dimanche 26 juin 2011

El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - parte 5: por que los hombres "defienden" a sus mujeres

Eso texto en español (con fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Para Hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas en Blogger): El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - parte 5: por que los hombres "defienden" a sus mujeres, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2011/06/el-machismo-fue-creado-por-las-mujeres.html
Eso texto en español (sin fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Paraíso Tangible en Wordpress): El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - parte 5: por que los hombres "defienden" a sus mujeres, http://avezdoshomens2.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/el-machismo-fue-creado-por-las-mujeres-parte-5/
This text in English (with sex pics and movies, at A Vez das Mulheres at Thumblogger): Machismo was created by women - part 5: why men "defend" their women, http://avezdasmulheres.thumblogger.com/home/log/2011/25/machismo-was-created-by-wo.html
This text in English (without sex pics and movies, at Paraíso Concreto): Machismo was created by women - part 5: why men "defend" their women, http://paraisoconcreto.blogspot.com/2011/06/machismo-was-created-by-women-part-5.html
Texto original em português (com fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam): O machismo foi criado pelas mulheres - parte 5: por que os homens "defendem" suas mulheres, http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2011/06/o-machismo-foi-criado-pelas-mulheres.html
Texto original em português (sem fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade): O machismo foi criado pelas mulheres - parte 5: por que os homens "defendem" suas mulheres, http://avezdasmulheres.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/o-machismo-foi-criado-pelas-mulheres-parte-5/

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Conocemos hombres que vigilan a sus novias, sus esposas, sus hermanas, sus madres. Que prohíben a sus mujeres a estar en la calle hasta tarde, trabajar fuera de casa, estudiar en el colegio, ir al chat, tener un perfil de red social. Halagan a los móviles, leen correos electrónicos, ahuyentan a los amigos varones y algunas amigas mujeres de ella, llaman varias veces al día preguntando dónde está y qué está haciendo. Todavía ellos pueden decir "tengo que proteger lo que es mío". En el pasado, algunos reyes tenían muchas mujeres y pusieron eunucos para vigilarlas. El tutor era eunuco exactamente para no disfrutar de la variedad. ¿Tiene sentido decir que estos hombres prendían a sus mujeres porque juzgaban que ellas son sus propiedades? Lo hace. Pero hay otra explicación que se puede hacer aún más sentido.

Oh, voy más allá y responder a dos preguntas más que mucha gente piensa que tiene las respuestas. ¿Por qué los hombres escapaban de morir por adulterio? ¿Y por qué los violadores incluso en la cárcel tienen que estar separados de los otros presos?

Imagine un cerdo capitalista, o un dueño de esclavos muy malo. ¿Una persona así puede tener un socio, un compañero para alguno interese de los dos? Puede. Supongamos, Onofre y Arístides son dueños de esclavos abominables, evasores de impuestos, deshonestos, que maltratan a sus esclavos extremadamente, y ellos tienen un negocio en común. ¿Onofre puede prestar algunos esclavos a Arístides? Él puede, ¿no? ¿Onofre puede prestar algunas máquinas a Arístides, o incluso ambos pueden conseguir algunas máquinas juntos? Pueden, ¿no? ¿Onofre y Arístides pueden utilizar la misma propiedad? Pueden, ¿no?

¿Y si Onofre sorprender a su esposa, su hija, su hermana o incluso a su amante en la cama con Arístides? ¿O no fue ni en la cama, pero sentada en el sofá en la casa de la Arístides?

Ahora, vamos a considerar dos buenas personas capitalistas, porque no todos los capitalistas son hijos del Diablo. Pedro y Reginaldo son amables, generosos incluyendo con sus empleados, honestos, y más allá de capitalistas son también mucho amigos con un negocio en común. ¿Pedro puede prestar algunos empleados a Reginaldo? Él puede, ¿no? ¿Pedro puede prestar algunas máquinas a Reginaldo, o incluso ambos pueden conseguir algunas máquinas juntos? Pueden, ¿no? ¿Pedro y Reginaldo pueden utilizar la misma propiedad? Pueden, ¿no?

¿Y si Pedro sorprender a su esposa, su hija o su hermana en la cama con Reginaldo?

