LA REALTÀ. Non accettare almeno la possibilità che non LUI È MAI ESISTITO mostra che le persone ricorrono all'intervento divino per altri motivi che non sono in alcun modo razionali.
	El uso adecuado de la razón nos obliga a descartar afirmaciones sobre hechos que son inconsistentes, incoherentes o mutuamente excluyentes. Por el buen uso de la razón, trabajamos para que el mundo tenga sentido por lo que es y no como nos gustaría que fuera. Aún así, es más reconfortante imaginar un mundo donde hay una divinidad protectora que cuida de sus hijos y siempre sabe más que nadie lo que está haciendo. Esto es NEGAR LA REALIDAD. No aceptar al menos la posibilidad de que ELLA NUNCA EXISTIÓ muestra que la gente recurre a la intervención divina por otras razones que no son de ninguna manera racionales.

	Você pode se enganar, acreditando que Deus... - tem um plano - sabe o que faz - trabalha de maneira misteriosa - não dá o que você quer e sim o que você precisa - está no controle - não interfere no livre arbítrio - escreve certo por linhas tortas - quando fecha uma porta, abre uma janela ou aceitar que Ele nunca existiu! (Chacon Alexandre, https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=823624111059307&set=a.216861795068878.53399.100002351785576&type=1)
	You can deceive yourself, believing that God... - has a plan - know what He makes - works in mysterious ways - does not give you what you want but what you need - is in the control - does not interfere in free will - writes straight in crooked lines - when a door closes, He opens a window or accept that He never existed! (Chacon Alexandre, https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=823624111059307&set=a.216861795068878.53399.100002351785576&type=1)
	Tu puoi illuderti, credendo che Dio... - ha un piano - sa quello che fa - opera in modi misteriosi - non ti dà ciò che tu vuoi, ma quello che tu hai bisogno - è nel controllo - non interferisce in libero arbitrio - scrive dritto in linee storte - quando una porta si chiude, apre una finestra o accettare che Egli non è mai esistito! (Chacon Alexandre, https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=823624111059307&set=a.216861795068878.53399.100002351785576&type=1)
	Usted puede engañar a ti mismo, creyendo que Dios... - tiene un plan - sabe lo que hace - trabaja de maneras misteriosas - no le da lo que usted quiere, pero lo que usted necesita - está en el control - no interfiere en el libre albedrío - escribe derecho en lineas torcidas - cuando una puerta se cierra, abre una ventana o aceptar que Él nunca existió! (Chacon Alexandre, https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=823624111059307&set=a.216861795068878.53399.100002351785576&type=1)

We are superior, we don't have sex

Eso texto en español (sin fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Paraíso Tangible en Wordpress): Somos superiores, no tenemos relaciones sexuales, http://avezdoshomens2.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/somos-superiores-no-tenemos-relaciones/

Eso texto en español (con fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Para Hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas): Somos superiores, no tenemos relaciones sexuales, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2012/01/somos-superiores-no-tenemos-relaciones.html

This text in English (without sex pics and movies, at Paraíso Tangible): We are superior, we don’t have sex, http://avezdoshomens2.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/we-are-superior-we-dont-have-s/

This text in English (with sex pics and movies, at Para Hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas): We are superior, we don't have sex, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2012/01/we-are-superior-we-dont-have-sex.html

Texto original em português (sem fotos e vídeos de putaria, no O Reino de Deus): Somos superiores, não fazemos sexo, http://oreinodedeus.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/somos-superiores-nao-fazemos-s/

Texto original em português (com fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam): Somos superiores, não fazemos sexo, http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2012/01/somos-superiores-nao-fazemos-sexo.html

If we don't have sex, we are disciplined. Because we can deny ourselves a pleasure and do something nasty and unreasonable without a reasonable explanation.

If we don't have sex, we are wise. Because we can do nasty things for ourselves or for another person with or without fruit for good or for bad reasons.

If we don't have sex, we're professionals. Because we can focus our lack of sex for the study or for the work and be better even where it does not bring any kind of recognition.

If we don't have sex, we have character. We discourse on ethics, moral or about who deserves to escape an eternity of torment, and we even do something for someone, even if our minds are full of stupidity, prejudice and mainly hatred for those who is nobler and happier than we are.

If we don't have sex, we have principles. Aversion to sex, religious bigotry, willful ignorance, horror of pleasure and envy of any bit of happiness and greatness of spirit of another ones with a covering of good deeds to make a good public image.

If we don't have sex, we are reliable. For lack of sex is equivalent to moral principles and balance.

