I due femminismi

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Katia Abreu o José Serra: chi è il machilista di questa storia?

Solo coloro che vedono problemi nel termine "civetta" si sentirebbero offese per essere state chiamate così

Da: Leandro Narloch il 11/12/2015 alle 13:24

Le femministe hanno sostenuto la reazione della ministra Katia Abreu, che ha lanciato il vino al senatore José Serra dopo che l'ha chiamato "civetta". La ministra stessa ha detto alla stampa che Serra era "arrogante e machilista".

Io non sono d'accordo. Se c'era il maschilismo, era da parte di Katia Abreu.

Serra usava il termine cercando di rilassarsi, senza pensare che avrebbe offeso il suo collega. Converge, quindi, con l'opinione delle femministe, per le quali non c'è alcun problema nell'essere "civetta", per usare il termine più dolce. Uno striscione delle femministe di oggi, come quelle che partecipano alla Slut Walk, è proprio quello di convincerci che non dovrebbero esserci pregiudizi contro queste donne.

Se Katia Abreu è stata offesa con un termine innocente come "civetta" (innocente e persino un po' devoto, che una nonna userebbe per parlare della sua nipotina), è perché vede in esso un significato negativo. Questo è machismo, signora ministra! Per difendere davvero le donne, Katia Abreu avrebbe dovuto rispondere "non mi sono mai visto così, ma grazie". O, ancora meglio, "sono, sì, molto orgogliosa".

@lnarloch

http://veja.abril.com.br/blog/cacador-de-mitos/feminismo/katia-abreu-ou-jose-serra-quem-e-o-machista-dessa-historia

I due femminismi

Avevo già in mente di scrivere quello che sto per dire quando leggo questo testo, che è più illustrativo che l'autore ha percepito.

Considerando il Femminismo come la collocazione della convenienza femminile come misura del giusto e del sbagliato per tutta la vita sociale, abbiamo due femminismi: il Femminismo conservatore e il Femminismo lesbo-socialista.

Fino all'epoca della Rivoluzione Industriale o molto più tardi nelle aree rurali dei paesi occidentali, le donne erano generalmente puritane perché esso era utile per loro. Nessuna donna vorrebbe avere un infortunio sul lavoro o una malattia professionale, e questa non era una rarità nella vita lavorativa del mondo sviluppato o in via di sviluppo nella metà del ventesimo secolo. Quanto valorizza per una donna avere un uomo per correre questi rischi per lei così da poter mettere almeno del cibo sul tavolo? Con quale potere questa donna accetterà a suo marito con urla e schiaffi se lui torna a casa più tardi, dopo che è stato con un amico o con un'altra donna con la quale ha già un altro figlio? E fino a qualche decennio fa, era troppo pericoloso per una donna essere una prostituta o avere una vita sessuale varia perché le piaceva, anche nei paesi sviluppati. Pericoloso a causa del rischio di gravidanze e malattie veneree, e pericoloso perché le malattie veneree erano molto più difficili da curare (come lo erano le malattie in generale). Preservativi simili a quelli di oggi esistevano addirittura dal sedicesimo secolo, come quello creato dal dr. Gabrielle Fallopio, ma erano molto meno disponibili, e persino proibiti in alcuni luoghi, come la Francia e gli Stati Uniti. Oltre ad essere molto meno comodi, però, se io fossi un uomo, preferirei un preservativo scomodo a una malattia. Anche se la donna non voleva una vita di licenziosità, quanto era VANTAGGIOSO per lei mostrare al suo futuro marito che lei sarebbe stata la donna di un solo uomo?

Questo è stato il Femminismo conservatore. Chi dice, per esempio, che a una donna è stato proibito di lavorare fuori casa, da un genitore o da un marito che l'ha sostenuta, inizia sbagliato confrontando la vita domestica dell'epoca con l'ufficio di una grande città del XXI secolo. Il femminismo lesbo-socialista appariva e cresceva solo dove sembrava più conveniente alla donna che una famiglia tradizionale.

Il punto principale in comune dei due femminismi è la combinazione del disprezzo per l'eterosessualità maschile con l'odio contro le donne che la soddisfano anche con un'eccitazione visiva. Prima della cosiddetta Rivoluzione Sessuale, che ho chiamato Rivoluzione Femdom, le giovani donne che uscivano dalla loro casa per divertimento erano accompagnate da fratelli maschi; se una donna veniva avvicinata da un uomo, quest'uomo poteva essere trattato brutalmente da lei stessa, da suo marito o da un uomo della sua famiglia che era vicino; se lei rispondeva con simpatia, veniva chiamata "per divertimento" da altre donne; un uomo che serenava una donna poteva essere sgradito dal suo padre illetterato illecito; un ragazzo non poteva avvicinarsi alla sua ragazza fino al matrimonio, a volte non riusciva nemmeno a conoscerla; e quando un ragazzo riuscì a deflorare una ragazza, di solito era minacciato dalla morte dai fratelli maschi e dal padre della ragazza di sposarla. Anche dopo quell'epoca, la prostituzione e la pornografia, oltre ad essere ricercate e difficilmente trovate quasi solo da uomini, oltre ad essere criminalizzate, hanno ricevuto uno sguardo storto sia dalle donne conservatrici sia dalle donne femministe di sinistra. Dove erano le donne che volevano avere una vita sessuale e sono state represse? Bene!, maledicendo il machismo e difendendo la criminalizzazione del sesso etero e il genocidio degli uomini.

Oh, e una donna non spaventa un uomo perché è sposata, lei lo fa perché è maleducata e nevrotica, infatti. L'atteggiamento di questa donna sotto la giustificazione di essere sposata è la stessa di quello di una giovane femminista sotto la giustificazione del maschilismo. La signora femminista conservatrice vede una donna che è simpatica agli uomini, o realmente sessualmente disponibile, come "per divertimento"; la donna femminista di sinistra vede questa donna come un oggetto.

