mercredi 29 décembre 2010
mardi 28 décembre 2010
Machismo was created by women - part 3: is your model of woman your mother?
Eso texto en español (con fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Para Hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas en Blogger): El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - parte 3: tu modelo de mujer es tu madre? Eso texto en español (sin fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Para Hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas en Wordpress): El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - parte 3: tu modelo de mujer es tu madre? This text in English (with sex pics and movies, at A Vez das Mulheres at Thumblogger): Machismo was created by women - part 3: is your model of woman your mother? Texto original em português (com fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam): O machismo foi criado pelas mulheres – parte 3: o seu modelo de mulher é a sua mãe? Texto original em português (sem fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade): O machismo foi criado pelas mulheres – parte 3: o seu modelo de mulher é a sua mãe?
In what your mother is unlike any woman with low education, alienated, unwise, unsuccessful, unpleasant, sexually repressed and unresolved, and perhaps that is or ever was beautiful, but most likely is a slapper? Have you found this question hard? So keep reading. And don't come with that "slapper is your mother" because I love my mom but I know that she is really ugly, hehehehe.
If in matters of sex feminists say the woman learns to feel guilty, men learn to be inconsistent and hypocritical, besides some stupids in this question. I'll explain.
Wish you see the woman turn the woman of yesteryear? That ugly of face and body, with nothing profitable to talk to (other than children, housework or rural work), sometimes illiterate, who thought that the biggest ethical quality of a woman was to avoid talking to men? And why yesteryear the woman who embellish herself was seen as not being well-behaved? Because the women were a bunch of slappers. And probably one of the slappers was your mother or your grandmother. Why yesteryear was not (considered) right a couple to exchange cuddling in public? Why, because the rule of marriage was two unhappies supporting one another, and here come those two showing signs of happiness?
Do you hate pornography? Very good for them: you are ready to accept a mediocre sexual life. And what a coincidence: almost all women hate sex - including your mother. You hate the little bitches that when are teens are fucking with every good-for-nothing but snub the good guy? You hate that those little bitches end up marrying the good guys after her bodies are already detonated and they already have children of failed relationships to raise? I am also outraged. But if the bitch is a trash, the decent woman is another trash. I'll explain why.
You would not want to see the old woman again. The old woman (your grandmother or your mother) did not talk to a man because it's "not right". She did not work out of home because it was not something to a decent woman. She did not go out to the street alone because it was not something to a decent woman. In a situation like this, you will not get near a woman, you will not know how a woman's leg is like.
And then, do you know what will happen? A mediocre mateless devout woman like any other with whom you can marry will be the only woman you can achieve anything. The nice man today, getting horrible sex from only one woman, crumbs from some few and disregard from the rest, is better than the man of the past. And if the today's whore shows clearly that uses her body as a weapon, the "housewife" does the same thing. A young man interested in a "girl of respect" will talk with her parents and her brothers, head down, trying to prove he is not interested in sex, has to prove he has character, has to prove that earns sufficient money to sustain the girl, has to spent months or years dating with the old, fat and grumpy man which is the girl's father overseeing, has to make some goodies for family and will not have sex until marriage. That's when the boy meets the girl before the wedding day (people, feminists do not say that once women sometimes did not know her husband before the wedding day? Well, the reverse is true). All of this in order to this man can marry the only one woman that he will touch the lifetime. Not much humiliation for a man in a society dominated by men?
Is this woman who uses your sexuality against you what you want to see back? This woman who at best is a bad in sex beautiful woman who thinks the best she has in matter of character and the content is an intact hymen on the wedding night? And at worst is an ugly illiterate and alienated bad in sex woman that her father is pushing at you like a commodity at the end of validity? Will you defend the return of the stoning of adulterers and prostitutes in the name of morality and good manners? The women will love it, but how about you, will you fuck only with your bad in bed slapper wife?
To shred of any doubt: you've read "Instructions and advice for the young bride", written by Ruth Smythers in 1894? (first comes the translation in Portuguese, after the original)
Thinking that the woman should be like in the 40's or 50's is idolizing the mediocre women. And who has the one's finger on it, your mother or your father? It is a mistake that many men that woke up to women rascalities make because they did not stop to think what I said here. Yes, machismo is very sneaky.