Pedro va a quedarse por lo menos molesto con Reginaldo. Pero Onofre va a querer matar a Arístides.

¡Espera un poco! Si las mujeres son propiedades de los hombres y ellos comparten varias propiedades, ¿por qué exactamente estas ellos no comparten?

Y por el contrario, que los hombres son propiedad de mujeres, tiene más sentido? ¿Las mujeres, por ejemplo, dividen los hombres? Vamos a ver:


  1. Pesquisa muestra que las mujeres juzgan los hombres más interesantes cuando saben que ellos son casados.

  2. En el pasado, una mujer era engañada por su marido, ella lo sabía, pero mantuvo el matrimonio. La gente de más edad recuerda. Es sólo hoy en día que la mujer pone fin a un noviazgo o un matrimonio cuando ella descubre que su hombre tiene mucho contacto con otra mujer.

  3. ¿Una mujer que sale con un hombre bellaco y mujeriego piensa que ello está solo con ella? Difícilmente.


¿Y cuando usted escuchó a una mujer se quejar de que su novio o esposo es celoso? A veces. ¿Pero cuando usted escuchó a una mujer se quejar que no puede tener relaciones sexuales con un hombre guapísimo, consultar los sitios de malicia, mirar un hombre sexy por el novio o el marido celoso? Nunca. Un hombre viendo una mujer más presentable en las calles y se lamentando a otro hombre porque él es casado usted hay visto.

¿Has oído hablar de una mujer que rompe con su familia, rompe con su lugar de origen, enfrenta al mundo, los arriesga incluso su vida para casarse con un hombre de otra raza, otra religión, incluso un sinvergüenza como los demás, no? ¿Por qué es sólo para dejar a un marido que golpea, que viola, que humilla para ser más feliz solo o con un buen hombre que existe la cultura, la dependencia económica, lo tener que tener a un hombre, etc?

¿Usted entiende a dónde quiero llegar? Si es tan malo para una mujer utilizar el apellido del marido cuando se casa, no salir a la calle solo, usar ropa larga, volver a casa temprano, no trabajar fuera de su casa, no hablar con los hombres, etc, ¿por qué es sólo con los peores trastes que esta mujer no habla de la libertad, y con frecuencia se siente aún amada, protegida? Cuando en un folletín una mujer está en un matrimonio horrible y tiene relación con otro hombre que la trata bien mejor, sigue siendo que es la televisión que tiene pacto con el Diablo haciendo una campaña para destruir a la familia. Mujer sólo engaña o tiene sexo sin compromiso para hacer carrera o tomar venganza de sus padres o esposo. O cuando se encuentra con un bellaco y quedase mojada.

¿Y por qué el adulterio, que no es más que un hombre disfrutar de la mujer de otro, era castigado con la muerte, e incluso en Brasil también fue un delito hasta menos de 10 años? Incluso sin problemas de la cárcel o la muerte, incluso la amistad de décadas entre dos hombres termina sólo porque uno anduvo con la esposa o la amante de otro. Si en lugar de ser la esposa fuera el coche que uno tiene y el otro usó sin que lo otro supiese no haría esta confusión.

Y si los hombres veían a las mujeres como objetos, ¿por qué la violación ha sido siempre un crimen, antes castigada con la muerte? ¿Parece una pregunta tonta? No es así, voy a explicar por qué.

En el Antiguo Testamento, una persona podía entrar a la plantación de otra para comer (Deuteronomio 23: 24, 25), algo que si usted lo hace en el Brasil del siglo 21, dependiendo de quién es el propietario, le golpearán con una cachiporra. Aún en el Antiguo Testamento, cuando se cosecha y una espiga caiga en tierra, tenía que estar allí para que los pobres vienen tomar (Deuteronomio 24: 19 a 21). Aún en el Antiguo Testamento, el ladrón no era castigado con la muerte, él tuvo que devolver el robado con adiciones, y si él trataba de robar en la noche y fuera muerto, el que lo mató era condenado. Mira:



1 Cuando alguno hurtare buey ú oveja, y le degollare ó vendiere, por aquel buey pagará cinco bueyes, y por aquella oveja cuatro ovejas.

