Why do leftist Christians and capitalists exist?

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Do not feel offended when I say that understanding why leftist Christians and capitalists exist is not difficult if you are not a conservative Christian or a libertarian. I will explain.

The libertarian believes that capitalists can do as much good to the public interest as they do for the bank accounts of their enterprises if they can have as much freedom in and on society as within their enterprises. The Christian believes that Christianism can transform the world into a draft of Paradise if it is known and followed by all mankind. Just as the Christian believes in Christianism itself and in the Christian fidelity of the clergy at least in his / her section of Christianity, the libertarian believes in Capitalism and in the fidelity of the capitalists to Capitalism. That's where they go wrong.

The libertarian believes that the developed capitalist countries are developed because they have adopted Capitalism and the big capitalists have benefited the community as a whole, these great capitalists have become what they are through selling products that satisfy and are valuable to their customers, they have outperformed their competitors through making the best products and services at the best prices. The conservative Christian believes that Christianism exists today because a dozen commoners from Judea faced the Roman Empire almost 2000 years ago. They both look at the doctrine and forget about politics.

The version itself that the Christian church began with a popular movement in a peripheral province of the Roman Empire in the year 33, and not in the very empire's headquarters almost 300 years later, is part of that same political action. And the greater was the political-social power of traditional Christian churches, the more widespread, more suffocating, and less subject to questioning was "Christian morality", especially in the sexual area. This has produced from a mass production of hypocrites, dual life depraveds and neurotics to collective escapes like Carnival. Beyond an epidemic of stupidity and illiteracy that included burning books and executing and lynching of people for heresy or less repressed sexuality. By the way, "paganism" comes from "paganus", peasant in Latin: the peasants resisted as long as they could to the conversion forced by the Roman Empire.[1] If today some conservatives can only respond to my ideas by blocking me on social networks, at that epoch it would be just send a troop of women to arrest me and burn me covered in a public square (because if a man sees one of the fingers of Abigail's hands, he'll receive her spirit of atheism and prostitution). There is no country with more than 80% of Christians today that neither has been a Christian since the beginning of Christianism nor was colonized by someone that was. In any other, the Christian churches are numerically insignificant and usually clandestine. Today, traditional churches in the countries whose huge majority is nominally Christian lose more and more political power, social influence, characterization and, not infrequently, number of members.

Libertarianism and Ultralibertarianism (known as "Anarcho-capitalism" or "Libertarian Anarchism") have already started wrong in the concept: I am a capitalist, the State lets me do what I want or it exists and has power only to do what I decide it to do. The Communist Manifesto already told us that when the anticommunist capitalist speaks of freedom and democracy, the freedom is for Capitalism and the people of democracy are the bourgeoisie itself. Karl Marx was right. Just as the socialist State is only antireligious because it wants to be the religion itself, the libertarian and the ultralibertarian are only antistatists because they want to be the State themselves.

Another mistake of conservative Christians and libertarians is thinking that leftist ideology is a pure antithesis of their ideas, everything that the Christian and the libertarian say "no", the left says "yes". If there are left-wing capitalists, left-wing Christians or even Christian feminists[2], this is because some possible intersection between the two parts exists. One intersection of conservative Christianism with the left-wing that I know of is militancy against sex: one side puts me in the other and both call me the sexual object of men, that's because they only discovered my profile on Twitter, not with how many men I had the double penetrations and the facials cumshots they saw there.

Even if Socialism is the dictatorship of the proletariat, what would these proletarians do in power? What would be the moral, intellectual, and interpersonal schemas they would bring to the new society? Better: why would be the society really new? But if Socialism comes and dictatorship is not of the proletariat, who will it be of? It is now that you will understand this whole tour I gave.

Who will govern in Socialism will be the socialist movement. And whoever is not in the dictatorship of the proletariat will be in the proletariat of the dictatorship. So, a capitalist can try to earn the grace of the socialist movement to anticipate and, at worst, to survive. With the left-wing Christians, the reasoning is the same. If some religion survives, it's because it has the permission of the socialist movement. There is still a hypothesis that does not involve cronyism but is worrying: left-wing Christians and left-wing capitalists struggle not for a place in the future Soviet elite's "clique", but for the ideals of a better world, they really believe in the beautiful part of discourse of the socialist movement. The thing is worse than a supposed left-wing monopoly of the virtue, it's the lack of decent ideas in the opposite side plus an almost general destruction of the intelligence that manifests itself in the rich class and in the decision-making positions.

The leftism is almost the only political-ideological stream that manifests itself in the churches and in the business world because of another problem that libertarians and conservatives only paid attention to it after seeing the left-wing come to power (not only in formal politics): thinking that defending an ideological, political or moral position is something to those who do not have to fulfill work expedient or who have a salary to make this. When they did not think about the home-work circuit, the traditional Christian only thought about sex (in attacking sex or any closer man-woman contact) and the traditional capitalist only thought about profit. Or so they were seen. Those who were handsome in speech and practice were the leftist Christian and the leftist capitalist. Politics only ceased to be treated by the Christian churches as impious and by the business class as baloney when they campaigned politically for the left-wing or when a leftist government shook off what they thought was the most important.

Both among Christians and among libertarians, the "pure" do not come to power, at least as a rule. Even in the Old Testament of the Bible this happened when Israel left the time of the judges to the time of the kings. Then, up to the captivity in Babylon, the Twelve Tribes had prophets who were faithful to the Word of God both with righteous kings and with careless or wicked kings. In the case of the libertarians, what hinders them is the fantasy plus the moneyism plus the stupidity. If we look at any libertarian website or the work of any libertarian writer or columnist, there is no one proposal or analysis that is not, at best, a dogmatic interpretation of biased cuts with a casual hit. Hence, even the Libertarian Party of the United States[3] is irrelevant.

I was organizing these words in my head when I saw a news shared on social networks: Workers' Party president, Gleisi "Lula" Hoffmann, recorded a video next to a pastor in an invitation to the 1st Meeting of Male Evangelicals and Female Evangelicals in the Workers' Party[4]. The people who shared the video, scandalized, are the same ones who say that traditional Christianism overcomes the world for 2000 years and that Socialism does not work. Some of these people were the same people who said or shared to young people, 10 or 20 years ago, that Rede Globo was Satanist, that pornography made men become rapists and pedophiles, that the condom had micro-holes through which the AIDS virus passed, and things in this level. Even a demoralized left-wing whose biggest party has lost the presidential election six months ago can still intellectually overcome such type of conservative Christians, even within their own church.

Without entering into the question of the myths that conservative Christians and libertarians have about the origins and solidity of the ideas in which they believe, their surprise with left-wing Christians and left-wing capitalists comes from unpreparedness for sociopolitical action, especially when they are not in power, plus the astonishing ignorance of what the socialist movement is.

