What does John Doe with today's freedom and progress is his problem? What we try to do with our is solution!

Eso texto en español (sin fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Paraíso Tangible en Wordpress): ¿Qué Juan Pérez hace con la libertad y los progresos de hoy en día es su problema? Lo que intentamos hacer con nuestra es la solución!, http://avezdoshomens2.wordpress.com/2011/09/28/libertad-y-los-progresos-de-hoy/

Eso texto en español (con fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Para Hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas): ¿Qué Juan Pérez hace con la libertad y los progresos de hoy en día es su problema? Lo que intentamos hacer con nuestra es la solución!, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2011/09/que-juan-perez-hace-con-la-libertad-y.html

This text in English (without sex pics and movies, at Paraíso Concreto): What does John Doe with today's freedom and progress is his problem? What we try to do with our is solution!, http://paraisoconcreto.blogspot.com/2011/09/what-does-john-doe-with-todays-freedom.html

This text in English (with sex pics and movies, at A Vez das Mulheres do Thumblogger): What does John Doe with today's freedom and progress is his problem? What we try to do with our is solution!, http://avezdasmulheres.thumblogger.com/home/log/2011/39/what-does-john-doe-with-to.html

Texto original em português (sem fotos e vídeos de putaria, no Contra os Reis e as Religiões): O que Fulano faz com a liberdade e os progressos de hoje é problema dele? O que a gente tenta fazer com a nossa é solução!, http://semsenhores.wordpress.com/2011/06/23/liberdade-e-progressos-de-hoje/

Texto original em português (com fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam): O que Fulano faz com a liberdade e os progressos de hoje é problema dele? O que a gente tenta fazer com a nossa é solução!, http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2011/09/o-que-fulano-faz-com-liberdade-e-os.html

Abigail Pereira Aranha

SINCE EVERY TIME WE KNOCK THIS WAY SOMEONE COMES TALKING ABOUT RACISM, MACHISMO, HOMOPHOBIA, WE ARE NOT FOR NOTHING OF THIS.

Gender equality became a facade for women make a hell to her husband threatening to file a complaint and he go to jail.

Racial democracy became a facade to black people without shame in their face entering the college, the labor market and politics.

Sexual freedom became a repressed young woman wearing like a bitch or a woman who everyone thinks she is most sanctimonious go hiddenly to a sex shop to buy something to use with her husband.

Social inclusion became works in invasions in abandoned places they call neighborhoods and use misery to make a living.

And what will they do with that such freedom?

We have found virgin by choice, monogamous by choice, asexual by choice. We only do not find on the internet women who have sex without commitment by choice. And many women who defend lesbianism or the right to diversity of sexual orientation has attacked me because of my bitchness.

Afro-descendants, women, people with disabilities who have achieved a place in college, the labor market, in politics on behalf of social justice (at least most) after all will look of their own career, their own vanity and won't care to the world, will do as the evil whites did and still will call those who strive for some ideal of potheads and unoccupied.

The woman who was (still is, right?) victim of a macho society will go to the streets as a whore and a snub to the nice men to fuck with all jerks men and assholes. Or will have sex with a working man (or just a rich playboy) to get pregnant and live earning a pension.

Freedom of religion will be for people to choose the gods of the land where they live or those of other lands they did not take the mud. They will respect the atheists, so, who rapes a child, opens the mother from top to bottom with knife, diverts tax money that was to go to health is because has no God, but they respect the atheists.

And if there are cameras in the streets, scanners at airports which see you naked, internet filters, spam filters on e-mail, boyfriends and girlfriends who do not have separate profiles on social networks, so good. Those who obey the law, believe in God, does not see sex on the internet, do not cheat husband or wife, do not argue with the judge's nephew has nothing to fear, right?

Freedom of expression, opinion, religion has become freedom to be cretinous and mediocre head?

• Let's change the Slut Walk to Lust Walk (wow, in English it gets a cool play of words!). Let's change a bunch of hussies with slut clothes or topless, who live on asshole face and come out with drug dealers and still wants respect, to a big colective fuck on the street.
• Let's change the Gay Pride by being ashamed of being unable to touch or think of the opposite sex.
• Let's change marches to get works in the most horrible neighborhoods of the city by joining neighbors to them help more each other, improve the neighborhood and vote like big people in the next election.
• Let's change the strikes that stop social welfare, school of the poors and hospital of the poors for three months for the fellowship of the workers, so workers will be happier at work and face our problems instead of each one do what he or she can to harass or harm another.
• Let's defend privacy on the street, phone support, access to pornography on Internet, in our lives in general when we do not hurt anyone and do away with privacy when it comes to harm someone. Rather the contrary.
• Let's change the rallies and petitions in defense of religion and family for the defense of atheism, anarchy and give our love and presence for those who most deserve.
• Let's use email to send something worth, which deserve to be seen all over the world.
• Let's stop saying and doing whatever we want to say and do something worth, or what should be said and done.

What I defend is the dictatorship. The dictatorship of shame in the face of the person to have effort, character, education. And if the person is being impaired, or whether society has serious problems, let this person uses his or her freedom and what he or she can use to bring solutions, to his or her own life and life to the neighboor.

