Machismo was created by women - Part 1: How started machismo

Eso texto en español (con fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Para Hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas en Blogger): El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - Parte 1: Como comenzó el machismo, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2010/12/el-machismo-fue-creado-por-las-mujeres.html

Eso texto en español (sin fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Para Hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas en Wordpress): El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - Parte 1: Como comenzó el machismo, http://avezdoshomens2.wordpress.com/2010/12/02/el-machismo-fue-creado-por-las-mujeres-parte-1/

This text in English (with sex pics and movies, at A Vez das Mulheres at Thumblogger): Machismo was created by women - Part 1: How started machismo, http://avezdasmulheres.thumblogger.com/home/log/2010/48/machismo-was-created-by-wo.html

Texto original em português (com fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam): O machismo foi criado pelas mulheres - parte 1: como o machismo comecou, http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2010/11/o-machismo-foi-criado-pelas-mulheres.html

Texto original em português (sem fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade): O machismo foi criado pelas mulheres - parte 1: como o machismo comecou, http://avezdasmulheres.wordpress.com/2010/11/29/o-machismo-foi-criado-pelas-mulheres-parte-1/

Abigail Pereira Aranha

I already wrote "Machismo is not a masculine dictatorship", at A Vez das Mulheres at Thumblogger; "Homem machista, a marionete feminazista" (macho man, the feminazi puppet), at A Vez dos Homens que Prestam; "Para os homens que descem o pau na vadia e admiram a mulher 'decente'" (for the men who condemns the bitch and admires the "decent" woman), at A Vez dos Homens que Prestam; e "Para os homens que descem o pau na vadia e admiram a mulher 'decente' – II", at A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade. Now, I'll write a series of texts to prove, at times with things everybody knows, that machismo was created, developed and nurtured by women today. From what the name suggests, machismo is the dictatorship of men, but is not. Unlike anything you've ever heard, right? So it will be a series, because showing how machismo is more in favor than against women and more beneficial for the women than for the men will be a long conversation. To say things you dont't know or to call your attention to some things. And so I'm not talking only to men who are now knowing the A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade or the A Vez dos Homens que Prestam and that never read a masculinist text, like from the Brazilian Central Masculinista. I'm speaking even for who writes against feminist / feminazism and female scoundrel for some years. Folks, to give an idea of how sexism is nasty, Part 2 will be only with excerpts from the A Vez das Mulheres showing ideas that I had while writing against machismo.

You feel male for being macho? Will get a text saying about that too.

The staff of Maçãs Podres (Bad Apples) dropped this in the text "O Machismo feminino" (the female machismo): "Swearing a woman sexist is to disqualify both feminists and women as a whole." The text is the same usual lesbian feminazist pseudo-intellectual chat. What I will show here is that say that women are macho is closer to the truth, and that will explain a lot, including why women access more blogs about glaze than some Maçãs Podres.

A historian named Martin Van Creveld wrote a book titled "The Privileged Sex" and here's a sneak peek of the beginning of the book:

Almost all the authors give the oppression of women for granted and are contented to explain the details, piling terrible examples and competing within themselves to show how the patriarch is widespread. Just some question when and how he was born, and, what is even more remarkable, how he managed to perpetuate from the very beginnings to the present day.

(...) So far, despite the attempts to establish a connection between this change and the called "Revolution of the Mesolithic," nobody has been able to explain how the matriarchy, in the assumption that it has existed, was deposed as how the patriarchate was established, much less witnessed the happening.

(...) After months of work, were so many questions and contradictions that my mental equilibrium began to be seriously affected; at this point, my wife advised me to take a walk. Scarcely I reached the street when I realized I had been asking the wrong questions; that all problems would disappear if I was ready to admit that my assumptions were wrong. The hypothesis that women are not oppressed would explain why never was produced a convincing explanation of the origins and perpetuation of their oppression. The hypothesis that women are, indeed, the privileged sex would explain why most of them seem more or less satisfied with their condition, and why more women do not have to leave the cosmetics, burning bras, to wear overalls and engage in male jobs such as picking up trash.

Who do not know the book, we didn't find it in English. In Portuguese it is at RapidShare: http://rapidshare.com/#!download|89|59170754|Fragilidade_Feminina.rar|48741.

For those who believe in evolution and the ape-man (I am atheist but I don't believe), imagine the primitive society. Males hunting and taking care of the hard work and females caring for children. Then the men turn the matriarchal society in patriarchal, exploiting women, controlling their exit from house and everything more. And they do it without stop doing the heavy work to support the family and make the society life happen.

Then comes something almost everyone has not realized: how a society can be macho, or a patriarchy, if children are educated by their mothers, often while their fathers are out? I repeat a question that nobody went in the A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade to answer:

Why black slaves raised children who made quilombos and preserved African traditions, the Jews of the time of the Inquisition raised children who risked their lives practicing Judaism and women oppressed by machismo create a generation of macho men and sissies sexually repressed after another?

Going on, the mothers raised their children from when the man was not even quite a man. It doesn't make more sense they raise children that will make a world in which they will be valued, and not discriminated, exploited, suppressed? Returning to the monkey man. Males chose the more physically attractive females and the females chose the stronger, braver, better hunters males. If you believe in evolution, what do you imagine a female could do to perpetuate her genes even though she was a slapper?

How about a society where first the sex is a dirty word - literally? How about a society where one man will only have the chance to have sex with one only woman for his entire life? Where a woman might die if have sex with a stable partner of another woman? You thought of the women muredered for adultery thinking that is man's violence against women? I'll talk about it in another text. How about a society where this relationship has not just sex, but the obligation to support his wife? And what if this relationship is indissoluble, or at least a disgrace to undo?

You are correct that I did not take it from any archaeological research, but you will agree that at least makes sense. And if I am right, there is not how to prove.

In the macho society, a woman may be stupid, illiterate, mediocre, coward, lazy, arrogant, unloved, without character, nasty and very ugly and still have a husband. In the macho society, a mediocre woman and with other defects can have a good marriage only because has beauty or a good body, or have a bunch of wimps to her feet only because her physical. In the macho society, a man can not feel a man without catching or talk he catches at least a bitch guitar body, while any nimpho with a Philosophy degree find herself very good to have any husband. The macho society is a society where all women gain and all good men lose. And that is what I will show.

The serie "Machismo was created by women" in English