NOTES AND REFERENCES:

[1] "Paganismo", Armando Araújo Silvestre, InfoEscola, https://www.infoescola.com/religiao/paganismo.

[2] "Introduction to Christian Feminism", Christian Feminism Today, https://eewc.com/introduction-christian-feminism.

[3] "About the Libertarian Party", Libertarian Party, https://www.lp.org/about.

[4] "'Jesus sempre foi a nossa referência', diz Gleisi Hoffmann", Gospel Prime, April 09, 2019, https://www.gospelprime.com.br/jesus-sempre-foi-a-nossa-referencia-diz-gleisi-hoffmann.

Pourquoi les chrétiens et les capitalistes de gauche existent?

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Ne vous sentez pas offensé quand je dis que comprendre pourquoi les chrétiens et les capitalistes de gauche existent n’est pas difficile si vous n’êtes pas un chrétien conservateur ou libéral. Je vais expliquer.

Les libertaires croient que les capitalistes peuvent faire autant de bien aux intérêts publics qu’aux comptes de banque de leurs entreprises s’ils ont autant de liberté dans et sur la société que dans leurs entreprises. Le chrétien croit que le Christianisme peut transformer le monde en projet de Paradis s'il est connu et suivi par toute l'humanité. Tout comme le chrétien croit au Christianisme lui-même et à la fidélité chrétienne du clergé du moins dans sa partie du Christianisme, le libertaire croit au Capitalisme et à la fidélité des capitalistes au Capitalisme. C'est là qu'ils vont mal.

Le libertarien croit que les pays capitalistes développés sont développés parce qu'ils ont adopté le Capitalisme et que les grands capitalistes ont profité à la communauté dans son ensemble, ces grands capitalistes sont devenus ce qu'ils sont en vendant des produits satisfaisants et précieux pour leurs clients, ils ont surclassé leurs concurrents en fabriquant les meilleurs produits et services aux meilleurs prix. Le chrétien conservateur croit que le Christianisme existe aujourd'hui car une douzaine de roturiers de Judée ont fait face à l'Empire Romain il y a près de 2000 ans. Les deux regardent la doctrine et oublient la politique.

La version elle-même que l'église chrétienne a commencé avec un mouvement populaire dans une province périphérique de l'Empire Romain en l'an 33, et non au siège même de l'empire près de 300 ans plus tard, fait partie de cette même action politique. Et plus le pouvoir politico-social des églises chrétiennes traditionnelles était grand, plus la "moralité chrétienne", en particulier dans le domaine sexuel, était plus répandue, plus suffocante et moins sujette à interrogation. Cela a donné lieu à d'une production massive d’hypocrites, de dépravés à la double vie et de névrosés à des évasions collectives comme Carnival. Au-delà d’une épidémie de stupidité et d’analphabétisme qui comprenait l'autodafé de livres et l’exécution et le lynchage de personnes pour hérésie ou sexualité moins réprimée. A propos, "paganisme" vient de "paganus", paysan en latin: les paysans ont résisté aussi longtemps qu'ils le pouvaient à la conversion forcée par l'Empire Romain.[1] Si aujourd’hui certains conservateurs ne peuvent répondre à mes idées en me bloquant sur les réseaux sociaux, à cette époque, ce serait juste d'envoyer une troupe de femmes pour qu’elle m’arrête et me brûle couverte sur une place publique (car si un homme voit l’un des doigts des mains d’Abigail, il recevra son esprit d’athéisme et de prostitution). Il n'y a pas de pays avec plus de 80% de chrétiens aujourd'hui qui n'ait été chrétien depuis le début du Christianisme ni colonisé par quelqu'un qui ait été. Dans toutes les autres, les églises chrétiennes sont numériquement insignifiantes et généralement clandestines. Aujourd’hui, les églises traditionnelles des pays dont la grande majorité est nominalement chrétienne perdent de plus en plus de pouvoir politique, d’influence sociale, de caractérisation et, souvent, de nombre de membres.

Le Libertarisme et l'Ultralibertarisme (connus sous le nom d '"Anarcho-capitalisme" ou d'"Anarchisme Libertaire") ont déjà commencé mal dans le concept: je suis un capitaliste, l'État me laisse faire ce que je veux ou il existe et n'a le pouvoir que de faire ce que je décide qu'il fasse. Le Manifeste Communiste nous a déjà dit que lorsque le capitaliste anticommuniste parle de liberté et de démocratie, la liberté appartient au Capitalisme et le peuple de la démocratie est la bourgeoisie elle-même. Karl Marx avait raison. Tout comme l’État socialiste n’est antireligieux parce qu’il veut être la religion il-même, le libertaire et le ultralibertaire ne sont anti-étatistes parce qu’ils veulent être l’État eux-mêmes.

Une autre erreur des chrétiens conservateurs et des libertaires est de penser que l’idéologie de gauche est une pure antithèse de leurs idées, de tout ce que le chrétien et le libertaire disent «non», la gauche dit «oui». S'il y a des capitalistes de gauche, des chrétiens de gauche ou même des féministes chrétiennes[2], c'est car existe un certain croisement possible entre les deux parties. Un croisement du Christianisme conservateur avec l'aile gauche que je connais est le militantisme contre le sexe: un côté me met dans l'autre et les deux m'appellent l'objet sexuel des hommes, c'est parce qu'ils n'ont découvert mon profil sur Twitter, pas avec combien hommes j’ai eu les doubles pénétrations et les éjaculations faciales qu’ils ont vues là-bas.

Même si le Socialisme est la dictature du prolétariat, que feraient ces prolétaires au pouvoir? Quels seraient les schémas moraux, intellectuels et interpersonnels qu'ils apporteraient à la nouvelle société? Mieux: pourquoi la société serait-elle vraiment nouvelle? Mais si le Socialisme vient et la dictature n'est pas du prolétariat, de qui sera-t-elle? C'est maintenant que vous allez comprendre toute la tournée que j'ai donnée.

Qui gouvernera dans le Socialisme sera le mouvement socialiste. Et quiconque ne fait pas partie de la dictature du prolétariat sera dans le prolétariat de la dictature. Ainsi, un capitaliste peut essayer de gagner la grâce du mouvement socialiste pour anticiper et, au pire, survivre. Avec les chrétiens de gauche, le raisonnement est le même. Si certain religion survit, c'est parce qu'elle a l'autorisation du mouvement socialiste. Il y a toujours une hypothèse qui n'implique pas le clientélisme mais qui est inquiétante: les chrétiens de gauche et les capitalistes de gauche ne luttent pas pour une place dans la "clique" de la future élite soviétique, mais pour les idéaux d'un monde meilleur, ils croient vraiment en la belle partie du discours du mouvement socialiste. La chose est pire qu’un prétendu monopole de gauche de la vertu, c’est le manque d’idées décentes du côté opposé et en plus une destruction presque générale de l’intelligence qui se manifeste dans la classe riche et dans les postes de décision.