La Slut Walk, tra l'altro, è stata la celebrazione dell'odio contro le critiche alla donna mediocre. Pochissime donne partecipanti avevano almeno una faccia di che lasciavano che un uomo si avvicinasse a loro e fuggisse intero. Un'attitudine amichevole agli uomini potrebbe compensare la parte di che non ci sono state così tante donne partecipanti che potrebbero persino essere fisicamente interessati agli uomini. Per coloro che non hanno ancora capito che la Slut Walk NON É MAI STATA apologia della promiscuità: 1) gli uomini partecipanti avevano un livello di mascolinità molto basso, è più facile che uno di loro abbia scopato uno degli altri rispetto ad alcune delle ragazze; 2) quasi tutti i riferimenti al sesso etero erano legati allo stupro o alle molestie sessuali.

Non è gratis che i due femminismi vivessero insieme relativamente bene durante la Prima Ondata e la Seconda Ondata del Femminismo. Le donne potevano scegliere la militanza di sinistra o essere casalinghe tradizionali. Gli uomini generalmente ammiravano un gruppo o l'altro, quindi o erano femministi anticristiani socialisti, o erano femministi cristiani conservatori. Solo quando le donne femministe socialiste avevano già una potenza sufficiente per attaccare le femministe conservatrici, un anti-femminismo che attaccò un vero Femminismo sorse, non uno spaventapasseri fatto da donne di campagna che si era reso colpevole di far tutte le donne giovani scopare con tutti gli uomini.

La fine dei femminismi inizierà solo quando la convenienza della donna mediocre e sessofobica cessa di essere lo standard di chi afferma di essere anti-femminista. Una donna ha abbandonato i femminismi quando lei sente uno scherzo sessuale senza sentirsi degradata o offesa. Una donna ha abbandonato i femminismi quando lei non trova scomodo un uomo che guarda sessualmente una donna, e si rende anche conto che un uomo che pensa al sesso eterosessuale con lei non la rende un oggetto, dal momento che lei non è una lesbica con un'antipatia di cazzo. Ho già detto e ripeto: la differenza tra uomo e donna è sessuale, altre qualità noi abbiamo o smettiamo di avere come individui. Lunga vita alla licenziosità!

	Questo testo in italiano senza film di dissolutezza in Men of Worth Newspaper: "I due femminismi", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/12/i-due-femminismi.html
	Questo testo in italiano con film di dissolutezza in Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "I due femminismi", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/12/i-due-femminismi.html
	Ce texte en français sans vidéos de libertinage au Men of Worth Newspaper: "Les deux féminismes", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/12/les-deux-feminismes.html
	Ce texte en français avec vidéos de libertinage au Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Les deux féminismes", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/12/les-deux-feminismes.html
	Eso texto en español sin videos de putaría en Men of Worth Newspaper: "Los dos feminismos", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/12/los-dos-feminismos.html
	Eso texto en español con videos de putaría en Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Los dos feminismos", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/12/los-dos-feminismos.html
	This text in English without licentiousness videos at Men of Worth Newspaper: "The two feminisms", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/12/the-two-feminisms.html
	This text in English with licentiousness videos at Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "The two feminisms", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-two-feminisms.html
	Texto original em português sem vídeos de putaria no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade: "Os dois feminismos", http://avezdasmulheres.over-blog.com/2015/12/os-dois-feminismos.html
	Texto original em português com vídeos de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam: "Os dois feminismos", https://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2015/12/os-dois-feminismos.html

Les deux féminismes

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Katia Abreu ou José Serra: qui est le macho de cette histoire?

Seuls ceux qui voient des problèmes dans le terme "charmeuse" s'offusqueraient d'être appelés ainsi

Par: Leandro Narloch le 11/12/2015 à 13:24

Les féministes ont soutenu la réaction de la ministre Katia Abreu, qui a lancé du vin sur le sénateur José Serra après qu'il l'a qualifiée de "charmeuse". La ministre elle-même a déclaré à la presse que Serra était "arrogante et machiste".

Je ne suis pas d'accord. S'il y avait du machisme, c'était de la part de Katia Abreu.

Serra a utilisé le terme essayant de se détendre, sans penser qu'il offenserait son collègue. Il converge donc avec l'opinion des féministes, pour qui il n'y a pas de problème à être "charmeuse", pour utiliser le terme plus doux. Une bannière des féministes d'aujourd'hui, telles que celles qui participent à Slut Walk, est précisément de nous convaincre qu'il ne devrait y avoir aucun préjugé contre de telles femmes.

Si Katia Abreu a été offensée par un terme aussi innocent que "charmeuse" (innocent et même un peu carole, qu'une grand-mère utiliserait pour parler de sa petite-fille), c'est parce qu'elle y voit un sens négatif. C'est machisme, madame ministre! Pour vraiment défendre les femmes, Katia Abreu aurait dû répondre "je ne me suis jamais vue de cette façon, mais merci". Ou, encore mieux, "je suis, oui, très fièrement".

@lnarloch

http://veja.abril.com.br/blog/cacador-de-mitos/feminismo/katia-abreu-ou-jose-serra-quem-e-o-machista-dessa-historia

Les deux féminismes

J'avais déjà à l'esprit d'écrire ce que je vais dire quand je lirai ce texte, qui est plus illustratif que celui que l'auteur a perçu.

En considérant le Féminisme comme le placement de la convenance féminine comme mesure du bien et du mal pour toute la vie sociale, nous avons deux féminismes: le Féminisme conservateur et le Féminisme lesbien-socialiste.