2 Si el ladrón fuere hallado forzando una casa, y fuere herido y muriere, el que le hirió no será culpado de su muerte.

3 Si el sol hubiere sobre él salido, el matador será reo de homicidio: el ladrón habrá de restituir cumplidamente; si no tuviere, será vendido por su hurto.

4 Si fuere hallado con el hurto en la mano, sea buey ó asno ú oveja vivos, pagará el duplo.

7 Cuando alguno diere á su prójimo plata ó alhajas á guardar, y fuere hurtado de la casa de aquel hombre, si el ladrón se hallare, pagará el doble.

8 Si el ladrón no se hallare, entonces el dueño de la casa será presentado á los jueces, para ver si ha metido su mano en la hacienda de su prójimo.

Éxodo 22: 1 a 4, 7, 8



¿Por qué si era con una mujer la tolerancia era tan más baja?

¿Cuántas veces usted ha visto a un hombre celoso queriendo "defender" a su mujer y usted dijo o vio a un hombre decir que ella no es su propiedad? Y desas veces, ¿cuántas veces la mujer apoyó quien lo dijo? ¿O cuántas veces la propia mujer fue la primera en decir que no es su propiedad?

¿Cuántas veces un hombre quiere empezar una conversación con una mujer sola, o incluso demorase más en mirarla, y la propia mujer, dice que ella está comprometida para ahuyentar el hombre?

Volviendo a las dos preguntas que me comprometió a responder antes y después llegaré a la conclusión:


¿Por qué los hombres escapaban de morir por adulterio?



La complicidad de los hombres? Bueno. Incluso hoy en día un hombre puede poner fin a una amistad con otro porque quedó locamente enamorado de una perra cualquiera. Y incluso hoy en día hay hombres que sorprenden sus esposas con otro hombre y son los primeros a querer por lo menos golpearlo con una cachiporra. El control social del patriarcado sobre la sexualidad de las mujeres? ¿Quién está realmente interesado en una sociedad en la que el sexo sólo puede ocurrir dentro del matrimonio, o incluso el contacto de un hombre y una mujer mal ocurre sólo dentro de la familia? Lindo, voy a dar la respuesta y si usted pensó dentro de la propaganda feminista, no quiero que parezca que estoy te llamando estúpido. Un grupo de hombres casados con mujeres feas, analfabetas, aburridas y reprimidas sexualmente descubre que una mujer hizo sexo fuera del matrimonio, o con un hombre casado, y ellos se juntarán para matar a esta señora? Usted mismo, está viviendo en un lugar tosco y está en un matrimonio insoportable y usted sabe que una mujer está cometiendo adulterio, usted querrá la muerte de la mujer o su número de teléfono? Así que, para responder a la pregunta: los hombres siempre han sido los proveedores, entonces matar a un hombre por adulterio era un tiro en el pie. La lapidación por adulterio existe (por desgracia, aún hoy en día) para las mujeres controlaren unos a otras. Por cierto, ¿has visto a una mujer fea que es el amante?

Los hombres son entrenados por las mujeres como pitbulls para ayudar a sus mujeres a permanecer lejos de los hombres. Luego, con un gran costo que un hombre puede ver la pierna de una mujer desnuda, ver a un coño, encontrar a una prostituta, o incluso hablar con una mujer que no es de su familia o su esposa. Los hombres no protegen a sus mujeres, son las mujeres que se mantienen alejadas de los hombres con la ayuda de los hombres machistas que han sido educados por ellas con el fin de dominar y controlar los hombres.



¿Y por qué los violadores incluso en la cárcel tienen que estar separados de los otros presos?



¿Has entendido ahora? Los niños, educados en el machismo creado por mujeres, tales como pitbulls entrenados, creen que un hombre coger a una mujer contra su voluntad es peor que matar y descuartizar. Conclusión: lesbonazismo siempre ha existido, lo que está terminando no es el patriarcado, es aquello mundo que es muy malo para que las mujeres posan rechazar los hombres.