Le gauchisme est presque le seul courant politico-idéologique qui se manifeste dans les églises et dans le monde des affaires en raison d'un autre problème que les libertaires et les conservateurs n'ont prêté qu'à son attention après avoir vu la gauche prendre le pouvoir (pas seulement dans la politique formelle): penser que défendre une position idéologique, politique ou morale convient à ceux qui ne sont pas obligés de faire le travail opportun ou qui ont un salaire pour le faire. Quand ils ne pensaient pas au circuit domicile-travail, le chrétien traditionnel pensait seulement au sexe (en s'attaquant au sexe ou à tout contact étroit homme-femme) et le capitaliste traditionnel pensait seulement au profit. Ou alors ils ont été vus. Ceux qui étaient beaux dans la parole et la pratique étaient le chrétien de gauche et le capitaliste de gauche. La politique n'a cessé d'être traitée par les églises chrétiennes comme impie et par le monde des affaires comme idiotie quand elles faisaient campagne politique pour la gauche ou lorsqu'un gouvernement de gauche a secoué ce qui leur paraissait le plus important.

Tant parmi les chrétiens que parmi les libertaires, les «purs» ne parviennent pas au pouvoir, du moins en règle générale. Même dans l'Ancien Testament de la Bible, cela se produisit quand Israël laissa le temps des juges au temps des rois. Ensuite, jusqu'à la captivité à Babylone, les Douze Tribus avaient des prophètes fidèles à la Parole de Dieu, tant avec des rois justes que avec des rois négligents ou méchants. Dans le cas des libertaires, ce qui les empêche c'est le fantasme plus l'argentisme plus la stupidité. Si nous examinons un site Web libertaire ou le travail d’un écrivain ou éditorialiste libertaire, il n’existe pas de proposition ou d’analyse qui ne soit, au mieux, une interprétation dogmatique de coupes biaisées avec un succès occasionnel. Par conséquent, même le Parti Libertaire des États-Unis[3] n’est pas pertinent.

J'étais en train d'organiser ces mots dans ma tête quand j'ai vu une nouvelle partagée sur les réseaux sociaux: la présidente du Parti des Travailleurs, Gleisi "Lula" Hoffmann, a enregistré une vidéo à côté d'un pasteur dans une invitation à la 1ère Rencontre d'Hommes et Femmes Évangéliques de le Parti des Travailleurs[4]. Les personnes qui ont partagé la vidéo scandalisées sont les mêmes qui disent que le Christianisme traditionnel a vaincu le monde pendant 2000 ans et que le Socialisme ne fonctionne pas. Certaines de ces personnes étaient les mêmes qui avaient dit ou partagé aux jeunes, il y a 10 ou 20 ans, que Rede Globo était sataniste, que la pornographie faisait des hommes devenir violeurs et pédophiles, que le préservatif avait des micro-trous à travers lesquels le virus du sida passait, et les choses à ce niveau. Même une gauche démoralisée, dont le plus grand parti a perdu l'élection présidentielle il y a six mois, peut toujours surmonter intellectuellement ce type de chrétiens conservateurs, même au sein de leur propre église.

Sans entrer dans la question des mythes que les chrétiens conservateurs et les libertaires ont sur les origines et la solidité des idées auxquelles ils croient, leur surprise avec les chrétiens de gauche et les capitalistes de gauche vient du manque de préparation à une action sociopolitique, surtout quand ils ne sont pas au pouvoir, plus l'étonnante ignorance de ce qu'est le mouvement socialiste.

NOTES ET RÉFÉRENCES:

[1] "Paganismo", Armando Araújo Silvestre, InfoEscola, https://www.infoescola.com/religiao/paganismo.

[2] "Introduction to Christian Feminism", Christian Feminism Today, https://eewc.com/introduction-christian-feminism.

[3] "About the Libertarian Party", Libertarian Party, https://www.lp.org/about.

[4] "'Jesus sempre foi a nossa referência', diz Gleisi Hoffmann", Gospel Prime, 09 avril 2019, https://www.gospelprime.com.br/jesus-sempre-foi-a-nossa-referencia-diz-gleisi-hoffmann.

Perché cristiani e capitalisti di sinistra esistono?

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Non ti senti offeso quando dico che comprendere perché cristiani e capitalisti di sinistra esistono non è difficile se non sei un cristiano conservatore o un libertario. Spiegherò.

Il libertario crede che i capitalisti possano fare altrettanto bene all'interesse pubblico come fanno per i conti bancari delle loro imprese se possono avere tanta libertà dentro e sulla società come all'interno delle loro imprese. Il cristiano crede che il Cristianesimo possa trasformare il mondo in una bozza di Paradiso se è conosciuto e seguito da tutta l'umanità. Proprio come il cristiano crede nel Cristianesimo stesso e nella fedeltà cristiana del clero almeno nella sua parte del Cristianesimo, il libertario crede nel Capitalismo e nella fedeltà dei capitalisti al Capitalismo. Ecco dove vanno male.

Il libertario crede che i paesi capitalisti sviluppati siano sviluppati perché hanno adottato il Capitalismo e che i grandi capitalisti hanno avvantaggiato la comunità nel suo complesso, questi grandi capitalisti sono diventati quello che sono vendendo prodotti che soddisfano e sono preziosi per i loro clienti, loro hanno sovraperformato i loro concorrenti attraverso la realizzazione dei migliori prodotti e servizi ai migliori prezzi. Il cristiano conservatore crede che il Cristianesimo esiste oggi perché una dozzina di plebei della Giudea ha affrontato l'Impero Romano quasi 2000 anni fa. Entrambi guardano la dottrina e dimenticano la politica.

La versione stessa che la chiesa cristiana iniziò con un movimento popolare in una provincia periferica dell'Impero Romano nell'anno 33, e non nel quartier generale stesso dell'impero quasi 300 anni dopo, è parte di quella stessa azione politica. E più grande era il potere politico-sociale delle chiese cristiane tradizionali, il più diffusa, più soffocante e meno soggetta a interrogarsi era la "morale cristiana", specialmente nell'area sessuale. Questo ha prodotto da una produzione di massa di ipocriti, depravati di vita duali e nevrotici a fughe collettive come Carnival. Al di là di un'epidemia di stupidità e analfabetismo che includeva rogo di libri e esecuzione e linciaggio di persone per eresia o sessualità meno repressa. A proposito, "paganesimo" deriva da "paganus", contadino in latino: i contadini resistettero finché poterono alla conversione forzata dall'Impero Romano.[1] Se oggi alcuni conservatori possono solo rispondere alle mie idee bloccandomi sui social network, in quell'epoca sarebbe solo mandare una truppa di donne ad arrestarmi e bruciarmi coperta in una piazza pubblica (perché se un uomo vede una delle dita delle mani di Abigail, lui riceverà il suo spirito di ateismo e prostituzione). Non c'è un paese con oltre l'80% di cristiani oggi che non sia stato cristiano dall'inizio del Cristianesimo e non sia stato colonizzato da qualcuno che lo era. In qualsiasi altro, le chiese cristiane sono numericamente insignificanti e di solito clandestine. Oggi, le chiese tradizionali nei paesi la cui grande maggioranza è nominalmente cristiana perdono sempre più potere politico, influenza sociale, caratterizzazione e, non di rado, numero di membri.