Jusqu'à l'époque de la Révolution Industrielle ou beaucoup plus tard dans les zones rurales des pays occidentaux, les femmes étaient généralement puritaines parce que ça leur étaient utiles. Aucune femme ne voudrait avoir un accident du travail ou une maladie professionnelle, et ce n'était pas rare dans la vie de travail des pays développés ou en développement au milieu du XXe siècle. Combien vaut-il pour une femme d'avoir un homme qui coure ces risques pour pouvoir au moins mettre de la nourriture sur la table? Avec quel pouvoir cette femme recevra-t-elle son mari avec des cris et des gifles s'il rentre chez lui plus tard, après avoir été avec un ami ou avec une autre femme avec laquelle il a déjà un autre enfant? Et il y a quelques décennies encore, il était trop dangereux pour une femme de se prostituer ou d'avoir une vie sexuelle variée parce qu'elle l'aime bien, même dans les pays développés. Dangereux en raison du risque de grossesse et de maladies vénériennes, et dangereux parce que les maladies vénériennes étaient beaucoup plus difficiles à guérir (comme les maladies en général). Les préservatifs similaires à ceux d'aujourd'hui existent même depuis le XVIe siècle, à l'instar de celui créé par le dr. Gabrielle Fallopio (il était un homme), mais ils étaient beaucoup moins disponibles, et étaient même interdits à certains endroits, comme la France et les États-Unis. En plus d'être beaucoup moins à l'aise, cependant, si j'étais un homme, je préférerais un préservatif inconfortable à une maladie. Même si la femme ne voulait pas mener une vie de libertinage, à quel point était AVANTAGEUX de montrer à son futur mari qu'elle serait une femme d'un seul homme?

C'était le Féminisme conservateur. Qui dit, par exemple, qu'une femme s'est vue interdire de travailler en dehors du foyer, par un parent ou un mari qui la soutenait, commence mal en comparant la vie domestique de l'époque au bureau d'une grande ville du XXIe siècle. Le féminisme lesbo-socialiste n'est apparu et n'a grandi que là où il semblait plus pratique pour la femme qu'une famille traditionnelle.

Le principal point commun des deux féminismes est la combinaison du mépris pour l'hétérosexualité masculine avec la haine contre les femmes qui le satisfont même avec un enthousiasme visuel. Avant la prétendue Révolution Sexuelle, que j'appelais Révolution Femdom, les jeunes femmes qui sortent de chez elles pour s'amuser étaient généralement accompagnées de frères hommes; si une femme était approchée par un homme, cet homme pouvait être traité brutalement par elle-même, par son mari ou par un homme de sa famille qui était proche; si elle a répondu avec sympathie, elle a été appelée "pour le plaisir" par autres femmes; un homme qui a sérénité une femme pourrait être malvenu par son père illettré mal résolu; un garçon ne pouvait pas approcher sa propre petite amie avant le mariage, parfois il ne pouvait même pas la connaître; et lorsqu'un garçon parvint à déflorer une fille, il était menacé de mort par les frères et le père de la fille pour l'épouser. Même après cette époque, la prostitution et la pornographie, en plus d'être recherchées et difficilement retrouvées presque seulement par hommes, en plus d'être criminalisées, ont reçu un regard courbé à la fois de la part des dames conservatrices et des féministes de gauche. Où étaient les femmes qui voulaient avoir une vie sexuelle et ont été réprimées? Eh bien!, en maudissant le machisme et en défendant la criminalisation du sexe hétérosexuel et le génocide des hommes.

Oh, et une femme ne fait pas peur à un homme parce qu'elle est mariée, elle le fait parce qu'elle est impolie et névrotique, en fait. L'attitude de cette femme sous la justification du mariage est la même que celle d'une jeune féministe sous la justification du machisme. La femme féministe conservatrice considère une femme sympathique envers les hommes, ou réellement disponible sexuellement, comme "pour le plaisir"; la femme féministe de gauche voit cette femme comme un objet.

Le Slut Walk, incidemment, était la célébration de la haine contre les critiques envers la femme médiocre. Très peu de femmes participantes avaient au moins un visage de qui laissait un homme les approcher et s'enfuir entier. Une attitude favorable aux hommes pourrait compenser la partie de qu'il n'y avait pas beaucoup de femmes participantes qui pourraient même amener les hommes à être physiquement intéressés. Pour ceux qui n'ont pas encore compris que Slut Walk N'ÉTAIT JAMAIS une apologie de la promiscuité: 1) les hommes participant avaient un niveau de masculinité très bas, il est plus facile pour l'un d'entre eux d'avoir baisé l'un des autres que certaines des filles; 2) presque toutes les références au sexe hétérosexuel étaient liées au viol ou au harcèlement sexuel.

Ce n'est pas gratuitement que les deux féminismes ont relativement bien cohabité pendant la Première Vague et la Deuxième Vague du Féminisme. Les femmes pouvaient choisir le militantisme de gauche ou être des ménagères traditionnelles. Les hommes généralement admiraient un groupe ou l'autre, donc soit ils étaient féministes anti-chrétiens socialistes ou féministes chrétiens conservateurs. Ce n'est que lorsque les femmes féministes socialistes ont déjà assez de pouvoir pour attaquer les femmes féministes conservatrices qu'un antiféminisme qui attaque un vrai Féminisme est apparu, et non un épouvantail fabriqué par des paysannes qui était coupable de faire toutes les jeunes femmes à baiser avec tous les hommes.

La fin des féminismes ne commencera que lorsque la commodité de la femme médiocre et sexephobique cessera d'être le standard de quiconque se prétend anti-féministe. Une femme a abandonné les féminismes lorsqu'elle entend une blague sexuelle sans se sentir dégradée ou offensée. Une femme a abandonné les féminismes quand elle ne trouve pas inconfortable un homme qui regarde une femme sexuellement, et se rend compte également qu'un homme qui pense au sexe hétérosexuel avec elle ne fait pas d'elle un objet, puisqu'elle n'est pas lesbienne avec une aversion pour coq. Je l'ai déjà dit et je le répète: la différence entre un homme et une femme est sexuelle, autres qualités nous avons ou nous cessons d'avoir en tant qu'individus. Vive la licence!