The serie "Machismo was created by women" in English
Related Words: machismo, feminism, macho society, oppression of women, patriarchy, honored women, decent woman, promiscuous women, bitches, women of old, women of yesteryears, modern woman, prejudice, macho country, single mother, exemplary mother |
lundi 27 décembre 2010
Machismo was created by women - Part 2: How Abigail was wrong about machismo while writing against it
dimanche 12 décembre 2010
Las mujeres brasileñas son feas
Brazilian women are ugly
Eso texto en español (sin fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Para Hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas en Wordpress): Las mujeres brasileñas son feas, http://avezdoshomens2.wordpress.com/2010/12/12/las-mujeres-brasilenas-son-feas/ This text in English (with sex pics and movies, at A Vez das Mulheres at Thumblogger): Brazilian women are ugly, http://avezdasmulheres.thumblogger.com/home/log/2010/50/brazilian-women-are-ugly.html Texto original em português (com fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam): Nossas mulheres são feias, http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2010/12/nossas-mulheres-sao-feias.html Texto original em português (sem fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade): Nossas mulheres são feias, http://avezdasmulheres.wordpress.com/2010/11/23/nossas-mulheres-sao-feias/
Related words: brazilian woman, self-esteem, charm, sensuality, easy sex |
jeudi 2 décembre 2010
Machismo was created by women - Part 1: How started machismo
Eso texto en español (con fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Para Hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas en Blogger): El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - Parte 1: Como comenzó el machismo, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2010/12/el-machismo-fue-creado-por-las-mujeres.html Eso texto en español (sin fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Para Hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas en Wordpress): El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - Parte 1: Como comenzó el machismo, http://avezdoshomens2.wordpress.com/2010/12/02/el-machismo-fue-creado-por-las-mujeres-parte-1/ This text in English (with sex pics and movies, at A Vez das Mulheres at Thumblogger): Machismo was created by women - Part 1: How started machismo, http://avezdasmulheres.thumblogger.com/home/log/2010/48/machismo-was-created-by-wo.html Texto original em português (com fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam): O machismo foi criado pelas mulheres - parte 1: como o machismo comecou, http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2010/11/o-machismo-foi-criado-pelas-mulheres.html Texto original em português (sem fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade): O machismo foi criado pelas mulheres - parte 1: como o machismo comecou, http://avezdasmulheres.wordpress.com/2010/11/29/o-machismo-foi-criado-pelas-mulheres-parte-1/
I already wrote "Machismo is not a masculine dictatorship", at A Vez das Mulheres at Thumblogger; "Homem machista, a marionete feminazista" (macho man, the feminazi puppet), at A Vez dos Homens que Prestam; "Para os homens que descem o pau na vadia e admiram a mulher 'decente'" (for the men who condemns the bitch and admires the "decent" woman), at A Vez dos Homens que Prestam; e "Para os homens que descem o pau na vadia e admiram a mulher 'decente' – II", at A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade. Now, I'll write a series of texts to prove, at times with things everybody knows, that machismo was created, developed and nurtured by women today. From what the name suggests, machismo is the dictatorship of men, but is not. Unlike anything you've ever heard, right? So it will be a series, because showing how machismo is more in favor than against women and more beneficial for the women than for the men will be a long conversation. To say things you dont't know or to call your attention to some things. And so I'm not talking only to men who are now knowing the A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade or the A Vez dos Homens que Prestam and that never read a masculinist text, like from the Brazilian Central Masculinista. I'm speaking even for who writes against feminist / feminazism and female scoundrel for some years. Folks, to give an idea of how sexism is nasty, Part 2 will be only with excerpts from the A Vez das Mulheres showing ideas that I had while writing against machismo.
You feel male for being macho? Will get a text saying about that too.