Il Libertarismo e l'Ultralibertarismo (noto come "Anarco-capitalismo" o "Anarchismo Libertario") hanno già iniziato a sbagliare nel concetto: io sono un capitalista, lo Stato mi permette di fare ciò che voglio o esiste e ha il potere solo di fare ciò che decido che lui faccia. Il Manifesto Comunista ci ha già detto che quando il capitalista anticomunista parla di libertà e democrazia, la libertà è per il Capitalismo e il popolo della democrazia è la stessa borghesia. Karl Marx aveva ragione. Proprio come lo Stato socialista è solo antireligioso perché vuole essere la religione stessa, il libertario e l'ultralibertario sono solo anti-statisti perché vogliono essere lo Stato stesso.

Un altro errore dei cristiani conservatori e dei libertari è pensare che l'ideologia di sinistra sia una pura antitesi delle loro idee, tutto ciò che il cristiano e il libertario dicono "no", la sinistra dice "sì". Se ci sono i capitalisti di sinistra, i cristiani di sinistra o anche le femministe cristiane[2], questo è perché esiste qualche possibile intersezione tra le due parti. Un'intersezione del Cristianesimo conservatore con la sinistra che conosco è la militanza contro il sesso: un lato mi mette nell'altro ed entrambi mi chiamano l'oggetto sessuale degli uomini, questo perché solo hanno scoperto il mio profilo su Twitter, non con quanti uomini ho avuto le doppie penetrazioni e le sborrate facciali che hanno visto lì.

Anche se il Socialismo è la dittatura del proletariato, cosa farebbero al potere questi proletari? Quali sarebbero gli schemi morali, intellettuali e interpersonali che porteranno alla nuova società? Meglio: perché la società sarebbe davvero nuova? Ma se il Socialismo arriva e la dittatura non è del proletariato, di chi sarà? È ora che capirai tutto questo tour che ho dato.

La sinistra è quasi l'unica corrente politico-ideologica che si manifesta nelle chiese e nel mondo degli affari a causa di un altro problema che i libertari ei conservatori hanno prestato attenzione solo dopo aver visto la sinistra arrivare al potere (non solo nella politica formale): pensare che difendere una posizione ideologica, politica o morale è qualcosa per coloro che non devono soddisfare espedienti di lavoro o che hanno uno stipendio per farlo. Quando non pensavano al circuito casa-lavoro, il cristiano tradizionale pensava solo al sesso (al attaccare il sesso o qualsiasi contatto uomo-donna più vicino) e il capitalista tradizionale pensava solo al profitto. O così sono stati visti. Coloro che erano belli nella parola e nella pratica erano il cristiano di sinistra e il capitalista di sinistra. La politica solo ha cessato di essere trattata dalle chiese cristiane come empie e dalla classe degli affari come sciocchezze quando loro hanno fatto campagna politica per la sinistra o quando un governo di sinistra ha tremato quello che pensavano che fosse il più importante.

Chi governerà nel Socialismo sarà il movimento socialista. E chi non è nella dittatura del proletariato sarà nel proletariato della dittatura. Quindi, un capitalista può cercare di guadagnare la grazia del movimento socialista per anticipare e, nel peggiore dei casi, sopravvivere. Con i cristiani di sinistra, il ragionamento è lo stesso. Se qualche religione sopravvive, è perché ha il permesso del movimento socialista. C'è ancora un'ipotesi che non coinvolge il clientelismo, ma è preoccupante: i cristiani di sinistra e i capitalisti di sinistra non lottano per un posto nella "cricca" della futura élite sovietica, ma per gli ideali di un mondo migliore, loro credono davvero nella bella parte del discorso del movimento socialista. La cosa è peggiore di un supposto monopolio di sinistra della virtù, è la mancanza di idee decenti nella parte opposta più una distruzione quasi generale dell'intelligenza che si manifesta nella classe ricca e nelle posizioni decisionali.

Sia tra i cristiani che tra i libertari, i "puri" non arrivano al potere, almeno di regola. Anche nell'Antico Testamento della Bibbia ciò accadde quando Israele lasciò il tempo dei giudici al tempo dei re. Quindi, fino alla prigionia in Babilonia, le Dodici Tribù avevano profeti che erano fedeli alla Parola di Dio sia con re giusti che con re distratti o malvagi. Nel caso dei libertari, ciò che li ostacola è la fantasia più il denarismo più la stupidità. Se guardiamo un qualsiasi sito web libertario o il lavoro di uno qualsiasi scrittore o editorialista libertario, non esiste una proposta o un'analisi che non sia, nel migliore dei casi, un'interpretazione dogmatica di tagli distorti con un successo casuale. Quindi, anche il Partito Libertario degli Stati Uniti[3] è irrilevante.

Stavo organizzando queste parole nella mia testa quando ho visto una notizia condivisa sui social network: la presidente del Partito dei Lavoratori, Gleisi "Lula" Hoffmann, ha registrato un video accanto a un pastore in un invito al 1º Incontro di Evangelici ed Evangeliche del Partito dei Lavoratori[4]. Le persone che hanno condiviso il video scandalizzate sono le stesse che affermano che il Cristianesimo tradizionale vince il mondo per 2000 anni e che il Socialismo non funziona. Alcune di queste persone erano le stesse persone che dicevano o condividevano agli giovani, 10 o 20 anni fa, che Rede Globo era satanista, che la pornografia faceva gli uomini diventare stupratori e pedofili, che il preservativo aveva micro-fori attraverso i quali passava il virus dell'AIDS e cose di questo livello. Persino una sinistra demoralizzata il cui più grande partito ha perso le elezioni presidenziali sei mesi fa può ancora superare intellettualmente questo tipo di cristiani conservatori, anche all'interno della propria chiesa.

Senza entrare nella questione dei miti che i conservatori cristiani e libertari hanno sulle origini e la solidità delle idee in cui credono, la loro sorpresa con i cristiani di sinistra e i capitalisti di sinistra deriva dall'impreparazione per l'azione sociopolitica, specialmente quando sono non al potere, più la stupefacente ignoranza di ciò che è il movimento socialista.