	Questo testo in italiano senza film di dissolutezza in Men of Worth Newspaper: "I due femminismi", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/12/i-due-femminismi.html
	Questo testo in italiano con film di dissolutezza in Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "I due femminismi", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/12/i-due-femminismi.html
	Ce texte en français sans vidéos de libertinage au Men of Worth Newspaper: "Les deux féminismes", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/12/les-deux-feminismes.html
	Ce texte en français avec vidéos de libertinage au Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Les deux féminismes", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/12/les-deux-feminismes.html
	Eso texto en español sin videos de putaría en Men of Worth Newspaper: "Los dos feminismos", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/12/los-dos-feminismos.html
	Eso texto en español con videos de putaría en Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Los dos feminismos", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/12/los-dos-feminismos.html
	This text in English without licentiousness videos at Men of Worth Newspaper: "The two feminisms", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/12/the-two-feminisms.html
	This text in English with licentiousness videos at Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "The two feminisms", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-two-feminisms.html
	Texto original em português sem vídeos de putaria no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade: "Os dois feminismos", http://avezdasmulheres.over-blog.com/2015/12/os-dois-feminismos.html
	Texto original em português com vídeos de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam: "Os dois feminismos", https://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2015/12/os-dois-feminismos.html

Los dos feminismos

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Katia Abreu o José Serra: ¿quién es el machista de esta historia?

Sólo aquellas que ven problemas en el término "coqueta" se sentirían ofendidas al ser llamadas así

Por: Leandro Narloch 11/12/2015 a las 13:24

Las feministas apoyaron la reacción de la ministra Katia Abreu, quien le arrojó vino al senador José Serra después de que él la llamara "coqueta". La propia ministra le dijo a la prensa que Serra era "arrogante y machista".

Estoy en desacuerdo. Si hubo machismo, fue por parte de Katia Abreu.

Serra usó el término tratando de relajarse, sin pensar que ofendería a su colega. Por lo tanto, converge con la opinión de las feministas, para las cuales no hay ningún problema en ser "coqueta", para usar el término más dulce. Una pancarta de las feministas de hoy, como las que participan en Slut Walk, es precisamente para convencernos de que no debería haber prejuicios contra esas mujeres.

Si Katia Abreu se ofendió con un término tan inocente como "coqueta" (inocente y hasta algo caroleño, que una abuela usaría para hablar sobre su nieta), es porque ve un significado negativo en eso. ¡Esto es machismo, señora ministra! Para defender realmente a las mujeres, Katia Abreu debería haber contestado: "nunca me vi así, pero gracias". O, mejor aún, "yo soy, sí, con mucho orgullo".

@lnarloch

http://veja.abril.com.br/blog/cacador-de-mitos/feminismo/katia-abreu-ou-jose-serra-quem-e-o-machista-dessa-historia

Los dos feminismos

Ya tenía en mente escribir lo que voy a decir cuando leí este texto, que es más ilustrativo de lo que el autor percibió.

Si consideramos el Feminismo como la ubicación de la conveniencia femenina como la medida del bien y el mal en toda la vida social, tenemos dos feminismos: el Feminismo conservador y el Feminismo lésbico-socialista.

Hasta la época de la Revolución Industrial o mucho más tarde en las zonas rurales de los países occidentales, las mujeres eran generalmente puritanas porque les era útil. A ninguna mujer le gustaría tener un accidente laboral o una enfermedad ocupacional, y esto no era una rareza en la vida laboral del mundo desarrollado o en desarrollo a mediados del siglo XX. ¿Cuánto valora para una mujer tener un hombre que corra esos riesgos por ella para que al menos pueda poner comida en la mesa? ¿Con qué poder esta mujer recibirá a su esposo con gritos y bofetadas si él llega a casa más tarde, después de haber estado con un amigo o con otra mujer con la que ya tiene otro hijo? Y hasta hace unas décadas, era demasiado peligroso para una mujer ser una prostituta o tener una vida sexual variada porque le gusta, incluso en los países desarrollados. Peligroso debido al riesgo de embarazo y enfermedades venéreas, y peligroso porque las enfermedades venéreas eran mucho más difíciles de curar (como lo eran las enfermedades en general). Los preservativos similares a los de hoy existen incluso desde el siglo XVI, como el creado por el dr. Gabrielle Fallopio (era hombre), pero eran mucho menos disponibles, e incluso estaban prohibidos en algunos lugares, como Francia y los Estados Unidos. Sin embargo, además de ser mucho menos cómodos, aunque, si yo fuera hombre, preferiría un condón incómodo a una enfermedad. Incluso si la mujer no quisiera una vida de libertinaje, ¿cuánto era VENTAJOSO a ella demostrarle a su futuro marido que ella sería mujer de un solo hombre?

Este fue el Feminismo conservador. Quien dice, por ejemplo, a una mujer le fue prohibido trabajar fuera del hogar, por un padre o esposo que la apoyó, comienza mal al comparar la vida doméstica de la época con la oficina de una gran ciudad del siglo XXI. El feminismo lesbo-socialista solo apareció y creció donde parecía más conveniente para la mujer que una familia tradicional.

El punto principal en común de los dos feminismos es la combinación de desprecio por la heterosexualidad masculina con el odio contra las mujeres que la satisfacen incluso con una excitación visual. Antes de la llamada Revolución Sexual, a la que ya llamé Revolución Femdom, las mujeres jóvenes que salían de su casa por diversión solían estar acompañadas por hermanos varones; si un hombre se acercaba a una mujer, este hombre podía ser tratado de manera ruda por ella misma, por su marido o por un hombre de su familia que estaba cerca; si ella respondía con simpatía, otras mujeres la llamaban "para diversión"; un hombre que le ponía una serenata a una mujer podía ser mal recibido por su padre analfabeto mal resuelto; un niño no podía acercarse a su propia novia hasta la boda, a veces ni siquiera podía conocerla; y cuando un niño lograba desflorar a una niña, los hermanos y el padre de la niña solían amenazarlo con la muerte para casarse con ella. Incluso después de esa época, la prostitución y la pornografía, además de ser buscadas y apenas encontradas casi solo por hombres, además de que fueron criminalizadas, recibieron una mirada torcida tanto por las mujeres conservadoras como por las mujeres feministas izquierdistas. ¿Dónde estaban las mujeres que querían tener una vida sexual y fueron reprimidas? ¡Bien!, maldiciendo el machismo y defendiendo la criminalización del sexo hetero y el genocidio de los hombres.