The staff of Maçãs Podres (Bad Apples) dropped this in the text "O Machismo feminino" (the female machismo): "Swearing a woman sexist is to disqualify both feminists and women as a whole." The text is the same usual lesbian feminazist pseudo-intellectual chat. What I will show here is that say that women are macho is closer to the truth, and that will explain a lot, including why women access more blogs about glaze than some Maçãs Podres.
A historian named Martin Van Creveld wrote a book titled "The Privileged Sex" and here's a sneak peek of the beginning of the book:
Almost all the authors give the oppression of women for granted and are contented to explain the details, piling terrible examples and competing within themselves to show how the patriarch is widespread. Just some question when and how he was born, and, what is even more remarkable, how he managed to perpetuate from the very beginnings to the present day.
(...) So far, despite the attempts to establish a connection between this change and the called "Revolution of the Mesolithic," nobody has been able to explain how the matriarchy, in the assumption that it has existed, was deposed as how the patriarchate was established, much less witnessed the happening.
(...) After months of work, were so many questions and contradictions that my mental equilibrium began to be seriously affected; at this point, my wife advised me to take a walk. Scarcely I reached the street when I realized I had been asking the wrong questions; that all problems would disappear if I was ready to admit that my assumptions were wrong. The hypothesis that women are not oppressed would explain why never was produced a convincing explanation of the origins and perpetuation of their oppression. The hypothesis that women are, indeed, the privileged sex would explain why most of them seem more or less satisfied with their condition, and why more women do not have to leave the cosmetics, burning bras, to wear overalls and engage in male jobs such as picking up trash.
Who do not know the book, we didn't find it in English. In Portuguese it is at RapidShare: http://rapidshare.com/#!download|89|59170754|Fragilidade_Feminina.rar|48741.
For those who believe in evolution and the ape-man (I am atheist but I don't believe), imagine the primitive society. Males hunting and taking care of the hard work and females caring for children. Then the men turn the matriarchal society in patriarchal, exploiting women, controlling their exit from house and everything more. And they do it without stop doing the heavy work to support the family and make the society life happen.
Then comes something almost everyone has not realized: how a society can be macho, or a patriarchy, if children are educated by their mothers, often while their fathers are out? I repeat a question that nobody went in the A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade to answer:
Why black slaves raised children who made quilombos and preserved African traditions, the Jews of the time of the Inquisition raised children who risked their lives practicing Judaism and women oppressed by machismo create a generation of macho men and sissies sexually repressed after another?
Going on, the mothers raised their children from when the man was not even quite a man. It doesn't make more sense they raise children that will make a world in which they will be valued, and not discriminated, exploited, suppressed? Returning to the monkey man. Males chose the more physically attractive females and the females chose the stronger, braver, better hunters males. If you believe in evolution, what do you imagine a female could do to perpetuate her genes even though she was a slapper?
How about a society where first the sex is a dirty word - literally? How about a society where one man will only have the chance to have sex with one only woman for his entire life? Where a woman might die if have sex with a stable partner of another woman? You thought of the women muredered for adultery thinking that is man's violence against women? I'll talk about it in another text. How about a society where this relationship has not just sex, but the obligation to support his wife? And what if this relationship is indissoluble, or at least a disgrace to undo?
You are correct that I did not take it from any archaeological research, but you will agree that at least makes sense. And if I am right, there is not how to prove.
In the macho society, a woman may be stupid, illiterate, mediocre, coward, lazy, arrogant, unloved, without character, nasty and very ugly and still have a husband. In the macho society, a mediocre woman and with other defects can have a good marriage only because has beauty or a good body, or have a bunch of wimps to her feet only because her physical. In the macho society, a man can not feel a man without catching or talk he catches at least a bitch guitar body, while any nimpho with a Philosophy degree find herself very good to have any husband. The macho society is a society where all women gain and all good men lose. And that is what I will show.