NOTE E RIFERIMENTI:

[1] "Paganismo", Armando Araújo Silvestre, InfoEscola, https://www.infoescola.com/religiao/paganismo.

[2] "Introduction to Christian Feminism", Christian Feminism Today, https://eewc.com/introduction-christian-feminism.

[3] "About the Libertarian Party", Libertarian Party, https://www.lp.org/about.

[4] "'Jesus sempre foi a nossa referência', diz Gleisi Hoffmann", Gospel Prime, 09 aprile 2019, https://www.gospelprime.com.br/jesus-sempre-foi-a-nossa-referencia-diz-gleisi-hoffmann.

¿Por qué existen cristianos y capitalistas de izquierda?

Abigail Pereira Aranha

No te sientas ofendido cuando digo que entender por qué existen cristianos y capitalistas de izquierda no es difícil si no eres un cristiano conservador o un libertario. Lo explicaré.

El libertario cree que los capitalistas pueden hacer tanto bien al interés público como a las cuentas bancarias de sus empresas si pueden tener tanta libertad en y sobre la sociedad como dentro de sus empresas. El cristiano cree que el Cristianismo puede transformar el mundo en un proyecto del Paraíso si es conocido y seguido por toda la humanidad. Así como el cristiano cree en el Cristianismo mismo y en la fidelidad cristiana del clero al menos en su sección del Cristianismo, el libertario cree en el Capitalismo y en la fidelidad de los capitalistas al Capitalismo. Ahí es donde van mal.

El libertario cree que los países capitalistas desarrollados se desarrollan porque han adoptado el Capitalismo y los grandes capitalistas han beneficiado a la comunidad en general, estos grandes capitalistas se han convertido en lo que son a través de la venta de productos que satisfacen y son valiosos para sus clientes, estos han superado a sus competidores al hacer los mejores productos y servicios a los mejores precios. El cristiano conservador cree que el Cristianismo existe hoy en día porque una docena de plebeyos de Judea se enfrentaron al Imperio Romano hace casi 2000 años. Ambos miran la doctrina y se olvidan de la política.

La versión en sí misma de que la iglesia cristiana comenzó con un movimiento popular en una provincia periférica del Imperio Romano en el año 33, y no en la sede central misma del imperio casi 300 años después, es parte de esa misma acción política. Y cuanto mayor era el poder político-social de las iglesias cristianas tradicionales, más generalizada, más sofocante y menos cuestionable era la "moralidad cristiana", especialmente en el área sexual. Esto ha producido de una producción en masa de hipócritas, depravados de vida dual y neuróticos a escapes colectivos como el Carnaval. Más allá de una epidemia de estupidez y analfabetismo que incluía la quema de libros y la ejecución y el linchamiento de personas por herejía o por una sexualidad menos reprimida. Por cierto, "paganismo" viene de "paganus", campesino en latín: los campesinos resistieron mientras pudieron a la conversión forzada por el Imperio Romano.[1] Si hoy algunos conservadores solo pueden responder a mis ideas bloqueandome en las redes sociales, en aquella época sería simplemente enviar una tropa de mujeres para arrestarme y quemarme cubierta en una plaza pública (porque si un hombre ve uno de los dedos de las manos de Abigail, recibirá su espíritu de ateísmo y prostitución). No hay un país con más del 80% de cristianos hoy en día que no haya sido cristiano desde el comienzo del Cristianismo ni fue colonizado por alguien que lo fue. En cualquier otro, las iglesias cristianas son numéricamente insignificantes y usualmente clandestinas. Hoy en día, las iglesias tradicionales en los países cuya gran mayoría es nominalmente cristiana pierden cada vez más poder político, influencia social, caracterización y, no pocas veces, número de miembros.

El Libertarismo y el Ultralibertarismo (conocido como "Anarcocapitalismo" o "Anarquismo Libertario") ya han empezado mal en el concepto: yo soy un capitalista, el Estado me permite hacer lo que quiero o existe y solo tiene poder para hacer lo que yo decido que él haga. El Manifiesto Comunista ya nos dijo que cuando el capitalista anticomunista habla de libertad y democracia, la libertad es para el Capitalismo y el pueblo de la democracia es la burguesía misma. Karl Marx tenía razón. Así como el Estado socialista solo es antirreligioso porque quiere ser la propia religión, el libertario y el ultralibertario solo son antiestatistas porque quieren ser el propio Estado.

Otro error de los cristianos conservadores y los libertarios es pensar que la ideología de izquierda es una pura antítesis de sus ideas, todo lo que el cristiano y el libertario dicen "no", la izquierda dice "sí". Si hay capitalistas de izquierda, cristianos de izquierda o incluso feministas cristianas[2], esto se debe a que existe alguna posible intersección entre las dos partes. Una intersección del Cristianismo conservador con la izquierda que conozco es la militancia contra el sexo: un lado me pone en el otro y ambos me llaman el objeto sexual de los hombres, eso es porque solo descubrieron mi perfil en Twitter, no con cuántos hombres tuve las dobles penetraciones y las corridas faciales que ellos vieron allí.

Incluso si el Socialismo es la dictadura del proletariado, ¿qué harían estos proletarios en el poder? ¿Cuáles serían los esquemas morales, intelectuales e interpersonales que aportarían a la nueva sociedad? Mejor: ¿por qué sería la sociedad realmente nueva? Pero si llega el Socialismo y la dictadura no es del proletariado, ¿de quién será? Es ahora que entenderás toda esta gira que di.

Quien gobernará en el Socialismo será el movimiento socialista. Y quien no esté en la dictadura del proletariado estará en el proletariado de la dictadura. Entonces, un capitalista puede tratar de ganar la gracia del movimiento socialista para anticiparse y, en el peor de los casos, sobrevivir. Con los cristianos de izquierda, el razonamiento es el mismo. Si alguna religión sobrevive, es porque tiene el permiso del movimiento socialista. Todavía hay una hipótesis que no involucra el amiguismo, pero es preocupante: los cristianos de izquierda y los capitalistas de izquierda no luchan por un lugar en la "camarilla" de la futura élite soviética, sino por los ideales de un mundo mejor, ellos realmente creen en la bella parte del discurso del movimiento socialista. La cosa es peor que un supuesto monopolio de izquierda de la virtud, es la falta de ideas decentes en el lado opuesto más una destrucción casi general de la inteligencia que se manifiesta en la clase rica y en las posiciones de toma de decisiones.