Ah, y una mujer no asusta a un hombre porque es casada, ella lo hace porque es ruda y neurótica, de hecho. La actitud de esta mujer bajo la justificación de estar casada es la misma que la de una joven feminista bajo la justificación del machismo. La dama feminista conservadora ve a una mujer simpatica con los hombres, o realmente disponible sexualmente, como "para diversión"; la mujer feminista de izquierda ve a esta mujer como un objeto.

La Slut Walk, por cierto, fue la celebración del odio contra las críticas hacia la mujer mediocre. Muy pocas mujeres participantes tenían al menos una cara de la que permitían que un hombre se les acercara y escapara entero. Una actitud amigable con el hombre podría compensar la parte de que no había tantas mujeres participantes que pudieran incluso hacer que los hombres se interesaran físicamente. Para aquellos que aún no han entendido que Slut Walk NUNCA FUE una apología de la promiscuidad: 1) los hombres participantes tenían un nivel de masculinidad muy bajo, es más fácil que uno de ellos haya follado a uno de los otros que a alguna de las chicas; 2) casi todas las referencias al sexo hetero estaban relacionadas con la violación o el acoso sexual.

No es gratis que los dos feminismos convivieran relativamente bien durante la Primera Ola y la Segunda Ola del Feminismo. Las mujeres podían elegir la militancia de izquierda o ser amas de casa tradicionales. Los hombres generalmente admiraban a uno grupo u otro, por lo tanto, o eran feministas anti-cristianos socialistas, o eran feministas cristianos conservadores. Solo cuando las mujeres feministas socialistas ya tenían suficiente poder para atacar a las mujeres feministas conservadoras surgió un antifeminismo que atacó a un Feminismo real, no un espantapájaros hecho por campesinas que era culpable de hacer que todas las mujeres jóvenes jodan con todos los hombres.

El fin de los feminismos solo comenzará cuando la conveniencia de la mujer mediocre y sexofóbica deje de ser la norma de quienquiera que diga ser anti-feminista. Una mujer ha abandonado los feminismos cuando ella escucha una broma sexual sin sentirse degradada u ofendida. Una mujer ha abandonado los feminismos cuando no encuentra incómodo un hombre que mira a una mujer sexualmente, y también se da cuenta de que un hombre que piensa en el sexo heterosexual con ella no la convierte en un objeto, ya que ella no es una lesbiana con un disgusto a la polla. Ya lo he dicho y lo repito: la diferencia entre hombre y mujer es sexual, otras cualidades, nosotros las tenemos o dejamos de tenerlas como individuos. ¡Viva el libertinaje!

	Questo testo in italiano senza film di dissolutezza in Men of Worth Newspaper: "I due femminismi", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/12/i-due-femminismi.html
	Questo testo in italiano con film di dissolutezza in Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "I due femminismi", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/12/i-due-femminismi.html
	Ce texte en français sans vidéos de libertinage au Men of Worth Newspaper: "Les deux féminismes", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/12/les-deux-feminismes.html
	Ce texte en français avec vidéos de libertinage au Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Les deux féminismes", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/12/les-deux-feminismes.html
	Eso texto en español sin videos de putaría en Men of Worth Newspaper: "Los dos feminismos", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/12/los-dos-feminismos.html
	Eso texto en español con videos de putaría en Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Los dos feminismos", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/12/los-dos-feminismos.html
	This text in English without licentiousness videos at Men of Worth Newspaper: "The two feminisms", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/12/the-two-feminisms.html
	This text in English with licentiousness videos at Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "The two feminisms", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-two-feminisms.html
	Texto original em português sem vídeos de putaria no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade: "Os dois feminismos", http://avezdasmulheres.over-blog.com/2015/12/os-dois-feminismos.html
	Texto original em português com vídeos de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam: "Os dois feminismos", https://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2015/12/os-dois-feminismos.html

The two feminisms

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Katia Abreu or José Serra: who is the macho of this story?

Only those who see problems in the term "flirt" would fell offended in being called so

By: Leandro Narloch 12/11/2015 at 13:24

Feminists supported the reaction of the minister Katia Abreu, who threw wine at Senator José Serra after he called her a "flirt". The minister herself told to the press that Serra was "arrogant and macho".

I disagree. If there was machismo, it was on the part of Katia Abreu.

Serra used the term trying to relax, without thinking he would offend his colleague. It converges, therefore, with the opinion of the feminists, for whom there is not no problem in being "flirt", to use the sweeter term. A banner of today's feminists, such as those participating in the Slut Walk, is precisely to convince us that there should be no prejudice against such women.

If Katia Abreu was offended with a term as innocent as "flirt" (innocent and even somewhat carole, which a grandmother would use to talk about her granddaughter), it is because she sees a negative meaning in it. This is machismo, Madam Minister! In order to really defend women, Katia Abreu should have replied "I never saw myself like this, but thank you". Or, even better, "I am, yes, very proudly".

@lnarloch

http://veja.abril.com.br/blog/cacador-de-mitos/feminismo/katia-abreu-ou-jose-serra-quem-e-o-machista-dessa-historia

The two feminisms

I already had in mind writing what I am going to say when I read this text, which is more illustrative than the author perceived.

Considering Feminism as the placement of feminine convenience as the measure of right and wrong for all social life, we have two feminisms: the Conservative Feminism and the Lesbian-Socialist Feminism.

Until the epoch of the Industrial Revolution or much later in the rural areas of Western countries, women were generally Puritan because it was useful to them. No one woman would like to have a labour accident or an occupational disease, and this was no rarity in the labour life of the developed or developing world in the mid-twentieth century. How much does it value for a woman to have a man to run those risks for her so he can at least put food on the table? With what power will this woman wellcome her husband with screamings and slaps if he comes home later, after he was with a friend or with another woman with whom he already has another child? And until a few decades ago, it was too dangerous for a woman to be a prostitute or to have a varied sex life because she likes it, even in developed countries. Dangerous due to the risk of pregnancy and venereal diseases, and dangerous because venereal diseases were much more difficult to be cured (as diseases in general were). Condoms similar to those of today even existed since the sixteenth century, like the one created by dr. Gabrielle Fallopio (he was male), but they were much less available, and were even prohibited in some places, like France and the United States. In addition to being much less comfortable, though, if I was a man, I would prefer an uncomfortable condom to an illness. Even if the woman did not want a life of wantonness, how much was it ADVANTAGEOUS for her to show her future husband that she would be an one only man's woman?