Oh, and many who say that defends freedom also like to censor what they dislikes.

¿Qué Juan Pérez hace con la libertad y los progresos de hoy en día es su problema? Lo que intentamos hacer con nuestra es la solución!

Ce résumé n'est pas disponible. Veuillez cliquer ici pour afficher l'article.

Razones por las que el feminismo está evolucionando hacia una ideología totalitaria que puede socavar la democracia

http://feminofascismo.blogspot.com/2011/07/razones-por-las-que-el-feminismo-esta.html

Vamos luchar contra el feminazismo

Ce résumé n'est pas disponible. Veuillez cliquer ici pour afficher l'article.

Let's fight against the feminazism

Eso texto en español (con fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Para Hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas en Blogger): Vamos luchar contra el feminazismo, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2011/07/vamos-luchar-contra-el-feminazismo.html

Eso texto en español (sin fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Paraíso Tangible en Wordpress): Vamos luchar contra el feminazismo, http://avezdoshomens2.wordpress.com/2011/07/29/vamos-luchar-contra-el-feminazismo

This text in English (with sex pics and movies, at A Vez das Mulheres at Thumblogger): Let's fight against the feminazism, http://avezdasmulheres.thumblogger.com/home/log/2011/30/lets-fight-against-the-fe.html

This text in English (without sex pics and movies, at Paraíso Concreto): Let's fight against the feminazism, http://paraisoconcreto.blogspot.com/2011/07/lets-fight-against-feminazism.html

Texto original em português (com fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam): Vamos lutar contra o feminazismo, http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2011/04/vamos-lutar-contra-o-feminazismo.html

Texto original em português (sem fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade): Vamos lutar contra o feminazismo, http://avezdasmulheres.wordpress.com/2011/04/23/vamos-lutar-contra-o-feminazismo

Abigail Pereira Aranha

1. A woman can close her face, hit, break things for anything that she does not like and does not bother to explain. But she need not worry about what she does or says to anyone that is not so stupid or overbearing like her.

2. A woman who wants to marry a man her level up respects yourself. A man who wants to marry a woman who earns more than he is a pimp.

3. If a man comes home like a wreck after a day in a horrible job, going and going back standing on a crowded bus, his wife bores him saying that he does not love her, not the value her, etc. If a woman comes home like a wreck after a day in a horrible job, going and going back standing on a crowded bus, she is tired.

4. If a woman is in PMS, let the world bend it. If a man is with stress and speaks more loudly to the woman who is annoying him, he is cashing his problems in her.

5. If a mural in a public place shows all men as aggressors, rudes, machoes, rapists, murderers, war-doers, perverted and incompetents, it's a fight in defense of women. If a man in a bar conversation says women do not respect or do not even see men of character, he is generalizing, is a get-nobody, frustrated, gay.

6. If a man writes a text "what women want" (wow, was not the woman the black of the world?), he is sensitive. If a woman writes a text "what men want", she is a mixture of submissive housewife with a bitch who takes it all.

7. If a wife asks her husband to fix the roof or to divide her tasks of house, the men are there for that. If the husband wants sex with his wife for the third or fourth time this month, he thinks women are only for sex and housework.

8. If a man says "I can not", is grudgingly. If a woman denies something, she has grounds.

9. A husband who is kind, loving, intelligent, hardworking, helpful, character and good in bed is found in any alley. A beautiful and moralist woman with one or two qualities among intelligence, simpathy, character and work is worth their weight in gold.

10. If a woman had a child before age 18, has matured early. If a man has not a son at 30, he is a brat.

11. If a woman is not married nor had children at age 25, is taking care of professional life. If a man is not married nor had children at age 25, he does not want to compromise.

12. If a man has ethics, love of neighbor and kindness and likes pornography or is an atheist, is depraved and without moral principles. If a woman is veiled, inhuman and unpleasant, but is religious and defends sex only within marriage, she is a woman of principles.

13. A woman wants her husband to remember the wedding anniversary, Valentine's Day, International Women's Day, Mother's Day. Even though she never says him something nice and she is the worst thing that happened in his life.

A woman finds unacceptable to receive something far less worse than that she thinks she have the right to do unto others.

And do not even work to make to the women parallels like these. Almost all really think that women are queens: are superior, they want to give orders and have the right to have whatever they want.

Women consider their most stupid fads (such as buying something that they never used), your PMS, your futile subjects to talk (as reality shows), their need to be pampered as a way of being that must be respected. While they have what to criticize in the hair, clothing and WAY OF BEING OF THE OTHERS.

Women are less and less concerned about being, doing or pretending anything good. Women shop assistants with a shit-face, beautiful women who do not give a smile, poor women who speak like police approaching gangster are very common. Ah, but men ... forget the men. Where are the women who are better than men in everything and will fix the world? Where are the women of the poems of International Women's Day, those who treat children with love and the others with gentleness?

The woman who opens her legs to get a job or a promotion is going into extinction. She is giving way to the woman who got his first job only for being a woman or because she had prepared while she was in college, playing clean or dirty, while male colleagues were more concerned with fucking sluts in the weekend or the moralistic girlfriend than in studying. And got the others by the experience of previous. And unless we act now, the boys can see even before old age:

1. A woman can get the best jobs simply for being women. Some jobs are offered to women today. The man who sought work knows what I'm talking about.