El izquierdismo es casi la única corriente político-ideológica que se manifiesta en las iglesias y en el mundo de los negocios debido a otro problema que los libertarios y conservadores solo le prestaron atención después de ver que la izquierda llegó al poder (no solo en la política formal): pensar que defender una posición ideológica, política o moral es algo para aquellos que no tienen que cumplir con el expediente de trabajo o que tienen un salario para hacer esto. Cuando no pensaban en el circuito casa-trabajo, el cristiano tradicional solo pensaba en el sexo (en atacar el sexo o cualquier contacto hombre-mujer más cercano) y el capitalista tradicional solo pensaba en la ganancia. O así que fueron vistos. Los que eran hermosos en discurso y práctica eran el cristiano de izquierda y el capitalista de izquierda. La política solo dejó de ser tratada por las iglesias cristianas como impía y por la clase de negocios como una tontería cuando ellas hicieron campaña política por el ala izquierda o cuando un gobierno de izquierda sacudió lo que pensaron que era lo más importante.

Tanto entre los cristianos como entre los libertarios, los "puros" no llegan al poder, al menos como regla. Incluso en el Antiguo Testamento de la Biblia, esto sucedió cuando Israel dejó el tiempo de los jueces al tiempo de los reyes. Luego, hasta el cautiverio en Babilonia, las Doce Tribus tenían profetas que eran fieles a la Palabra de Dios tanto con reyes justos como con reyes descuidados o malvados. En el caso de los libertarios, lo que los obstaculiza es la fantasía más el dinerismo más la estupidez. Si nos fijamos en cualquier sitio web libertario o en el trabajo de cualquier escritor o columnista libertario, no hay una propuesta o análisis que no sea, en el mejor de los casos, una interpretación dogmática de cortes sesgados con un éxito casual. Por lo tanto, incluso el Partido Libertario de los Estados Unidos[3] es irrelevante.

Estaba organizando estas palabras en mi cabeza cuando vi una noticia compartida en las redes sociales: la presidente del Partido de los Trabajadores, Gleisi "Lula" Hoffmann, grabó un video junto a un pastor en una invitación a la 1ª Reunión de Evangélicos y Evangélicas del Partido de los Trabajadores[4]. Las personas que compartieron el video escandalizadas son las mismas que dicen que el Cristianismo tradicional supera al mundo hace 2000 años y que el Socialismo no funciona. Algunas de estas personas eran las mismas personas que dijeron o compartieron con los jóvenes, hace 10 o 20 años, que Rede Globo era satanista, que la pornografía hacía que los hombres se convirtieran en violadores y pedófilos, que el condón tenía micro agujeros a través de los cuales pasaba el virus del SIDA, y las cosas en este nivel. Incluso una izquierda desmoralizada cuyo partido más importante ha perdido la elección presidencial hace seis meses todavía puede superar intelectualmente a este tipo de cristianos conservadores, incluso dentro de su propia iglesia.

Sin entrar en la cuestión de los mitos que los cristianos conservadores y los libertarios tienen sobre los orígenes y la solidez de las ideas en las que creen, su sorpresa con los cristianos de izquierda y los capitalistas de izquierda proviene de la falta de preparación para la acción sociopolítica, especialmente cuando no estan en el poder, más la asombrosa ignorancia de lo que es el movimiento socialista.

NOTAS Y REFERENCIAS:

[1] "Paganismo", Armando Araújo Silvestre, InfoEscola, https://www.infoescola.com/religiao/paganismo.

[2] "Introduction to Christian Feminism", Christian Feminism Today, https://eewc.com/introduction-christian-feminism.

[3] "About the Libertarian Party", Libertarian Party, https://www.lp.org/about.

[4] "'Jesus sempre foi a nossa referência', diz Gleisi Hoffmann", Gospel Prime, 09 de abril de 2019, https://www.gospelprime.com.br/jesus-sempre-foi-a-nossa-referencia-diz-gleisi-hoffmann.

Notes about nudity, censorship against anti-leftism on social networks and a woman who is seen by her friends as a woman

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Folks, I won a 7 day suspension on Facebook day before yesterday for sharing nudity. I was sharing a post by a conservative lady. It was a video of a woman peeing beside a bus stop and, in the end, an old man passes next to her and kicks her. It's a professional pornographic video, but the description was as if it was a feminist doing a "performance" and a passer-by reacting. And this "hoax" is from last year, and every time I saw it, I replied more or less as I replied this time[01]:

Folks, the video is old and it's not from Brazil. You can find it in XVideos, for example: XVideos/video24077/girl_pissing_in_public_and_kicked_by_an_old_man. It does not have the date of the post, but it has comments dated 10 years ago.

Someone may have denounced the original post and it hit me. Or someone reported my post specifically. But who would do that? A conservative woman? It's possible, a conservative woman who was scandalized by the image and did not read the text. But can this person be leftist? It's possible, the most amazing thing is to find a leftist with this level of contact with the real people, the level of reading my timeline or the authoress of the original post's timeline. Ah, I was able to retrieve the hyperlink to the original post and the authoress profile, Viviane Oliveira, address and I saw her comment on the report against the post[02]. And in matters of intellectuality, how many conservatives can write 200 characters without so many misspellings? (In the original in Portuguese, they were not adapted here)

Viviane Oliveira March 20, 2019 at 13:54 They denounced the video of the pissing feminist who got kicked in the ass. There are some very angry hairy women, watching my Facebook profile. Smelly cretins, scrape your groins, carrion.

In "levou chute no rabo" in the Portuguese original ("got kicked in the ass"), are two spaces between "chute" and "no", which may not appear as two for you reader, because HTML does not show them. But I'm highlighting this because... it's being normal for me to say one thing today and it to be confirmed next week or a few years later. Including this censorship against sex and anti-leftism AT THE SAME TIME, which I visualized 10 years ago[03] and conservatives do not perceive even today. And I did not visualize it at that epoch as a prediction, but as something that WAS ALREADY HAPPENING. And it's not just this case of this video that I'll comment on this time. And I put the hypothesis that who denounced the video was a conservative woman, not a leftist feminist, it was not by chance or by too much imagination. The hypothesis has to do with the errors in spelling and content of that post: anyone who thinks badly reads badly and writes badly. That post of mine that I quoted is still on my Facebook profile, but it's also the comment I left in Viviane Oliveira's post, so that both her profile readers and those my profile readers who have already seen the video to know the source. Conservatives are not in the habit of giving the source of what they publish on the internet. Or of knowing the source.