This was the Conservative Feminism. Who says, for example, that a woman was prohibited from working outside the home, by a parent or husband who supported her, starts out wrong by comparing the domestic life of the epoch with the office of a big city of the 21st century. Lesbo-socialist Feminism only appeared and grew where it seemed more convenient to the woman than a traditional family.

The main point in common of the two feminisms is the combination of contempt for male heterosexuality with the hatred against women who satisfy it even with a visual excitement. Before the so-called Sexual Revolution, which I called Femdom Revolution, young women who went out their house for fun used to be accompanied by male brothers; if a woman was approached by a man, this man could be treated rudely by herself, by her husband, or by a man of her family who was near; if she responded sympathetically, she was called "for fun" by other women; a man who serenaded a woman could be unwelcome by her ill-resolved illiterate father; a boy could not approach his own girlfriend until the wedding, sometimes he could not even know her; and when a boy achieved to deflower a girl, he used to be threatened with death by girl's brothers and father to marry her. Even after that epoch, prostitution and pornography, in addition to being sought after and hardly find almost only by men, besides they were criminalized, they received a crooked look by both the conservative ladies and the leftist feminist ladies. Where were the women who wanted to have a sex life and were repressed? Well!, cursing machismo and defending the criminalization of straight sex and the genocide of men.

Oh, and a woman does not frighten a man away because she's married, she does it because she's rude and neurotic, in fact. The attitude of this woman under the justification of being married is the same as the one of a young feminist under the justification of machismo. The conservative feminist lady sees a woman who is sympathetic to men, or really sexually available, as "for fun"; the leftist feminist woman sees this woman as an object.

Slut Walk, incidentally, was the celebration of the hatred against the criticism towards the mediocre woman. Very few participating women had at least one face of that they let a man approach them and escape whole. A man-friendly attitude could compensate for the part that there were not so many participating women who could even lead men to be physically interested. For those who have not yet understood that the Slut Walk WAS NEVER an apology for promiscuity: 1) the men participating had a very low level of masculinity, it is easier one of them to have fucked one of the others than some of the girls; 2) nearly all reference to straight sex was related to rape or sexual harassment.

It is not for free that the two feminisms lived together relatively well during the First Wave and the Second Wave of Feminism. Women could choose leftist militancy or being traditional housewives. Men generally admired one group or the other, thus either they were socialist anti-Christian feminists, or they were conservative Christian feminists. Only when socialist feminist women had already power enough to attack conservative feminist women an antifeminism that attacked a real Feminism arose, not a scarecrow made by countrywomen that was guilty of causing all young women to fuck with all men.

The end of the feminisms will only begin when the convenience of the mediocre and sexphobic woman ceases to be the standard of whoever claims to be anti-feminist. A woman has abandoned the feminisms when she hears a sexual joke without feeling degraded or offended. A woman has abandoned the feminisms when she does not find uncomfortable a man who looks at a woman sexually, and she also realizes that a man who thinks about heterosexual sex with her does not make her an object, since she is not a lesbian with a cock dislike. I have already said and I repeat: the difference between man and woman is sexual, other qualities, we have or we cease to have as individuals. Long live the licentiousness!

	Questo testo in italiano senza film di dissolutezza in Men of Worth Newspaper: "I due femminismi", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/12/i-due-femminismi.html
	Questo testo in italiano con film di dissolutezza in Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "I due femminismi", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/12/i-due-femminismi.html
	Ce texte en français sans vidéos de libertinage au Men of Worth Newspaper: "Les deux féminismes", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/12/les-deux-feminismes.html
	Ce texte en français avec vidéos de libertinage au Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Les deux féminismes", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/12/les-deux-feminismes.html
	Eso texto en español sin videos de putaría en Men of Worth Newspaper: "Los dos feminismos", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/12/los-dos-feminismos.html
	Eso texto en español con videos de putaría en Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Los dos feminismos", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/12/los-dos-feminismos.html
	This text in English without licentiousness videos at Men of Worth Newspaper: "The two feminisms", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/12/the-two-feminisms.html
	This text in English with licentiousness videos at Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "The two feminisms", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-two-feminisms.html
	Texto original em português sem vídeos de putaria no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade: "Os dois feminismos", http://avezdasmulheres.over-blog.com/2015/12/os-dois-feminismos.html
	Texto original em português com vídeos de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam: "Os dois feminismos", https://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2015/12/os-dois-feminismos.html

Socialism, Capitalism and Christianity together, why not? - part 2

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Brazil has never had more than 15% of non-Christians. But "we" gave the Socialist Lula the third largest votes number in the human history for his second mandate in the year following to the publication, in the major newspapers of the country, of the discovery of the "Mensalão" (Big Monthly), a scheme to buy votes of congressmen who should be the opposition to approve actions of his government. Members, allies and admirers of PT (Workers Party) attacked the opponents on behalf of the social programs inherited from their predecessor as Bolsa Familia (Family Grant) and the University for All Program (ProUni), that PT government presented as if they were by it and as if they were threatened if the PT was ousted.

And I would point out the quota system in universities in the PT government: it introduces mediocre students at the university just for being black or for coming from public school. The quota system is not only to dishonest black people and mediocre students from public school, is also a pleasure and a hope for the bourgeois whites who defend the system, because it is a social elevation not only DESPITE the lack of merit and character, also BECAUSE OF it.

It is no coincidence that the approval of the PT government had been more than 60% when there was the "Big Monthly", but there was a growth of the Family Grant program, of the financing programs that gave assistance to the quota beneficiaries, of the public service, of the police stations that are exclusive for women invent whatever they want against ex-husbands and other men; but it was the rejection that surpassed 60% when came budgets cuts in social programs, layoffs of civil servants and private companies coming to shrink or to close due to the downturn in the economy. It is not a coincidence, too, that when everything was "good", not only universities were increasingly similar to the intractable, intellectually disqualified and sexually unhappy provincials of the small cities almost entirely Catholic in the 60s, they themselves also were getting increasingly closer (through their children and grandchildren) of those same universities.