La serie "El machismo fue creado por las mujeres" en español

Machismo was created by women - part 5: why men "defend" their women

Eso texto en español (con fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Para Hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas en Blogger): El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - parte 5: por que los hombres "defienden" a sus mujeres, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2011/06/el-machismo-fue-creado-por-las-mujeres.html
Eso texto en español (sin fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Paraíso Tangible en Wordpress): El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - parte 5: por que los hombres "defienden" a sus mujeres, http://avezdoshomens2.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/el-machismo-fue-creado-por-las-mujeres-parte-5/
This text in English (with sex pics and movies, at A Vez das Mulheres at Thumblogger): Machismo was created by women - part 5: why men "defend" their women, http://avezdasmulheres.thumblogger.com/home/log/2011/25/machismo-was-created-by-wo.html
This text in English (without sex pics and movies, at Paraíso Concreto): Machismo was created by women - part 5: why men "defend" their women, http://paraisoconcreto.blogspot.com/2011/06/machismo-was-created-by-women-part-5.html
Texto original em português (com fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam): O machismo foi criado pelas mulheres - parte 5: por que os homens "defendem" suas mulheres, http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2011/06/o-machismo-foi-criado-pelas-mulheres.html
Texto original em português (sem fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade): O machismo foi criado pelas mulheres - parte 5: por que os homens "defendem" suas mulheres, http://avezdasmulheres.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/o-machismo-foi-criado-pelas-mulheres-parte-5/

Abigail Pereira Aranha

We know men who surveil their girlfriends, their wives, their sisters, their mothers. They forbid their women to stay out late, working out of home, study in the college, going into chat, to have social networking profile. Flatter the mobile, read emails, chase away male friends and some female friends of hers, call several times a day wondering where she is and what she is doing. They can still say "I have to protect what is mine". In the past, some kings had many women and put eunuchs to guard them. The guardian was eunuch just to not enjoy the variety. Does it makes sense to say that these men hold their women because they feel that they are their properties? Does. But there is another explanation that can make even more sense.

Oh, I'll further answer two more questions that lot of people think they have the answers. Why do men escaped to die for adultery? And why rapists even in jail have to be segregated from other prisoners?

Imagine a capitalist pig, or a slave master very ordinary. A person like this can have a partner, a companion for any interest of the two? Can. Let's suppose, Onofre and Aristides are abominable slave owners, tax evaders, dishonests, that mistreat extremely their slaves, and they have a business in common. Onofre can lend some slaves to Aristides? He can, right? Onofre can lend some machines to Aristides, or even both can get some machines together? They can, right? Onofre and Aristides can use the same property? They can, right?

And what if Onofre catches his wife, his daughter, his sister or even his lover in bed with Aristides? Or it was neither in bed, but sitting on the sofa in the Aristides' house?

Now, let's take two capitalist good people, because not every capitalist is son of the Devil. Peter and Reginald are friendly, generous including with their employees, honest, and more than capitalists they are also friends with a great deal in common. Peter can lend some employees to Reginald? He can, right? Peter can lend some machines to Reginald, or even both can get some machines together? They can, right? Peter and Reginald can use the same property? They can, right?

And if Peter catches his wife, his daughter, or his sister in bed with Reginald?

Peter will be at least upset with Reginald. But Onofre will want to kill Aristides.

Wait a minute! If women are properties of men and they share many properties, why just these they do not share?

And the opposite, that men are properties of women, it makes more sense? Do women, for example, divide men? Let's see:

  1. Research shows that women find men more interesting when they know that they are married.
  2. In the past, a woman was cheated by her husband, she knew, but kept the marriage. The older people remember. It is today that the woman ends a dating or a marriage when she discovers that her man has many contact with another woman.
  3. A woman who goes out with a man who is scroundel and flirts another women thinks he is alone with her? Hardly.

And when you heard a woman complain that her boyfriend or husband is jealous? Sometimes. But when you heard a woman complain she can't have sex with a gorgeous man, see naughtiness sites, looking for a nice man because of the jealous boyfriend or husband? Never. A man seeing a woman more presentable on the streets and lamenting to another man because he's married you've ever seen.

Have you heard of a woman who breaks with her family, breaks with her place of origin, faces the world, risks even her life to marry a man of another race, another religion, even a rascal like others, is not it? Why is it just to leave a husband who hits, who rape, who humiliates to be happier alone or with a nice man that there is culture, economic dependency, having to have a man, etc.?