2. The end of heterosexual marriages. If you know any woman today married to a man who earns less than twice of her, usually is a woman with low education or who had a youth very limited. As women are increasingly gaining better, they need not be married.

3. Prostitution and pornography will be crimes and will be truly punished. If you are a male and finds it good, you'll excuse me, you have no balls nor dignity. If you are a male and respects women, ok, but if you can not imagine a male who respects a prostitute and does not consider a porn star as of less value than a "family girl", you are a scoundrel hypocrite who learned their patterns of ugly, frigid, unhappy and hypocritical women (your mother and friends). If you are male and don't know to differentiate between prostitution and pornography and sexual exploitation, you hit the play of feminazis. When women dominate the world, men will be even more despised than they already are. Mainly because these men will be concentrated in the worst and most poorly paid jobs, so prostitution and pornography will not move enough money and will close the doors.

4. Heterosexual sex will be considered rape. The working men of character already know how sex is difficult. They also see the worst trash if not fucking a lot of women, at least married. When the good man gets sex, it is with his wife, which appears after that his life is in order financially, or when she has exhausted all other options (including semi-literate thugs). When the miscreants enter into crisis and a man earn less than a woman, she will not fuck with anyone.

5. Crimes against women will no longer be treated as violence, but will be treated as insubordination. This is a longer discussion, but have you ever noticed that violence and violence against women are two different things?

Thankfully, the problem of feminarcinazism is not in women. A woman can put a man in jail for sexual harassment and say that feminists do not represent her. And they are very afraid, very suspicious and very jealous of each other to put a colleague on the boards or in politics. It was not the union of the oppressed women who gave us Dilma Rousseff as president in Brazil, because despite being slight majority of the electorate they chose José Serra (her opposite, who lose the election). Although feminists remain silent about the unbalanced lesbian colleagues, I think they don't have a secret plan style Conspiracy Theory.

The strength of the lesbian Nazism is in males. In the poems to International Women's Day, those who speak of perfect women that do not exist in the real world, I do not know one of an author who identifies oneself which author is not a male. Are the men who after a lifetime fighting to have something finance credit card or the formation of the first bitch who give them attention. Are the men who find themselves blessed and forced to give their best when after 30 years, and put in order their lives financially honestly, find a bitch that went hand in hand (of miscreants and outcasts) in youth and is now thirty-odd years, in an evangelical church and giving them some attention. Are the men who think they've found a true woman when they find a goody frigid and narrow that behaves like a goody frigid and narrow, and find themselves blessed and forced to give their best in exchange for a dull life and a mediocre sex. A prominent woman almost always has a man behind (sometimes in the front). And most importantly: are the men who do not feel as men if do not have a wife and a child to support with what they accumulated in his whole life.

So, here's a strategy to combat lesbian narcinazism. It may seem silly, but if half the men do will ever do much good.

1. If men are pussy-slaves, the problem is ours, not theirs alone. Because what I say about women a few years ago is something that any wise man over 30 years have already seen and more something, but usually this man is already married or is separated and with a son. Then this man has already begun to pay for their mistakes. And what's worse is that some creditors are women. And look, I that am a woman also am going to benefit in the struggle against lesbian Nazism, because so-called feminism and machismo fight in the first true women.

2. Respect women, but don't feminist. Be prepared to find a woman who deserves your respect, but mainly to avoid wasting kindness and solidarity with those who deserve a beating.

3. When a man on your side see a chick in short clothes and say "that sexy woman", give him a stiff. If women think (they sure) that with a body more or less, a pretty face and a provocative clothing they will be valued for that reason alone, if men overvalue women just because they're hot, women will never mature and men will spend the best of their lives with them.

4. Do not marry, unless open marriage. Sex is a weapon and a commodity for women. In a conventional marriage with a woman, you do not have a woman only for you, you have the only woman available to you. And monopoly never is good. If a woman has to offer a man something beyond the only socially accepted opportunity for him to fuck someone, she will have no problem with open marriage. You have sex with another woman and she with another man neither mean you love each other less, nor will end your relationship.

5. Defend prostitution and pornography. If you can, sign a paid porn site, to this business to continue making a profit. And forget talk of unsightly lesbo-nazi-puritanical that prostitution and pornography harm the woman. They use the disgusting tactic of mixing trafficking of women and sexual slavery with prostitution and pornography. And they believe that "heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies" (this phrase was said by a feminist and no woman has called about). Moreover, they step on the man as one step on a paper lying on the floor.

6. Viva male comradeship. Replace the conversations on MSN with little women assholes that will not get anything and the weekend nights in places where it's easier you to leave with a hematoma than with a woman by the investment in friendship with men of character, kind and intelligent. Enter the "Campaign To Make A Kindness To A Male".