If we don't have sex, we are women who deserve respect. A sympathetic woman is a bitch or isn't serious, a inteligent woman is unbearable, but we deserve respect for our angry face and our narrow mind.

If we don't have sex, we have a commendable conduct. Because a decent sex life in quality and quantity is a pretty insult from those who do not have the guts for it against those who have.

If we don't have sex, we have built our country. Because all oppressive governments make sexual repression together with political repression, and to the citizen rests to denounce the neighbor to the police, hate the rebels and use the work to ease his or her frustrations.

If we don't have sex, we are among the pillars of the world. Because the sexual liberality is so destructive to societies as the end of slavery or the true democracy.

If we don't have sex, we are exemplary people. Where a politician steals public money and everyone knows, where addicts use drugs on the street and especially where those who criticize the government or the religion has no right to anything.

If we like pornography, we are perverted, nymphomaniacs, untrustworthy, we do not have respect for ourselves, we approve the disrespect for women and we can not have anything profitable in our heads.

If we have sex without marriage, God will send us a venereal disease. Because venereal disease is not a disease like cholera or measles, is a punishment from God against those who despise chastity.

If we have sex without marriage, we fail in doing something important. We will not have the focus to do something to enlarge our own egoes, provide the carreer of idiots or take damage for the "nation" if we are playing with three cocks at the same time or if we did not bother thinking about it.

If we have sex without marriage, we are selfish. Not because we think only in our pleasure, but because we don't forbid ourselves to feel good really.

If we have sex without marriage, we are immature. Because we fucking with one man today and with two at the same time tomorrow we can not be thinking about the consequences (disease, pregnancy, unemployment, jail, or stoning).

With love (with one fucking doggystyle and with the cock in the mouth),

Abigail Pereira Aranha

The world is in moral decay, then it chases the atheism and the s...

When a society is in moral decay, it chases atheism, nudity and sex. Have you noticed that almost every motherfucker is devout and moralistic?

The people are capable of supporting a dictatorship, theocratic or not, entitled to censorship on the internet, if to preserve traditional values, of lack of sex and contact between man and woman.

In the late nineteenth century, some pornographic movies were only strip scenes and even kisses. Meanwhile, Catholics denied medical care, school, burial and retail sales for Protestants.

A child or teen can already learn to hate who is of another race, another country or another religion, or to learn the bunch of hypocrites, idiot, without-sex blessed of the religion of the parents are the only in human race with ethical principles. All this while not old enough to see a kiss on the mouth or the body of someone of the opposite sex.

A politician can be a thief, corrupt, authoritarian, even murderous. But he can not be an atheist or betray his wife. And the former municipal manager Scott Janke, of Fort Myers Beach, Florida (USA), was fired because his wife Anabela Mota Janke, is porn star, and they had to leave town.

Stoning for sex outside of marriage is a matter of national culture and sovereignty. But after the teacher Tiffany Shepherd posed in a bikini on a boat, that was her school's bussiness and she was fired, she failed another job despite having sent 2,500 resumes and she turned porn star.

A company can mistreat its employees, pay poorly, impose journeys above the law and delay wages. But when TAM found that flight attendant Priscila Cabral posed nude for a magazine, it felt "morally offended," and the poor could not work in another airline.

A religious dictatorship that goes against human rights, religious freedom, freedom of expression and sex is right of the country's people who live in this misery. But an atheist government is sexually liberal, without ethical principles and genocidal.

In some countries, a prostitute and her client can be killed or split a jail with thieves and murderers. While those with money or power escapes from jail.

Television can alienate the people and distort the news. Indecent is a program with scantily clad women.

The city knows that John is drug dealer, is hired assassin or diverts public money, but Maria have to hide that dreams of fucking with two men at the same time. And she can not be seen watching a porn movie, as happened with the American Nicole Ann Altendorf, who was sentenced to a year of probation for watching a porn movie with the window open, allowing that it could be seen and heard by students of a school.

Marry a man well off pregnant of some cad is a good deal, but open marriage is a indecency.

A woman can be respected after she gets ahead on the back of a rich ex-husband of a well off sucker for who she spread her legs, but it is absurd if she is a porn actress.

A woman can have sex to get ahead or to win gifts, but she can not have sex for horny.

The society thinks the character maximum for a woman is to be a "decent lady", which is nothing more than a hypocritical bitch or stupid ugly woman who is envious of every woman who attracts a man.

Being hypocritical is a virtue. Being dishonest is cunning. Even get ahead spreading her legs is intelligence. But to like sex seems to be the worst of the vices.

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Translated from http://oreinodedeus.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/o-mundo-em-decadencia-moral/.