Do you understood where I want to get? If it's all that bad for a woman to use the husband's surname when she get married, do not go out on the street alone, wear long clothes, back home early, do not work out her home, do not talk to men, etc., why is it just with the worst frets that this woman does not speak about freedom, and often still feels loved, protected? When in a soap-opera a woman is in a horrible marriage and has affair with another man that is better, it's still the television which has pact with the Devil campaigning to destroy the family. Woman only cheats or have sex without commitment to get ahead or take revenge of her parents or husband. Or when meets a bastard and gets wet.

And why the adultery, which is nothing more than a man enjoying another's wife, was punished with death, and even in Brazil was also a crime until less than 10 years ago? Even without problems in prison or death, even friendship of decades between two men ends up just because one went around with the wife or the mistress of another. If instead of being the wife was the car which one has and the other wore without the other know won't make this turmoil.

And if men saw women as objects, why rape has always been crime, formerly punished with death? It seems a silly question? It is not, I'll explain why.

In the Old Testament, a person could enter the planted ground of another to eat (Deuteronomy 23: 24, 25), something that if you do in Brazil of the 21th century, depending on who is the owner, you'll be clubbed. Still in the Old Testament, when it was harvest and a ear fell on ground, it had to stay there for the poor to come and gather (Deuteronomy 24: 19 to 21). Still in the Old Testament, the thief was not punished with death, he had to return the stolen with additions, and if he tried to steal in the night and was dead, the one who killed him was convicted. Look:

1 If a man shall steal an ox, or a sheep, and kill it, or sell it; he shall restore five oxen for an ox, and four sheep for a sheep.

2 If a thief be found breaking up, and be smitten that he die, [there shall] no blood [be shed] for him.

3 If the sun be risen upon him, [there shall be] blood [shed] for him; [for] he should make full restitution; if he have nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft.

4 If the theft be certainly found in his hand alive, whether it be ox, or ass, or sheep; he shall restore double.

7 If a man shall deliver unto his neighbour money or stuff to keep, and it be stolen out of the man's house; if the thief be found, let him pay double.

8 If the thief be not found, then the master of the house shall be brought unto the judges, [to see] whether he have put his hand unto his neighbour's goods.

Exodus 22: 1 to 4, 7, 8

Why if it was with women the tolerance was so lower?

How many times have you seen a jealous man wanting to "defend" his woman and you said or saw a man say that she is not his property? And those times, how many times the woman supported who said it? Or how many times the woman herself was the first to say she is not his property?

How many times a man wants to start a conversation with a woman alone, or even look at her more time, and the woman herself says she is committed to scare away the man?

Returning to the two questions that I promised to answer in the back and then I will conclude:

Why do men escaped to die for adultery?

Complicity of men? Okay. Even today a man can end a friendship with other because he was madly in love with some bitch. And today there are men who catch with their wifes with another man and are the first to want to at least club him. Social control of patriarchy on women's sexuality? Who is really interested in a society in which sex can only happen within marriage, or even the touch of a man and a woman badly happens only within family Cute, I will give the answer and if you thought within the feminist propaganda, I do not look like I am calling you stupid. A bunch of married men with ugly, illiterate, boring and sexually repressed women discovers that a woman slept outside marriage, or with a married man, and they will join to kill this lady? You yourself, are living in an ordinary place and is in a unbearable marriage and you know that a woman is commiting adultery, you'll want the death of the woman or her phone number? So, to answer the question: men have always been providers, then kill a man for adultery was a shot in the foot. The stoning for adultery exists (unfortunately, even today) for women to control each other. By the way, have you seen an ugly woman that is lover?

Men are trained by the women like pitbulls to help their women to stay away from men. Then, at great cost a man might see a bare woman's leg, see a pussy, find a prostitute, or even talk to a woman who is not of his family or wife. Men do not protect their women, are the women who stay away from men with the help of macho men who were educated by them in order to dominate and control men.

And why rapists even in jail have to be segregated from other prisoners?