The oppression of men over women never existed, what existed was a world where was not easy for women to be single. And if the lesbo-nazi-moralism is deployed, some men will find that the world has always been dominated by women. It is likely that the SCUM Manifesto end showing itself as a psychopath lesbian delusion, because men are who to this day delivered the women to pay for their own vices and rascality (why no feminist seems to know of the existence of the SCUM Manifesto?). But even if the lesbonazist ideal goes to the hole, the men will go ahead if they do not act.

Related words: Internacional Women's Day, machismo, fighting against prejudice, feminism, femism, feminazism, women's rights, violence against males, beauty, fashion, women's place is at kitchen, female vanity, women's hipocrisy, ruler women, women winning their place in society, oral, anal, oral sex, cunnilingus, pussylicking, felatio

El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - parte 5: por que los hombres "defienden" a sus mujeres

Eso texto en español (con fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Para Hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas en Blogger): El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - parte 5: por que los hombres "defienden" a sus mujeres, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2011/06/el-machismo-fue-creado-por-las-mujeres.html

Eso texto en español (sin fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Paraíso Tangible en Wordpress): El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - parte 5: por que los hombres "defienden" a sus mujeres, http://avezdoshomens2.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/el-machismo-fue-creado-por-las-mujeres-parte-5/

This text in English (with sex pics and movies, at A Vez das Mulheres at Thumblogger): Machismo was created by women - part 5: why men "defend" their women, http://avezdasmulheres.thumblogger.com/home/log/2011/25/machismo-was-created-by-wo.html

This text in English (without sex pics and movies, at Paraíso Concreto): Machismo was created by women - part 5: why men "defend" their women, http://paraisoconcreto.blogspot.com/2011/06/machismo-was-created-by-women-part-5.html

Texto original em português (com fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam): O machismo foi criado pelas mulheres - parte 5: por que os homens "defendem" suas mulheres, http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2011/06/o-machismo-foi-criado-pelas-mulheres.html

Texto original em português (sem fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade): O machismo foi criado pelas mulheres - parte 5: por que os homens "defendem" suas mulheres, http://avezdasmulheres.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/o-machismo-foi-criado-pelas-mulheres-parte-5/

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Conocemos hombres que vigilan a sus novias, sus esposas, sus hermanas, sus madres. Que prohíben a sus mujeres a estar en la calle hasta tarde, trabajar fuera de casa, estudiar en el colegio, ir al chat, tener un perfil de red social. Halagan a los móviles, leen correos electrónicos, ahuyentan a los amigos varones y algunas amigas mujeres de ella, llaman varias veces al día preguntando dónde está y qué está haciendo. Todavía ellos pueden decir "tengo que proteger lo que es mío". En el pasado, algunos reyes tenían muchas mujeres y pusieron eunucos para vigilarlas. El tutor era eunuco exactamente para no disfrutar de la variedad. ¿Tiene sentido decir que estos hombres prendían a sus mujeres porque juzgaban que ellas son sus propiedades? Lo hace. Pero hay otra explicación que se puede hacer aún más sentido.

Oh, voy más allá y responder a dos preguntas más que mucha gente piensa que tiene las respuestas. ¿Por qué los hombres escapaban de morir por adulterio? ¿Y por qué los violadores incluso en la cárcel tienen que estar separados de los otros presos?

Imagine un cerdo capitalista, o un dueño de esclavos muy malo. ¿Una persona así puede tener un socio, un compañero para alguno interese de los dos? Puede. Supongamos, Onofre y Arístides son dueños de esclavos abominables, evasores de impuestos, deshonestos, que maltratan a sus esclavos extremadamente, y ellos tienen un negocio en común. ¿Onofre puede prestar algunos esclavos a Arístides? Él puede, ¿no? ¿Onofre puede prestar algunas máquinas a Arístides, o incluso ambos pueden conseguir algunas máquinas juntos? Pueden, ¿no? ¿Onofre y Arístides pueden utilizar la misma propiedad? Pueden, ¿no?

¿Y si Onofre sorprender a su esposa, su hija, su hermana o incluso a su amante en la cama con Arístides? ¿O no fue ni en la cama, pero sentada en el sofá en la casa de la Arístides?

Ahora, vamos a considerar dos buenas personas capitalistas, porque no todos los capitalistas son hijos del Diablo. Pedro y Reginaldo son amables, generosos incluyendo con sus empleados, honestos, y más allá de capitalistas son también mucho amigos con un negocio en común. ¿Pedro puede prestar algunos empleados a Reginaldo? Él puede, ¿no? ¿Pedro puede prestar algunas máquinas a Reginaldo, o incluso ambos pueden conseguir algunas máquinas juntos? Pueden, ¿no? ¿Pedro y Reginaldo pueden utilizar la misma propiedad? Pueden, ¿no?

¿Y si Pedro sorprender a su esposa, su hija o su hermana en la cama con Reginaldo?

Pedro va a quedarse por lo menos molesto con Reginaldo. Pero Onofre va a querer matar a Arístides.

¡Espera un poco! Si las mujeres son propiedades de los hombres y ellos comparten varias propiedades, ¿por qué exactamente estas ellos no comparten?