And the same day I was blocked, a few hours earlier, I received a memento from a Facebook friend and my blogs reader. He shared in his profile tagging me and I commented[04]:

Bradon Kamato March 19, 2019 at 11:54 Look at it, Abigail Pereira Aranha HYPENESS.COM.BR German supermarket succeeds by offering free products to whose did the shopping naked[05] Abigail Pereira Aranha This is a cool amusement. It reminded me of the movies by Magma I watched as a teenager. And there were even presentable girls. And some boys that made me want to introduce myself to them.[06] Abigail Pereira Aranha "Imagine if this was a fashion in Brazil. Would you go?" It would be cool. If they want to pick me up to see if I'm not carrying a beer can in the middle of my breasts or a bonbon in the middle of my butts, I'll understand it. If it is with the discount of 270 euros, gives 1,157.57 reals today. Then, I arrive at my father's house with a thousand reals of purchases, my family asks and I explain: "I bought in a supermarket that gives a discount of more than 1,000 reals for those who do the shopping naked. And I came by car with two boys I met there. They were going to do a barbecue with friends and I offered to take part and to take some things for them to drink and to taste."[07] Abigail Pereira Aranha Ah, and I went to see how much the euro was worth, I found The Money Converter: https://themoneyconverter.com/EUR/BRL.aspx THEMONEYCONVERTER.COM Convert Euro to Brazilian Real | EUR to BRL Currency Converter[08]

This friend and reader is the same who shared with me a tribute to the prostitutes on International Women's Day[09], who also shared this article with me in November 2017[10]:

November 02, 2017 at 17:21 Ha, ha, ha, ha! The coterie's ideas. Abigail Pereira Aranha, I thought of you! Woman develops "super IQ" after having ingested sperm every day for a year A UCLA female student says she has just reached the highest score in history on an IQ test designed by Mensa, and she says her surprising result is due to her daily sperm intake. SEMPREQUESTIONE.COM[11]

March 8 was a Friday. The following Sunday, I went to visit my father and he told me that he and my sisters saw the homage on my profile and they (my sisters) were horrified, he not so much. Ah, and I showed them the other post, that in 2017. One of my sisters, the only one who was there at that time, asked me how I feel when I see that my friends see prostitution and they remember me. I replied that I feel that my male friends see me as a friend and as a woman. And I asked my father: "has any friend of yours told you that he wants to fuck you?" He replied: "no way". And I completed: "several of my friends on the internet want it. It has to do with I am a woman". My brothers, my sisters and some cousins and nephews arrived later, the conversation was very super, philosophical and educational. And I myself asked the question: "how can a friend of mine who thinks I am smart, friendly and amusing think of penetrating my asshole and filling my mouth with sperm?" The joke was so philosophical that the family did not even know what to think.

The same day I was suspended on Facebook, I saw this post by Leandro Ruschel dated one month before[12]:

Leandro Ruschel @leandroruschel On Twitter, we have a terrorist group, PCC, VERIFIED account of a mythomaniac that simulated her own kidnapping and blamed a deputy. Besides of all pornography. But Joaquim Teixeira's jokes are unacceptable to the network. He was blocked today in all profiles. Censorship! 10:32 - February 18, 2019

I already had the answer almost ready in my mind when I saw this other post in that same day[13]:

Beto Duarte (Águias Parapente) @dp_norberto Inauguration of a paint store! That's the question: what is happening with "some" women in Brazil? Is it a reflection of the professionalization of prostitution? Or of the maxim that says that the clothes (or absence of it), does not say who I am? #TheShameIsOver 17:54 - March 19, 2019

Inauguração de loja de tinta!!!
Aí fica aquela pergunta no ar: "O que está acontecendo com "algumas" mulheres no Brasil. Será que é reflexo da Profissionalização da prostituição??? Ou da máxima que diz que a roupa (ou ausência dela), não diz quem eu sou???#AcabouAVergonha pic.twitter.com/R9Ukbu7Ppi

— Beto?? Duarte (Águias Parapente) (@dp_norberto) 19 de março de 2019

Once again an sourceless, undated, non-referenced video shared by a conservative. But after some work, I discovered the background of the story. I'll copy here what I found on the Novinhas do Whatsapp website, published November past year[14]:

Roberto Tintas inaugurates with some hotties

Roberto Tintas inaugurates his store with some hotties nude only with body painting dancing, curling their big butts! This Roberto Tintas is a genius in Marketing, he put some naked bombshells wagging their butts in front of the store and it was a total success!

The post has two other videos, one minute each. I'll leave the comments to the boys because I'm hetero.

So, I replied to Beto Duarte by sharing the Leandro Ruschel's post and soon thereafter vice versa:

Abigail P. Aranha

@AbigailPAranha

In reply to @dp_norberto[15]

Abigail P. Aranha retweeted Leandro Ruschel

Look, a month ago, a conservative profile was suspended: [reference 12]. You have tried to erase sex and even to kill the sex workers inside and outside the internet. When you only had the internet as a channel, the left-wing used the Inquisition to burn the fathers.

Leandro Ruschel @leandroruschel

On Twitter, we have a terrorist group, PCC, VERIFIED account of a mythomaniac that simulated her own kidnapping and blamed a deputy. Besides of all pornography.

But Joaquim Teixeira's jokes are unacceptable to the network. He was blocked…

19:38 - March 19, 2019

Abigail P. Aranha

@AbigailPAranha

In reply to @leandroruschel[16]

Abigail P. Aranha retweeted Beto Duarte (Águias Parapente)

Look, a month later, we have this video and an indignation: [reference 13]. You have tried to erase sex and even to kill the sex workers inside and outside the internet. When you only had the internet as a channel, the left-wing used the Inquisition to burn the fathers.

This Tweet is unavailable.

19:48 - March 19, 2019

The Leandro Ruschel's post and especially the Viviane Oliveira's denounced post were what I wrote 9 days ago[17]:

20) Why are conservatives sometimes victims, on Facebook and some public wi-fi networks, of the same censorship that blocks nudity and sex? Conservatives have already tried the blockage of the Internet against nudity, pornography and sexual services in the 1990s and 2000s. When they failed to achieve this blockade by political means, they had software for that blockage on networks that were within their reach. This tries to be what they did when the Catholic Church or some Protestant church was in political power. But Conservatism has lost political power and more and more the credibility. Then the left-wing came to the presidency of the republic (not only in Brazil) and the conservatives lost even a large part of the formal political representation that still remained. And the overwhelming majority of the people in general as well as of the administrations of computer networks and social networks were divided into Conservative Christians with problems with sex and leftists also with problems with sex (at least the hetero). There, the leftist movement, even where the government was not formally socialist, was able to use the Puritan facade to block the Puritans. The mere possibility that we can still see on the Internet a video of a half-naked woman doing a sensual dance has the same explanation as why we still had, in countries like Brazil, a right-wing gathered in social networks during leftist governments: the conservatives did not have time to make a Victorian dictatorship and the twenty-first century Left did not have neither the time nor the credibility to make its own dictatorship in the name of the folks.

NOTES AND REFERENCES:

[01] Abigail Pereira Aranha, March 17, 2019 at 21:22, https://web.facebook.com/abigail.pereira.aranha/posts/1553544151457135.

[02] Viviane Oliveira, March 20, 2019 at 13:54, https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2017208255073287&set=a.670118329782293.