Got it now? The boys, educated in the machismo created by women, such as pitbulls trained, find that a man fuck a woman against her will is worse than killing and dismembering. Conclusion: lesbonazism has always existed, which is ending is not the patriarchy, is that world too bad for the women to be able to reject men.

The serie "Machismo was created by women" in English (on Paraíso Concreto)

mardi 24 mai 2011

Fighting discrimination is a thing of lesbians and queers, let's respect only who and what deserves it

Abigail Pereira Aranha

  1. Karl Marx was a white and European man, and thought the world with no divisions in countries, without religions and without exploitation of man by man. Mikhail Bakunin, anarchist thinker, too. But we can find the world more fair because only a poor black girl is in college because of the quota system (note: in Brazil, colleges and universities have quota systems benefiting black people and former public school students).

  2. No one was born yesterday to have what to hear from an intelligent person, but any woman who has reached age 60 without having read a book or had an orgasm has a lot to teach.

  3. A moody young man, with a horrible childhood, full of bitterness and mother since the age of 15 have early maturity. A young man with a critical sense who knows how the world might be better has not woken up to life.

  4. Mastercard and Visa are still accepting donations for the Klu Klux Klan and the Swiss banks deny access to data on financial transactions of people involved in drug, women or weapons trafficking or terrorism. But MasterCard and Visa decided to terminate their partnership with the WikiLeaks, and Swiss bank where Julian Assange had an account decided to block it because WikiLeaks has published secret documents from the Pentagon and a bunch more that has much to hide. (See, in Portuguese, "O povo contra Julian A.", by Walter Hupsel)

  5. "If a woman has a job where only men work she is pioneering, if a man has a job where only women work he's queer; a man who hits a woman is coward, a woman who hits a man is brave (not that I support a man hits a woman, it never); a betrayed woman is a victim, a betrayed man is a cheated." (Émerson, commentary on text "O mito do poder masculino" (The myth of male power) , published in Paraíso Concreto)

  6. "When a black man uses the '100% black with pride' shirt, a historical reading of the sentence translates: 'I belong to an ethnic group that was oppressed throughout history, but I'm proud of it and grieve for her to have the same rights the other'. When a white man uses the '100% white, with pride' shirt, a historical reading of the sentence translates: 'I'm racist'". (Túlio Vianna , professor of criminal law at UFMG - Federal University in Minas Gerais)

  7. "When gay people make their 'Gay Pride Parade', they manifest themselves for respect to their sexual orientation. When heterosexuals people make a 'Heterosexual Pride Parade' they express their intolerance for diverse sexual orientations." (same Túlio Vianna)

  8. "When a woman is beaten by her husband, she is beaten by from centuries of subjugation of women to men. When a husband is beaten by his wife, he is simply a coward." (again, Túlio Vianna)

  9. Someone can exalt women and cite 10 women who made something important to the world. Before anyone cites 20 men who made something in the same areas, will be called a macho or will hear the victimist lesbian speech.

  10. Before anyone cites 10 names of white scientists and thinkers, will hear that blacks raised Brazil with their slave labor.

  11. When two non-white people stuck in time and in life make war against each other, it is ethnic conflict. When whites come and kill some hundreds of them (with bad intentions, it is true), it is genocide.

  12. Any culture without written language should be preserved. Just for not being white.

  13. Africa has always been a horrible continent full of ignorant people dominated by scavengers from them ourselves, but African slaves built Brazil. America was populated by Indians who believed in Astrology, but they teach us to care for nature. Europeans arrived in the two continents and put them into the civilized world, but they were the bad guys who killed people and cultures.

  14. Who ever heard at least one of the expressions take the hand of the nose and raise your hand:

    - Women will and should dominate the world because then everything will be better world

    - A woman has personality traits higher and more moral than men

    - Fathers are good for nothing

    - Men should not be more like women because they are superior emotionally

    - The world's tragedies and wars are faults of crude personality traits man. Women give more peace to the world and fewer crises, the world would be a better place for everyone.