Y por el contrario, que los hombres son propiedad de mujeres, tiene más sentido? ¿Las mujeres, por ejemplo, dividen los hombres? Vamos a ver:

1. Pesquisa muestra que las mujeres juzgan los hombres más interesantes cuando saben que ellos son casados.


2. En el pasado, una mujer era engañada por su marido, ella lo sabía, pero mantuvo el matrimonio. La gente de más edad recuerda. Es sólo hoy en día que la mujer pone fin a un noviazgo o un matrimonio cuando ella descubre que su hombre tiene mucho contacto con otra mujer.


3. ¿Una mujer que sale con un hombre bellaco y mujeriego piensa que ello está solo con ella? Difícilmente.

¿Y cuando usted escuchó a una mujer se quejar de que su novio o esposo es celoso? A veces. ¿Pero cuando usted escuchó a una mujer se quejar que no puede tener relaciones sexuales con un hombre guapísimo, consultar los sitios de malicia, mirar un hombre sexy por el novio o el marido celoso? Nunca. Un hombre viendo una mujer más presentable en las calles y se lamentando a otro hombre porque él es casado usted hay visto.

¿Has oído hablar de una mujer que rompe con su familia, rompe con su lugar de origen, enfrenta al mundo, los arriesga incluso su vida para casarse con un hombre de otra raza, otra religión, incluso un sinvergüenza como los demás, no? ¿Por qué es sólo para dejar a un marido que golpea, que viola, que humilla para ser más feliz solo o con un buen hombre que existe la cultura, la dependencia económica, lo tener que tener a un hombre, etc?

¿Usted entiende a dónde quiero llegar? Si es tan malo para una mujer utilizar el apellido del marido cuando se casa, no salir a la calle solo, usar ropa larga, volver a casa temprano, no trabajar fuera de su casa, no hablar con los hombres, etc, ¿por qué es sólo con los peores trastes que esta mujer no habla de la libertad, y con frecuencia se siente aún amada, protegida? Cuando en un folletín una mujer está en un matrimonio horrible y tiene relación con otro hombre que la trata bien mejor, sigue siendo que es la televisión que tiene pacto con el Diablo haciendo una campaña para destruir a la familia. Mujer sólo engaña o tiene sexo sin compromiso para hacer carrera o tomar venganza de sus padres o esposo. O cuando se encuentra con un bellaco y quedase mojada.

¿Y por qué el adulterio, que no es más que un hombre disfrutar de la mujer de otro, era castigado con la muerte, e incluso en Brasil también fue un delito hasta menos de 10 años? Incluso sin problemas de la cárcel o la muerte, incluso la amistad de décadas entre dos hombres termina sólo porque uno anduvo con la esposa o la amante de otro. Si en lugar de ser la esposa fuera el coche que uno tiene y el otro usó sin que lo otro supiese no haría esta confusión.

Y si los hombres veían a las mujeres como objetos, ¿por qué la violación ha sido siempre un crimen, antes castigada con la muerte? ¿Parece una pregunta tonta? No es así, voy a explicar por qué.

En el Antiguo Testamento, una persona podía entrar a la plantación de otra para comer (Deuteronomio 23: 24, 25), algo que si usted lo hace en el Brasil del siglo 21, dependiendo de quién es el propietario, le golpearán con una cachiporra. Aún en el Antiguo Testamento, cuando se cosecha y una espiga caiga en tierra, tenía que estar allí para que los pobres vienen tomar (Deuteronomio 24: 19 a 21). Aún en el Antiguo Testamento, el ladrón no era castigado con la muerte, él tuvo que devolver el robado con adiciones, y si él trataba de robar en la noche y fuera muerto, el que lo mató era condenado. Mira:

1 Cuando alguno hurtare buey ú oveja, y le degollare ó vendiere, por aquel buey pagará cinco bueyes, y por aquella oveja cuatro ovejas.

2 Si el ladrón fuere hallado forzando una casa, y fuere herido y muriere, el que le hirió no será culpado de su muerte.

3 Si el sol hubiere sobre él salido, el matador será reo de homicidio: el ladrón habrá de restituir cumplidamente; si no tuviere, será vendido por su hurto.

4 Si fuere hallado con el hurto en la mano, sea buey ó asno ú oveja vivos, pagará el duplo.

7 Cuando alguno diere á su prójimo plata ó alhajas á guardar, y fuere hurtado de la casa de aquel hombre, si el ladrón se hallare, pagará el doble.

8 Si el ladrón no se hallare, entonces el dueño de la casa será presentado á los jueces, para ver si ha metido su mano en la hacienda de su prójimo.

Éxodo 22: 1 a 4, 7, 8

¿Por qué si era con una mujer la tolerancia era tan más baja?

¿Cuántas veces usted ha visto a un hombre celoso queriendo "defender" a su mujer y usted dijo o vio a un hombre decir que ella no es su propiedad? Y desas veces, ¿cuántas veces la mujer apoyó quien lo dijo? ¿O cuántas veces la propia mujer fue la primera en decir que no es su propiedad?

¿Cuántas veces un hombre quiere empezar una conversación con una mujer sola, o incluso demorase más en mirarla, y la propia mujer, dice que ella está comprometida para ahuyentar el hombre?