Any anti-socialist (and Socialism includes Lesbo-feminism) who has a blog works on it on his / her own PC, or at Internet cafes, or (like me) using friends' computers. Even the anti-leftist without writings by his / her own needs to hide from family or co-workers his / her Facebook profile (fortunately, it is not my case). These can confirm: that portion quoted in the Communist Manifesto nearly 90% of the population who had no private property could not do that revolution, unless if someone with power used him on their behalf. The Communist Manifesto itself let it escape: Socialism is not possible without a huge financial support from the capitalists and a great popular enthusiasm.

The Catholic Church was to Christianism what the Soviet Union was to Marxism. Catholic countries of the Middle-Modern Age and even small towns mostly Catholic until recently were hellish for non-Catholic smart people, who suffered from an irritating atmosphere of glorification of the illiteracy to individual physical risks. When a leftist responds to a criticism of Socialism with a comparison with the Catholic Church, he is not only making an attempt to self-projection. He also knows what he's talking about.

One thing that Karl Marx was right: the capital has individuality and autonomy and the proletarian not. In fact, he himself was a son of capitalists, he let it escape here. Another thing he was right: when anti-communists defend the freedom, they think only (almost always) in freedom to the capitalists. Today, the libertarians curse the labor laws as State meddling in the companies, but they are omitted when an employee is fired because a sensual photo of her OUTSIDE of her workplace is circulating on social networks. They curse the minimum wage, but they do not think it's an aggression against freedom the ban on prostitution or, in some countries, the blockade against pornography on the internet. Christian rightists offer as an alternative to an oppressive control by State over the population an oppressive control by the bosses over their employees, who are almost all the population.

We have to remember a trait that lesbian feminists have in common with the conservative women who say themselves anti-feminists: they believe that the dignity of a woman decreases as she has sex with typical men, with the number of men and with the quality of sex that she offers; or to the extent as she is pleasant to men, especially visually, but also in sympathy. If the chaste woman uses a discreet clothing, it is not because she values herself, it is because she despises the (hetero)sexuality of men and she shows it DENYING them a small glimpse of her woman's body. If the woman with a Feminist trend uses a provocative clothing, it's not because she is less frigid than the chaste woman, it is because she despises the (hetero)sexuality of men and she shows it SHOWING them a small glimpse of her woman's body. Even among porn former actresses, former prostitutes and women who were sex symbols, the almost universal rule is to hide the past or to tell it as if satisfying the heterosexuality of the poor decent men was the most degrading thing a woman can have to do in life. We only have a pornography industry and some sensuality in conventional arts and advertising exactly because some men perceived, decades ago, that they could make lots of money with this, and because they also could pay very well women who accept to work on them. And the source of this profit expectation comes from the male heterosexuality despised by the female universe. In fact, many scenes of pornography and even advertising scenes where men and women interact well involve everyday situations, such as work or approaches in the streets, including pornographic scenes in open places (which, incidentally, are among my favorites in theory and practice). I, myself, criticize, since my adolescence, conservative women for their Puritanism and feminists women for their homosexuality. And even some readers of my Facebook profile still think that, because of what I share about male-female relationships and about my adventures with my male friends, I ought to be, to be a woman, a thinly veiled bitch, a pedantic exhibitionist or a vulgar bisexual.

Decades ago, the conservative Christian women had attacked a scarecrow Feminism that promoted feminine heterosexual liberation, exactly while the real Feminism had propositions such as classifying sex (heterosexual sex) as rape and mass genocide of men. At the same time, the two groups were together to crack down on prostitution and pornography, for this, BOTH GROUPS use the same slanders almost with the same words. When men began to avoid kindness to women for them not to be accused of "sexual harassment" and began exchanging the possibility of a conventional marriage, with lack of sex, a wife who also works and a future alimony, for masculinist communities, pornography or games, appeared the Conservative Women Against Feminism. Incidentally, the groups Mulheres Contra o Feminismo, Women Against Feminism and Donne Contro Il Femminismo are later to MY anti-feminist work IN THE SAME LANGUAGE, and also to the book "The Flipside of Feminism".

The French Revolution and the Communist Manifesto are proof that Christianity had not lasted eighteen centuries until then with peasants fighting against devoted enemies coming from all sides. Almost all libertarian arguments against Socialism, some still used today, they are eaten like hot bread by leftists at least since the Communist Manifesto, the mid-nineteenth century. The Christian right-wing only did not perish in invisibility because 1) ordinary citizens with this thought might meet in a still free internet before formally leftist governments; 2) the progressive success of socialist ideology, itself, gives leftists freedom and the power to express publicly their own folly, and the impossibility to extinguish the mental sanity by decree makes every single person who is lucid and of good character to be anti-leftist; 3) for the point I am approaching here.

As I was writing this text, I caught sight of two things that can be illustrations of everything I've said here and in the part 1.

1) Congressman Jean Wyllys, Socialism and Freedom Party, whose political success came from his participation in the program Big Brother Brasil and from being a LGBT militant gay, in discussion with congressman João Rodrigues in the House of Representatives[1]:

Decent men do not watch porn videos in full plenary session. (...)

Any television show is more decent than a congressman that, rather than honoring the vote and public money, is using a plenary session to watch porn movies.

(...) I am a declared homosexual, yes, and you get used to it.

2) A case shared in the page Família Católica (Catholic Family)[2]:

Família Católica, always taking position beside the victim regardless of race, creed or social status.

Read the narrative by Nayara and you will realize how the victim becomes guilty as interest.

Harassment not!

Do you see this blouse? That's how I was dressed for work today. And I heard that to be so with the "blouse open", a man could sit beside me, put his penis out and touch himself...

Well, it seems absurd, but that's what happened.

The clothing is a formal attire, which gives a minimum view, below the neck but above the woman's minuscule breasts. What caught my attention is that the narrative is very similar to the fictions by repulsive lesbian of sexual harassment or rape on public transport.