    Now imagine the following scene: I come here and say, "Well people I think the world should be dominated by whites. Because whites are emotionally superior to blacks and have higher traces of organization. Notice Africa. Africa is a shit because it is dominated by blacks. Let the whites dominate and then the world will have more peace and less tribal wars". Well, if I wrote it on my blog seriously, the other day the Federal Police would enter in my house, eat all my Doritos, delete my porn movies and put me in the Suburban beating in my head with their shit rifles.

    (Sílvio Koerich)

  15. Religions and religious divisions have made their adherents hate, deny rights, assault and kill ones the adherents of others. But a ruthless criminal has not God in the heart.


  16. An atheist may find it absurd a woman to be killed accused of sex outside of marriage in the twenty-first century in an Islamic country. But one person is better just because have a religion and our laws are based on the Ten Commandments.

  17. The ATEA (Brazilian Association of Atheists and Agnostics) made an advertising campaign in Porto Alegre to promote atheism and beyond the companies do not run ads with a signed contract, the Association of Passenger Transporters claims that advertising is illegal because it makes religious offense. But a former Muslim has been victim of an attempted murder within Brazil, where Muslims are not 1% and link Islam to suicide bombers and women stoners is prejudice.

  18. A child of some countries can learn to hate or feel superior to whom it is of a certain ethnic group or any other country or religion before learning to read, but the internet he or she will access when grow have to be blocked at the national level for he or she not see a breast on display or something that does not comply with government or with his or her religion nor when is over 18 years.

  19. Homosexuality is sexual orientation, sex outside marriage is immoral.

  20. A girl who only comes out with miscreants and outcasts have the right to fuck with whoever she want, but can make an anonymous call to Guardian Council to denunciate the mother who received a male friend at home.

  21. A woman can call us bitches or whores, but we can not call her sexually repressed lesbian.


  22. What is no good and is old is tradition, what is no good and is new is innovation.

  23. This country (Brazil) has freedom of expression and respect for differences, but those who read this text, did not like and can not respond now will say it is atheist (atheism is equal to the worst of all bad), macho, misogynist, homophobic, racist, elitist, anti-family, antiold, immoral, ...

mercredi 30 mars 2011

Desvergüenza del Año Nuevo 2010 a 2011

Ce résumé n'est pas disponible. Veuillez cliquer ici pour afficher l'article.