Volviendo a las dos preguntas que me comprometió a responder antes y después llegaré a la conclusión:

¿Por qué los hombres escapaban de morir por adulterio?

La complicidad de los hombres? Bueno. Incluso hoy en día un hombre puede poner fin a una amistad con otro porque quedó locamente enamorado de una perra cualquiera. Y incluso hoy en día hay hombres que sorprenden sus esposas con otro hombre y son los primeros a querer por lo menos golpearlo con una cachiporra. El control social del patriarcado sobre la sexualidad de las mujeres? ¿Quién está realmente interesado en una sociedad en la que el sexo sólo puede ocurrir dentro del matrimonio, o incluso el contacto de un hombre y una mujer mal ocurre sólo dentro de la familia? Lindo, voy a dar la respuesta y si usted pensó dentro de la propaganda feminista, no quiero que parezca que estoy te llamando estúpido. Un grupo de hombres casados con mujeres feas, analfabetas, aburridas y reprimidas sexualmente descubre que una mujer hizo sexo fuera del matrimonio, o con un hombre casado, y ellos se juntarán para matar a esta señora? Usted mismo, está viviendo en un lugar tosco y está en un matrimonio insoportable y usted sabe que una mujer está cometiendo adulterio, usted querrá la muerte de la mujer o su número de teléfono? Así que, para responder a la pregunta: los hombres siempre han sido los proveedores, entonces matar a un hombre por adulterio era un tiro en el pie. La lapidación por adulterio existe (por desgracia, aún hoy en día) para las mujeres controlaren unos a otras. Por cierto, ¿has visto a una mujer fea que es el amante?

Los hombres son entrenados por las mujeres como pitbulls para ayudar a sus mujeres a permanecer lejos de los hombres. Luego, con un gran costo que un hombre puede ver la pierna de una mujer desnuda, ver a un coño, encontrar a una prostituta, o incluso hablar con una mujer que no es de su familia o su esposa. Los hombres no protegen a sus mujeres, son las mujeres que se mantienen alejadas de los hombres con la ayuda de los hombres machistas que han sido educados por ellas con el fin de dominar y controlar los hombres.

¿Y por qué los violadores incluso en la cárcel tienen que estar separados de los otros presos?

¿Has entendido ahora? Los niños, educados en el machismo creado por mujeres, tales como pitbulls entrenados, creen que un hombre coger a una mujer contra su voluntad es peor que matar y descuartizar. Conclusión: lesbonazismo siempre ha existido, lo que está terminando no es el patriarcado, es aquello mundo que es muy malo para que las mujeres posan rechazar los hombres.

La serie "El machismo fue creado por las mujeres" en español

Machismo was created by women - part 5: why men "defend" their women

Eso texto en español (con fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Para Hombres de Calidad y Mujeres Verdaderas en Blogger): El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - parte 5: por que los hombres "defienden" a sus mujeres, http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2011/06/el-machismo-fue-creado-por-las-mujeres.html

Eso texto en español (sin fotos e peliculas de putaría, en lo Paraíso Tangible en Wordpress): El machismo fue creado por las mujeres - parte 5: por que los hombres "defienden" a sus mujeres, http://avezdoshomens2.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/el-machismo-fue-creado-por-las-mujeres-parte-5/

This text in English (with sex pics and movies, at A Vez das Mulheres at Thumblogger): Machismo was created by women - part 5: why men "defend" their women, http://avezdasmulheres.thumblogger.com/home/log/2011/25/machismo-was-created-by-wo.html

This text in English (without sex pics and movies, at Paraíso Concreto): Machismo was created by women - part 5: why men "defend" their women, http://paraisoconcreto.blogspot.com/2011/06/machismo-was-created-by-women-part-5.html

Texto original em português (com fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam): O machismo foi criado pelas mulheres - parte 5: por que os homens "defendem" suas mulheres, http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2011/06/o-machismo-foi-criado-pelas-mulheres.html

Texto original em português (sem fotos e vídeos de putaria, no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade): O machismo foi criado pelas mulheres - parte 5: por que os homens "defendem" suas mulheres, http://avezdasmulheres.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/o-machismo-foi-criado-pelas-mulheres-parte-5/

Abigail Pereira Aranha

We know men who surveil their girlfriends, their wives, their sisters, their mothers. They forbid their women to stay out late, working out of home, study in the college, going into chat, to have social networking profile. Flatter the mobile, read emails, chase away male friends and some female friends of hers, call several times a day wondering where she is and what she is doing. They can still say "I have to protect what is mine". In the past, some kings had many women and put eunuchs to guard them. The guardian was eunuch just to not enjoy the variety. Does it makes sense to say that these men hold their women because they feel that they are their properties? Does. But there is another explanation that can make even more sense.

Oh, I'll further answer two more questions that lot of people think they have the answers. Why do men escaped to die for adultery? And why rapists even in jail have to be segregated from other prisoners?

Imagine a capitalist pig, or a slave master very ordinary. A person like this can have a partner, a companion for any interest of the two? Can. Let's suppose, Onofre and Aristides are abominable slave owners, tax evaders, dishonests, that mistreat extremely their slaves, and they have a business in common. Onofre can lend some slaves to Aristides? He can, right? Onofre can lend some machines to Aristides, or even both can get some machines together? They can, right? Onofre and Aristides can use the same property? They can, right?