Anyone who thinks cliches as "leftism produces promiscuity" or "Catholicism is defense against Feminism" is UNABLE to understand what he / she saw right now.

Socialism is not a mode of production, is not a religion, it is a social, political and cultural system that attacks INDIVIDUAL FREEDOMS combining vanities of disqualified egocentric politicians and civil servants and frustration of failed and mediocre citizens. If the biggest capitalists in the world and in some countries sponsor leftist movements, they consent to the government sponsoring them with taxpayers' (and theirs) money or just bow their heads for any group of unbalanced lesbians, Capitalism does not need to finish off the Socialism nor vice versa. If the gay-lesbian movement exists only because of leftist initiative and we may have churches with a name of Christian, but allowing homosexuals as members, clerics or even founders, as the lesbian pastor Lanna Holder, Christianity can not finish off Socialism and Socialism does not need end all that has the name of Christianity.

NOTES:

[1] "Jean Wyllys está prestes a ser expulso da política", Brasil Infra, November 12, 2015, http://brasil-infra.com/2015/11/12/jean-wyllys-esta-prestes-a-ser-expulso-da-politica

[2]

Família Católica, always taking position beside the victim regardless of race, creed or social status.

Read the narrative by Nayara and you will realize how the victim becomes guilty according to the interest.

Harassment not!

Do you see this blouse? That's how I was dressed for work today. And I heard that to be so with the "blouse open", a man could sit beside me, put his penis out and touch himself...

Well, it seems absurd, but that's what happened. Today, when I caught the buses that always catch to go to work (47, Vital Brasil - Niterói downtown), a man came in, sat down beside me, and he began to move strangely, the way he moved putting his hand in his pants and positioning the backpack in order to he to stay in front of his body so no one could see what he was doing, my reaction firstly was thinking "I will be robbed", hereupon, I asked God for forgiveness, because I thought it could be prejudice of mine (I let clear that the prejudice was the way he acted, and not for his skin color), but he was keen to keep moving to get my attention, then I realized that he was with his penis out of his pants and touching himself. My reaction was to get up screaming, in a way to call for help, I did not say that word, but I wanted to draw people's attention to what was going on... I got up and went to another seat, and that guy wondered why I was screaming, after all, he was not touching me, he was only with his pants' zipper open and doing what he should do, since my blouse was open and he had not asked me to close. I cursed, I shouted, I quarreled with him. I tried to take a photo, but the nervous man did not allow me to handle the right way on my mobile. When I threatened to denounce him he just jumped out of the bus.

I asked for help to the driver, asked us to go to the police station, before that man exited. But the driver claimed he did not heard, he was paying attention to the traffic!

People in the bus looked at me like I was a crazy, until I cried "it's funny that everyone looks, but nobody does anything" and the woman who was in front of me simply replied "WHAT DID YOU WANT TO BE DONE? YOU JUST CRIED BECAUSE THE GUY WAS 'BLACK'".

Wait a moment, I cried because I am not obliged to witness such a thing. I cried because I wanted some help, because he's a pervert! I cried because regardless of skin color he could not do that!

I thought a lot before sharing it here, a lot of people telling me it solves nothing doing whatever, or report, because it will be difficult to catch who did it.

But no, I will not and I must not remain silent! I will report YES! I will go to the police station yes, I will do what I have within my reach.

Today it was me, tomorrow it can be with my niece.

I do not want this to anyone, I came to feel guilty! But I'm not, he's a sick and he needs to pay in some way for it!

Sorry for the outburst, but I could not help but share!

(Família Católica, November 08, 2015, https://www.facebook.com/FamiliaCatolicaa/posts/999831336746044, sharing the publication by Nayara Sena at https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1036519043059100&set=a.395523637158647.91041.100001030412127&type=3)

	Questo testo in italiano senza film di dissolutezza in Men of Worth Newspaper: "Socialismo, Capitalismo e Cristianesimo insieme, perché no? - parte 2", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/11/socialismo-capitalismo-e-cristianesimo-insieme-perche-no-parte-2.html
	Questo testo in italiano con film di dissolutezza in Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Socialismo, Capitalismo e Cristianesimo insieme, perché no? - parte 2", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/11/socialismo-capitalismo-e-cristianesimo_16.html
	Ce texte en français sans vidéos de libertinage au Men of Worth Newspaper: "Socialisme, Capitalisme et Christianisme ensemble, pourquoi pas? - partie 2", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/11/socialisme-capitalisme-et-christianisme-ensemble-pourquoi-pas-partie-2.html
	Ce texte en français avec vidéos de libertinage au Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Socialisme, Capitalisme et Christianisme ensemble, pourquoi pas? - partie 2", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/11/socialisme-capitalisme-et-christianisme_16.html
	Eso texto en español sin videos de putaría en Men of Worth Newspaper: "Socialismo, Capitalismo y Cristianismo juntos, ¿por qué no? - parte 2", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/11/socialismo-capitalismo-y-cristianismo-juntos-por-que-no-parte-2.html
	Eso texto en español con videos de putaría en Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Socialismo, Capitalismo y Cristianismo juntos, ¿por qué no? - parte 2", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/11/socialismo-capitalismo-y-cristianismo_16.html
	This text in English without licentiousness videos at Men of Worth Newspaper: "Socialism, Capitalism and Christianity together, why not? - part 2", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2015/11/socialism-capitalism-and-christianity-together-why-not-part-2.html
	This text in English with licentiousness videos at Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Socialism, Capitalism and Christianity together, why not? - part 2", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/11/socialism-capitalism-and-christianity_16.html
	Texto original em português sem vídeos de putaria no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade: "Socialismo, Capitalismo e Cristianismo juntos, por que não? - parte 2", http://avezdasmulheres.over-blog.com/2015/11/socialismo-capitalismo-e-cristianismo-juntos-por-que-nao-parte-2.html
	Texto original em português com vídeos de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam: "Socialismo, Capitalismo e Cristianismo juntos, por que não? - parte 2", http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2015/11/socialismo-capitalismo-e-cristianismo_16.html