Shamelessness of the New Year 2010 to 2011

Non-Brazilian readers: the account made here is not typical in Brazil, even the author are like the typical Brazilian women. Please read the text "The Brazilian woman is a huge pent-up" before reading this text, if you did not read it before.
Eso texto en español (con fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Para Hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas): Desvergüenza del Año Nuevo 2010 a 2011 , http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2011/03/desverguenza-del-ano-nuevo-2010-2011.html
This text in English (with sex pics and movies, at A Vez das Mulheres at Thumblogger): Shamelessness of the New Year 2010 to 2011, http://avezdasmulheres.thumblogger.com/home/log/2011/11/shamelessness-of-the-new-y.html
Texto original em português (com fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam): Sem-vergonhices do Ano Novo de 2010 pra 2011 , http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2011/01/sem-vergonhices-do-ano-novo-de-2010-pra.html
The photos and films of the party I can not show. If it were only the bitchness I would not bother, but there were married men that their wives could not know they still talk to me, there were other friends of mine who had been there in secret, and this business of naughty videos when fall into the erroneous hands give troubles, and I want to preserve my friends.
The party was well planned, with selected guests, all friends of mine and only friends of mine knew (before). The guests were only men of quality (it's not because they were involved in high shamelessness they ceased to be men of character) and righteous women (who do not steal, do not give blows,...). And who knows me knew that it would have indecency, so some friends were afraid to go. My boss did not go, he is very good, he is good-looking, he knows my shameless, is my fan and of A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade, but is very afraid of his wife (who hates A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade and does not know the author works for her husband). My father was also invited, but he thought the lust would happen and did not have courage. Proof that there was nothing inappropriate for minors is that the ones who were there liked it so much, hehehehe.
But let's talk about the party. The party was the 30th at night (6 pm to 10 pm), 31th to 1st and 1st. Because there were people who were going to travel or spend the year with their bored family and could not get out. Some friends, as I said, came hiddenly (of his parents or his wife). It was in my house in the middle of the field (I left the city just to avoid neighbors bothering because of who comes, or a nail I hammer in the wall). I have reached the goal of 2 men for every woman, and it was difficult. Call male friends, not so much, but the call female friends was what tipped. Because in a party full of sex, almost no woman has the courage to go (with men of quality, mostly poor, because in a funk party full of thugs, night clubs with drunkers and party in a playboy's home, women go and exit with a cad, or have sex with him right there). So, some girls had come from another city. Some friends who are prostitutes (they are friends, not colleagues of profession, I am not and never was a prostitute). But I got: 28 men and 14 women (including me and two beautiful boys who live with me). There were barbecuemen (and barbecuewoman, because Abigail also knows how to do barbecue), there were porters (only to control the entry, ward off unwanted, these stuffs), there was a guitarist, but everyone enjoyed the party, and fucked. Because the staff rotated, there was always one I exiting from fun for another enters.
Entering the house, the guest saw who was there naked, so we always put one of the friends at the entrance. In this passing of years rained, but inside the house was warmer.
Some good things in the party:
01 - We had chocolate syrup and strawberry syrup. Served for the men in our pussies and for the women in the cocks of the boys.
02 - A friend brought his computer so we can see some movies. And then he brought some porno movies recorded on the computer. There was one with midgets, there was one with a good-looking granny, there was one with a very sexy girl (words of the boys) with two at same time, etc.
03 - Oh, talking about movies, that movie of the funk party I've already put in the blog A Vez dos Homens que Prestam our friend also played.
04 - A friend saw the movie of the sexy girl (words of the boys) with two at same time and took our friend of the computer and another one to do the same. It was her first time (with two) and she liked it. Because beyond the boys were good, they already had experience with share a woman (with me).
05 - A friend saw another movie, of a woman with three, and, as she is playful, decided to do the same. Everything went well too, because beyond the boys were good, they already had experience with me. We were surprised because she said it was her first time (with three), and she is a prostitute.
06 - That friend who had sex with two is going to 17 years old, she saw the other with three and said that before the age of 18 she will do the same.
07 - Abigail did something she had tried before and had not been successful: having sex with four men at same time. One in the pussy, one in the ass, sucking one and masturbating one. This time it went well. So who was fucking stopped their fuck and stayed looking at us. But, people, Abigail is not so depraved, nymphomaniac, this fuck with 4 men at once was a big joke.
But the good things in the party were not just sex:
08 - Some friends at the party were not acquaintances before, they became known of by anothers, they talked a lot. Not only men knew women. I hope there is not some marriage, because I love to undo (the unlucky ones), not to do.
09 - A friend brought War for us to play, Abigail played a little.
10 - A friend of ours, also anarchist, talked with me about some texts in Coletivo de Estudos Anarquistas Domingos Passos. Frankly, I judge these anarchist pages a little weak. So we got to chat. Who did not know what was the anarchy learned by who knows, this was very good.
11 - We commented on the latest news, as the possession of the lamp post in the presidency (the president of Brazil, Dilma Rousseff).
Some people spent less than an hour (because they came in secret), but earned at least some barbecue, syrup (that way I spoke) and a little fuck. All they liked. After a few days, I found my three married men friends and they beyond praising the party again, because they already praised it there, they said they armed themselves with courage, and have begun to take steps to divorce their wives. They said their wives are unfriendly, consume their time and money, they do not say anything nice, and are so much bad in sex, when they do not go for months without having sex with them (and I know it's true because they are optimal and I know the daughters of the mother), and they were with them more to prevent separation (the process). And then, they say they will divorce and fuck the pension (their words), because they are bored and the straw that broke the camel's back was having to have such a good time with nice people (not just sex, not only with the women) hidden of the cows.
Ah, a detail. Nobody drank. I organized the party and alcohol was banned. It had lemongrass tea, lemonade (lemon grass and lemon were from the site), soda, chocolate. It had no alcohol, no drugs, no fight, the music was not high, the guests were just very good people, to be a family party failed only not to have sex, hehehehe.
Abigail Pereira Aranha
In some city in Minas Gerais, Brazil. This account was written in Portuguese on 01/07/2011.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

AddThis