mercredi 1 décembre 2010
El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - Parte 1: Como comenzó el machismo
Eso texto en español (sin fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Para Hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas en Wordpress): El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - Parte 1: Como comenzó el machismo, http://avezdoshomens2.wordpress.com/2010/12/02/el-machismo-fue-creado-por-las-mujeres-parte-1/ This text in English (with sex pics and movies, at A Vez das Mulheres at Thumblogger): Machismo was created by women - Part 1: How started machismo, http://avezdasmulheres.thumblogger.com/home/log/2010/48/machismo-was-created-by-wo.html This text in English (without sex pics and movies, at Paraíso Concreto): Machismo was created by women - Part 1: How started machismo, http://paraisoconcreto.blogspot.com/2010/12/machismo-was-created-by-women-part-1.html Texto original em português (com fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam): O machismo foi criado pelas mulheres - parte 1: como o machismo comecou, http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2010/11/o-machismo-foi-criado-pelas-mulheres.html Texto original em português (sem fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade): O machismo foi criado pelas mulheres - parte 1: como o machismo comecou, http://avezdasmulheres.wordpress.com/2010/11/29/o-machismo-foi-criado-pelas-mulheres-parte-1/
Ya escribió "El machismo no es una dictadura masculina", en Para hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas; "Homem machista, a marionete feminazista" (hombre machista, la marioneta feminazista), en A Vez dos Homens que Prestam, "Para os homens que descem o pau na vadia e admiram a mulher 'decente'" (para los hombres que condenan a la perra y admiran la mujer "decente"), en A Vez dos Homens que Prestam ; e "Para os homens que descem o pau na vadia e admiram a mulher 'decente' - II", en A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade . Ahora, voy a escribir una serie de textos para probar, a veces con las cosas todo el mundo sabe, que el machismo fue creado, desarrollado y nutrido hasta hoy por las mujeres. Por lo que el nombre sugiere, el machismo es la dictadura de los hombres, pero no lo es. Diferente de todo que hayas escuchado alguna vez, ¿verdad? Por eso que será una serie, porque mostrar cómo el machismo es más a favor que contra las mujeres y más beneficioso para las mujeres que para los hombres será una larga conversación. Para decir cosas que usted no sabe o para llamar su atención sobre algunas cosas. Y no estoy hablando sólo a los hombres que están conociendo ahora lo Para hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas y que nunca leyó un texto masculinista, como de la brasileña Central Masculinista. Estoy hablando incluso a quien escribe contra feminismo / feminazismo y las canallices femeninas desde hace algunos años. Amigos, para dar una idea de cómo el machismo es sordido, la Parte 2 será sólo con extractos de lo A Vez das Mulheres mostrando las ideas que yo tenía mientras escribia contra el machismo.
Te sientes hombre por ser machista? Teneremos un texto sobre eso también.
El personal de Maçãs Podres dijo esta en el texto "O machismo feminino": "Llamar una mujer de machista es descalificar tanto las feministas cuanto las mujeres en su conjunto." El texto es la misma que conversación lesbiana feminazista seudo-intelectual de siempre. Qué voy a mostrar aquí es que decir que las mujeres son machistas se acerca más a la verdad, y que explicará mucho, incluyendo por qué las mujeres accesan más blogs sobre esmalte que alguno Maçãs Podres.
Un historiador llamado Martin Van Creveld escribió un libro titulado "El Sexo privilegiado" y esto es un adelanto del comienzo del libro:
Casi todos los autores dan la opresión de las mujeres por sentado y se contentan con explicar los detalles, acumulando ejemplos terribles y competindo entre sí mismos para demostrar cómo el patriarcado está muy extendido. Sólo algunos se preguntan cuándo y cómo él nació; y, lo que es aún más notable, cómo se las arregló para perpetuar desde los inicios hasta la actualidad.
(...) Hasta el momento, a pesar de los intentos de establecer una conexión entre este cambio y la llamada "Revolución del Mesolítico", nadie fue capaz de explicar cómo el matriarcado, en el supuesto de que haya existido, fue depuesto e cómo el patriarcado se estableció, y mucho menos atestigó la ocurrencia.