[03] "Em nome da proteção às crianças e aos adolescentes, vamos dar apoio a um Estado fascista-muçulmanóide?", January 05, 2009, A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade, http://avezdasmulheres.blogspot.com/2009/01/em-nome-da-protecao-as-criancas-e-aos.html; and A Vez dos Homens que Prestam, https://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2009/01/em-nome-da-protecao-as-criancas-e-aos.html.

[04] Bradon Kamato, March 19, 2019 at 11:54, https://web.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1172750886236707&id=100005054207926.

[05] "Supermercado alemão faz sucesso ao oferecer produtos grátis para quem fizesse compras pelado", Hypeness, April 13, 2016, https://www.hypeness.com.br/2016/04/supermercado-alemao-faz-sucesso-ao-oferecer-produtos-gratis-para-quem-fizesse-compras-pelado.

[06] Abigail Pereira Aranha, March 19, 2019 at 13:44, https://web.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1172750886236707&id=100005054207926&comment_id=1172806386231157.

[07] Abigail Pereira Aranha, March 19, 2019 at 14:16, https://web.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1172750886236707&id=100005054207926&comment_id=1172821689562960.

[08] Abigail Pereira Aranha, March 19, 2019 at 14:21, https://web.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1172750886236707&id=100005054207926&comment_id=1172824046229391.

[09] Piece 27 of "Notes on breasts and politics - part 5 of 5", March 13, 2019, Réflexion et Temps Libre avec Abigail, https://avezdasmulheres2.blogspot.com/2019/03/notes-on-politics-part-5.html#topico27; and Amélioration et Amusement des Hommes avec Abigail, https://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2019/03/notes-on-politics-part-5.html#topico27.

[10] Note 8 of "Diário filosófico da Abigail P. Aranha: Queermuseu, La Bête, pedofilia, fundamentalismo sertanejo, política brasileira e diversão dos amigos homens - bloco 5 de 8", November 14, 2017, A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade, https://avezdasmulheres.blogspot.com/2017/11/diario-filosofico-fundamentalismo-sertanejo-e-diversao-bloco-5.html#bloco5_nota08; and A Vez dos Homens que Prestam, https://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2017/11/diario-filosofico-fundamentalismo-sertanejo-e-diversao-bloco-5.html#bloco5_nota08.

[11] "Mulher desenvolve 'super QI' depois de ter ingerido esperma todos os dias durante um ano", Sempre Questione, December 02, 2016, http://www.semprequestione.com/2016/12/mulher-desenvolve-super-qi-depois-de.html.

[12] Leandro Ruschel, February 18, 2019 at 10:32, https://twitter.com/leandroruschel/status/1097489151631507456.

[13] Beto Duarte (Águias Parapente), March 19, 2019 at 17:54, https://twitter.com/dp_norberto/status/1108109634299154434.

[14] "Roberto Tintas inaugura com umas gostosas", Novinhas do Whatsapp, November 20, 2018, https://novinhasdozapzap.com/flagras/roberto-tintas-inaugura-com-umas-gostosas.

[15] Abigail P. Aranha, March 19, 2019 at 19:38, https://twitter.com/AbigailPAranha/status/1108135686979444737.

[16] Abigail P. Aranha, March 19, 2019 at 19:48, https://twitter.com/AbigailPAranha/status/1108138284415414277.

[17] Piece 20 of "Notes on breasts and politics - part 4 of 5", March 12, 2019, Réflexion et Temps Libre avec Abigail, https://avezdasmulheres2.blogspot.com/2019/03/notes-on-politics-part-4.html#topico20; and Amélioration et Amusement des Hommes avec Abigail, https://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2019/03/notes-on-politics-part-4.html#topico20.

	Questo testo in italiano senza video di dissolutezza in Réflexion et Temps Libre avec Abigail: "Note su nudità, censura contro l'anti-sinistrismo sui social network e una donna che è vista dai suoi amici come una donna", https://avezdasmulheres2.blogspot.com/2019/03/note-su-nudita-censura-contro-l-anti-sinistrismo.html.
	Questo testo in italiano con video di dissolutezza in Amélioration et Amusement des Hommes avec Abigail: "Note su nudità, censura contro l'anti-sinistrismo sui social network e una donna che è vista dai suoi amici come una donna", https://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2019/03/note-su-nudita-censura-contro-l-anti-sinistrismo.html.
	Ce texte en français sans vidéos de libertinage au Réflexion et Temps Libre avec Abigail: "Notes sur nudité, censure contre l'anti-gauchisme sur les réseaux sociaux et une femme qui est vue par ses amis comme une femme", https://avezdasmulheres2.blogspot.com/2019/03/notes-sur-nudite-censure-contre-l-anti-gauchisme.html.
	Ce texte en français avec vidéos de libertinage au Amélioration et Amusement des Hommes avec Abigail: "Notes sur nudité, censure contre l'anti-gauchisme sur les réseaux sociaux et une femme qui est vue par ses amis comme une femme", https://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2019/03/notes-sur-nudite-censure-contre-l-anti-gauchisme.html.
	Eso texto en español sin vídeos de putaría en Réflexion et Temps Libre avec Abigail: "Notas sobre desnudez, censura contra el anti-izquierdismo en las redes sociales y una mujer que es vista por sus amigos como una mujer", https://avezdasmulheres2.blogspot.com/2019/03/notas-sobre-desnudez-censura-contra-el-anti-izquierdismo.html.
	Eso texto en español con vídeos de putaría en Amélioration et Amusement des Hommes avec Abigail: "Notas sobre desnudez, censura contra el anti-izquierdismo en las redes sociales y una mujer que es vista por sus amigos como una mujer", https://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2019/03/notas-sobre-desnudez-censura-contra-el-anti-izquierdismo.html.
	This text in English without licentiousness videos at Réflexion et Temps Libre avec Abigail: "Notes about nudity, censorship against anti-leftism on social networks and a woman who is seen by her friends as a woman", https://avezdasmulheres2.blogspot.com/2019/03/notes-about-nudity-censorship-against-anti-leftism.html.
	This text in English with licentiousness videos at Amélioration et Amusement des Hommes avec Abigail: "Notes about nudity, censorship against anti-leftism on social networks and a woman who is seen by her friends as a woman", https://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2019/03/notes-about-nudity-censorship-against-anti-leftism.html.
	Texto original em português sem vídeos de putaria no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade: "Notas sobre nudez, censura ao antiesquerdismo nas redes sociais e uma mulher que é vista pelos amigos como mulher", https://avezdasmulheres.blogspot.com/2019/03/notas-sobre-nudez-censura-ao-antiesquerdismo.html.
	Texto original em português com vídeos de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam: "Notas sobre nudez, censura ao antiesquerdismo nas redes sociais e uma mulher que é vista pelos amigos como mulher", https://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2019/03/notas-sobre-nudez-censura-ao-antiesquerdismo.html.