And what if Onofre catches his wife, his daughter, his sister or even his lover in bed with Aristides? Or it was neither in bed, but sitting on the sofa in the Aristides' house?

Now, let's take two capitalist good people, because not every capitalist is son of the Devil. Peter and Reginald are friendly, generous including with their employees, honest, and more than capitalists they are also friends with a great deal in common. Peter can lend some employees to Reginald? He can, right? Peter can lend some machines to Reginald, or even both can get some machines together? They can, right? Peter and Reginald can use the same property? They can, right?

And if Peter catches his wife, his daughter, or his sister in bed with Reginald?

Peter will be at least upset with Reginald. But Onofre will want to kill Aristides.

Wait a minute! If women are properties of men and they share many properties, why just these they do not share?

And the opposite, that men are properties of women, it makes more sense? Do women, for example, divide men? Let's see:

1. Research shows that women find men more interesting when they know that they are married.
2. In the past, a woman was cheated by her husband, she knew, but kept the marriage. The older people remember. It is today that the woman ends a dating or a marriage when she discovers that her man has many contact with another woman.
3. A woman who goes out with a man who is scroundel and flirts another women thinks he is alone with her? Hardly.

And when you heard a woman complain that her boyfriend or husband is jealous? Sometimes. But when you heard a woman complain she can't have sex with a gorgeous man, see naughtiness sites, looking for a nice man because of the jealous boyfriend or husband? Never. A man seeing a woman more presentable on the streets and lamenting to another man because he's married you've ever seen.

Have you heard of a woman who breaks with her family, breaks with her place of origin, faces the world, risks even her life to marry a man of another race, another religion, even a rascal like others, is not it? Why is it just to leave a husband who hits, who rape, who humiliates to be happier alone or with a nice man that there is culture, economic dependency, having to have a man, etc.?

Do you understood where I want to get? If it's all that bad for a woman to use the husband's surname when she get married, do not go out on the street alone, wear long clothes, back home early, do not work out her home, do not talk to men, etc., why is it just with the worst frets that this woman does not speak about freedom, and often still feels loved, protected? When in a soap-opera a woman is in a horrible marriage and has affair with another man that is better, it's still the television which has pact with the Devil campaigning to destroy the family. Woman only cheats or have sex without commitment to get ahead or take revenge of her parents or husband. Or when meets a bastard and gets wet.

And why the adultery, which is nothing more than a man enjoying another's wife, was punished with death, and even in Brazil was also a crime until less than 10 years ago? Even without problems in prison or death, even friendship of decades between two men ends up just because one went around with the wife or the mistress of another. If instead of being the wife was the car which one has and the other wore without the other know won't make this turmoil.

And if men saw women as objects, why rape has always been crime, formerly punished with death? It seems a silly question? It is not, I'll explain why.

In the Old Testament, a person could enter the planted ground of another to eat (Deuteronomy 23: 24, 25), something that if you do in Brazil of the 21th century, depending on who is the owner, you'll be clubbed. Still in the Old Testament, when it was harvest and a ear fell on ground, it had to stay there for the poor to come and gather (Deuteronomy 24: 19 to 21). Still in the Old Testament, the thief was not punished with death, he had to return the stolen with additions, and if he tried to steal in the night and was dead, the one who killed him was convicted. Look:

1 If a man shall steal an ox, or a sheep, and kill it, or sell it; he shall restore five oxen for an ox, and four sheep for a sheep.

2 If a thief be found breaking up, and be smitten that he die, [there shall] no blood [be shed] for him.

3 If the sun be risen upon him, [there shall be] blood [shed] for him; [for] he should make full restitution; if he have nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft.

4 If the theft be certainly found in his hand alive, whether it be ox, or ass, or sheep; he shall restore double.

7 If a man shall deliver unto his neighbour money or stuff to keep, and it be stolen out of the man's house; if the thief be found, let him pay double.

8 If the thief be not found, then the master of the house shall be brought unto the judges, [to see] whether he have put his hand unto his neighbour's goods.

Exodus 22: 1 to 4, 7, 8

Why if it was with women the tolerance was so lower?

How many times have you seen a jealous man wanting to "defend" his woman and you said or saw a man say that she is not his property? And those times, how many times the woman supported who said it? Or how many times the woman herself was the first to say she is not his property?

How many times a man wants to start a conversation with a woman alone, or even look at her more time, and the woman herself says she is committed to scare away the man?

Returning to the two questions that I promised to answer in the back and then I will conclude:

Why do men escaped to die for adultery?

Complicity of men? Okay. Even today a man can end a friendship with other because he was madly in love with some bitch. And today there are men who catch with their wifes with another man and are the first to want to at least club him. Social control of patriarchy on women's sexuality? Who is really interested in a society in which sex can only happen within marriage, or even the touch of a man and a woman badly happens only within family Cute, I will give the answer and if you thought within the feminist propaganda, I do not look like I am calling you stupid. A bunch of married men with ugly, illiterate, boring and sexually repressed women discovers that a woman slept outside marriage, or with a married man, and they will join to kill this lady? You yourself, are living in an ordinary place and is in a unbearable marriage and you know that a woman is commiting adultery, you'll want the death of the woman or her phone number? So, to answer the question: men have always been providers, then kill a man for adultery was a shot in the foot. The stoning for adultery exists (unfortunately, even today) for women to control each other. By the way, have you seen an ugly woman that is lover?