(...) Después de meses de trabajo, fueron tantas las preguntas y contradicciones que mi equilibrio mental comenzó a verse seriamente afectado, en ese momento, mi esposa me aconsejó dar una caminada. Apenas llegué a la calle cuando me di cuenta de que había estado haciendo las preguntas equivocadas, que todos los problemas desaparecerían si yo estaba dispuesto a admitir que mis suposiciones eran erróneas. La hipótesis de que las mujeres no seren oprimidas explicaría por qué nunca se produjo una explicación convincente de los orígenes y la perpetuación de la opresión. La hipótesis de que las mujeres son, de hecho, el sexo privilegiado explicaría por qué la mayoría de ellas parecen más o menos satisfechas con su estado, y por qué más mujeres passaron a no abandonar los cosméticos, a quemar soutiens, a usar ropa de trabajo y participar en puestos de trabajo masculinos, como recoger la basura.
Quien no conoce el libro, no lo encontramos en español. En portugués está en RapidShare: http://rapidshare.com/#!download|89|59170754|Fragilidade_Feminina.rar|48741.
Para aquellos que creen en la Evolución y el hombre mono (yo soy atea, pero no creo), imagine la sociedad primitiva. Los hombres cazando y cuidando del trabajo duro y las mujeres en el cuidado de niños. Entonces los hombres tornan la sociedad de matriarcal en patriarcal, expoliando las mujeres, controlando su salida de la casa y todo lo más. Y lo hacen sin dejar de hacer el trabajo pesado para sostener a la familia y hacer la vida de la sociedad suceder.
Luego viene algo que casi todo el mundo no se ha dado cuenta: ¿cómo una sociedad puede ser machista, o un patriarcado, si los niños son educados por sus madres, a menudo mientras sus padres están fuera? Repito una pregunta que nadie fue en la A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade para responder:
¿Por qué los esclavos negros creaban niños que hacian "quilombos" y conservaban las tradiciones africanas, los judios de la época de la Inquisición creaban niños que arriesgaron sus vidas practicando el judaísmo y las mujeres oprimidas por el machismo crean una generación de hombres machistas y mujerzitas sexualmente reprimidas detrás otra?
Continuando, las madres criaban a sus hijos desde que el hombre ni siquiera era buen un hombre. No tiene más sentido ellas criaren niños que harán un mundo en que ellas serán valoradas, y no discriminadas, expoliadas, suprimidas? Volviendo al hombre mono. Los hombres eligian las mujeres más físicamente atractivas y las mujeres eligian los hombres más fuertes, más valientes, mejores cazadores. Si usted cree en la evolución, lo que imaginas que una mujer podría hacer para perpetuar sus genes a pesar de que era una feosa?
¿Qué tal una sociedad en que el sexo es una mala palabra - literalmente? ¿Qué tal una sociedad en la que un hombre sólo tendrá la oportunidad de tener relaciones sexuales con una única mujer, durante toda su vida? ¿Donde una mujer puede morir si tener relaciones sexuales con un parejo estable de otra mujer? ¿Pensaste en las mujeres asesinadas por adulterio pensando que es violencia del hombre contra la mujer? Voy a hablar de eso en otro texto. ¿Qué tal una sociedad en la que esta relación no tiene sólo sexo, pero la obligación de mantener la esposa? ¿Y qué tal se esta relación es indisoluble, o por lo menos una desgracia para deshacer?
Tiene razón en que yo no tiré eso de cualquier investigación arqueológica, pero usted estará de acuerdo en que al menos tiene sentido. Y si estoy en lo correcto, no hay como probar.
En la sociedad machista, una mujer puede ser estúpida, analfabeta, mediocre, cobarde, perezosa, arrogante, sin amor, sin carácter, desagradable y muy fea y aún así tener un marido. En la sociedad machista, una mujer mediocre y con otros defectos puede tener un buen matrimonio sólo porque tiene una belleza o un buen cuerpo, o tener un montón de tontos a sus pies sólo por su físico. En la sociedad machista, un hombre no consigue sentirse un hombre sin coger o hablar que coger con por lo menos una perra cuerpo guitarra, mientras que cualquier ninfeta con un grado de Filosofía piensa a sí misma muy buena para tener algún marido. La sociedad machista es una sociedad donde todas las mujeres ganan y todos los hombres buenos pierden. Y eso es lo que voy a mostrar.