An upcoming anti-porn revenge?

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Tiziana Cantone's case, according to mainstream media itself, was as follows: a slut tried to mock her ex-boyfriend through sending a sex vídeo of her with her new boyfriend to him and some female friends; he did nothing further than share the video with her identification; she was publicly recognized as a slut and no longer could have a normal fake moralistic life; so, she committed suicide. This may have been the first case of gender justice in the world history. She was left alone with what she did, how it is seen by society and what it can bring as consequence. If the ex-boyfriend got depressed and he committed suicide, I would not know about it through an article in Brazilian news portal G1. If he committed violence against this woman, he would be depicted in the news as the sole condemnable part. Furthermore, if she said he raped her in Twitter, he would be today dead by lynching, imprisoned or trying to recover his professional life. Thus, the worst thing Tiziana's ex-boyfriend did was not trying to make justice by his own means, it was ACHIEVING justice by his own means. Therefore, not only outside the Judiciary, it was against it.

Even a Slut Walk participant in all her inability to manage external standards confrontation would have a life and a death with more decency. She could say some accurate words about fake moralism, sexual repression or the benefits of sex. If Tiziana did not believe "uninhibited and playful sex is still the worst of sins", as Roberto Saviano said their compatriots believe, she would not have killed herself, first and foremost. That's what makes this uproar more stupid: she did not die BECAUSE OF sexual repression, she died IN DEFENSE of it.

Meanwhile, these news popped on international press:

1) Pornhub was censored in Russia. The censor said to a citizen on Twitter to "meet someone in real life". As if it was not enough, a certain lesbian cow called Grace Dent wrote in The Independent "No wonder millennials are angry Russia's banned Pornhub – this generation thinks the world owes them an orgasm" (The Independent, September 16, 2016, http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/pornhub-youporn-russia-ban-millennials-porn-angry-sex-masturbation-generation-owes-them-orgasm-a7311266.html). The authoress was stupid enough to provide argument against herself: "my generation were accused throughout our youth of thinking 'the world owed us a living'". In the comments, she is being fairly replied. But what caught my attention is that a Russian anti-porn censorship is being praised in a West major newspaper and the columnist prefers to address mockery to the discontents. Male discontents, more exactly. And United Kingdom, where she is, has blocked pornography nationwide and has some disgusting lesbian feminists in its mainstream media.

2) "Japan has a worrying number of virgins, government finds" (The Independent, September 17, 2016, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/japan-has-a-worrying-number-of-virgins-government-finds-a7312961.html). "According to the Japan Times, a new survey of Japanese people ages 18 to 34 found that 70 percent of unmarried men and 60 percent of unmarried women are not in a relationship. It gets worse: Around 42 percent of men and 44.2 percent of women admitted that they were virgins." And we know that if a 21-years-old woman says she's virgin, it's somewhat dubious, but if a 21-years-old man says he's virgin, surely he is virgin. What explains it? Feminism. For us to have a notion, "Japanese company offers insurance plan to protect against false train groping accusations" (Rocket News 24, November 12, 2015, http://en.rocketnews24.com/2015/11/12/japanese-company-offers-insurance-plan-to-protect-against-false-train-groping-accusations).

I had not found something about it, but we can expect in these next months some government actions in Japan against those hyper-realistic sex dolls, prostitution and pornography. In all those countries, these news may confirm an upcoming anti-porn and anti-male campaign. Why am I putting pornography here (in the discussion)? And why do I link censorship against pornography to attacks against men? I am neither a sex-addicted and nor a sex professional, I am just a lover, hehehehe. Pornography was crafted for men, and it was the most accessed material in the internet for more than a decade until Orkut and Facebook surpassed it late 2000s. Feminist porn is not taken seriously even within the militancy itself. Heterosexual pornography will always have overwhelmingly male costumers, and porn industry will always focus in men and what pleases them. And nowadays, to say that something is oriented to please men is to say it must be changed or annihilated. Incidentally, when it came the information that a slight majority of gamer community was girls, international press celebrated it.

To say to a man what he must be or do based in the interest of his community, in the well-being of his family or in what pleases women is like talking about fox nutrition in the poulterer. But we have increasingly more men in these and other countries perceiving it. These men are not giving up society because they discovered Men's Rights Activism. They are perceiving a social environment in whose not only they have lack of sex and their contact with women increasingly turning into police matter, not only they have increasingly more women saying and showing they don't need them, only having a closest contact with them to increasingly demand more and offer less; these men perceive that the sole reason to fulfill their social tasks is that the others say it's their duty, while their depression or suicide does not seem to matter and whatever feminist annoyance does.

To say to a man what he must be or do based in the interest of his community, in the well-being of his family or in what pleases unpleasant women is like talking about fox nutrition in the poultry house. But we have increasingly more men in these and other countries perceiving it. These men are not giving up on society because they discovered Men's Rights Activism.They are perceiving a social environment in which not only they have lack of sex and their contact with women increasingly turning into police matter, not only they have increasingly more women saying and showing they don't need them, only having a closest contact with them for increasingly to demand more and to offer less; these men perceive that the sole reason to fulfill their social tasks is that the others say it's their duty, while their depression or suicide does not seem to matter but any feminist blather does.

Ah, in Japan, 2007, the health minister Hakuo Yanagisawa said to women, about the population decrease, that "the number of child-bearing machines and devices is fixed, all we can ask for is for them to do their best per head, although it may not be so appropriate to call them machines". He had to apologize under warnings by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe ("Yanagisawa sexist remark draws Abe ire", Japan Times, January 30, 2007, http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2007/01/30/national/yanagisawa-sexist-remark-draws-abe-ire). 2011, when were a mass of men who were not interested in sex, the "herbivores", Amy Chavez dedicated an article in Japan Times to disdain them and preaching what they must to do to be interesting ("Herbivorous men, where’s the beef?", Japan Times, December 17, 2011, http://www.japantimes.co.jp/community/2011/12/17/our-lives/herbivorous-men-wheres-the-beef).

If we see Feminism-Socialism leads countries under risk of population collapse because false reports of sexual crimes have led men to become uninterested in sex, or it leads a government to attract notorious animosity from its own citizens; WE WILL NOT SEE this mess in a turning point. A changing in mentality and deeds, after a great sense of shame, when vulgar mistakes are public and notorious is expected in people with normal minds. Since Feminism is lesbian insanity and Socialism is the political system to take advantage of collective stupidity, bizarre errors becoming public can still lead to plus errors. Because leftism is a war for mediocrity, thus someone who represents a victory of nobility or knowledge or, at least, a better life quality against the collective mediocrity is an enemy to be won, not someone who brings an opportunity to self-criticism and improvement.

That's what explains The Independent to make puerile mockeries about Russians against Russian internet censorship, or Italian government trying to support Tiziana Cantone for her to have a new identity to her to evade her past as if she was just another puritan woman since childhood, not a notorious slut. Those news can mark an open hunting season to men who react to a society which has women who are prodigal in saying them what to be and what to do, but literally do not give a fuck in exchange.