Men are trained by the women like pitbulls to help their women to stay away from men. Then, at great cost a man might see a bare woman's leg, see a pussy, find a prostitute, or even talk to a woman who is not of his family or wife. Men do not protect their women, are the women who stay away from men with the help of macho men who were educated by them in order to dominate and control men.

And why rapists even in jail have to be segregated from other prisoners?

Got it now? The boys, educated in the machismo created by women, such as pitbulls trained, find that a man fuck a woman against her will is worse than killing and dismembering. Conclusion: lesbonazism has always existed, which is ending is not the patriarchy, is that world too bad for the women to be able to reject men.

The serie "Machismo was created by women" in English (on Paraíso Concreto)

Fighting discrimination is a thing of lesbians and queers, let's respect only who and what deserves it

Abigail Pereira Aranha

1. Karl Marx was a white and European man, and thought the world with no divisions in countries, without religions and without exploitation of man by man. Mikhail Bakunin, anarchist thinker, too. But we can find the world more fair because only a poor black girl is in college because of the quota system (note: in Brazil, colleges and universities have quota systems benefiting black people and former public school students).

2. No one was born yesterday to have what to hear from an intelligent person, but any woman who has reached age 60 without having read a book or had an orgasm has a lot to teach.

3. A moody young man, with a horrible childhood, full of bitterness and mother since the age of 15 have early maturity. A young man with a critical sense who knows how the world might be better has not woken up to life.

4. Mastercard and Visa are still accepting donations for the Klu Klux Klan and the Swiss banks deny access to data on financial transactions of people involved in drug, women or weapons trafficking or terrorism. But MasterCard and Visa decided to terminate their partnership with the WikiLeaks, and Swiss bank where Julian Assange had an account decided to block it because WikiLeaks has published secret documents from the Pentagon and a bunch more that has much to hide. (See, in Portuguese, "O povo contra Julian A.", by Walter Hupsel)

5. "If a woman has a job where only men work she is pioneering, if a man has a job where only women work he's queer; a man who hits a woman is coward, a woman who hits a man is brave (not that I support a man hits a woman, it never); a betrayed woman is a victim, a betrayed man is a cheated." (Émerson, commentary on text "O mito do poder masculino" (The myth of male power) , published in Paraíso Concreto)

6. "When a black man uses the '100% black with pride' shirt, a historical reading of the sentence translates: 'I belong to an ethnic group that was oppressed throughout history, but I'm proud of it and grieve for her to have the same rights the other'. When a white man uses the '100% white, with pride' shirt, a historical reading of the sentence translates: 'I'm racist'". (Túlio Vianna , professor of criminal law at UFMG - Federal University in Minas Gerais)

7. "When gay people make their 'Gay Pride Parade', they manifest themselves for respect to their sexual orientation. When heterosexuals people make a 'Heterosexual Pride Parade' they express their intolerance for diverse sexual orientations." (same Túlio Vianna)

8. "When a woman is beaten by her husband, she is beaten by from centuries of subjugation of women to men. When a husband is beaten by his wife, he is simply a coward." (again, Túlio Vianna)

9. Someone can exalt women and cite 10 women who made something important to the world. Before anyone cites 20 men who made something in the same areas, will be called a macho or will hear the victimist lesbian speech.

10. Before anyone cites 10 names of white scientists and thinkers, will hear that blacks raised Brazil with their slave labor.

11. When two non-white people stuck in time and in life make war against each other, it is ethnic conflict. When whites come and kill some hundreds of them (with bad intentions, it is true), it is genocide.

12. Any culture without written language should be preserved. Just for not being white.

13. Africa has always been a horrible continent full of ignorant people dominated by scavengers from them ourselves, but African slaves built Brazil. America was populated by Indians who believed in Astrology, but they teach us to care for nature. Europeans arrived in the two continents and put them into the civilized world, but they were the bad guys who killed people and cultures.

14. Who ever heard at least one of the expressions take the hand of the nose and raise your hand:

    - Women will and should dominate the world because then everything will be better world

    - A woman has personality traits higher and more moral than men

    - Fathers are good for nothing

    - Men should not be more like women because they are superior emotionally

    - The world's tragedies and wars are faults of crude personality traits man. Women give more peace to the world and fewer crises, the world would be a better place for everyone.

    Now imagine the following scene: I come here and say, "Well people I think the world should be dominated by whites. Because whites are emotionally superior to blacks and have higher traces of organization. Notice Africa. Africa is a shit because it is dominated by blacks. Let the whites dominate and then the world will have more peace and less tribal wars". Well, if I wrote it on my blog seriously, the other day the Federal Police would enter in my house, eat all my Doritos, delete my porn movies and put me in the Suburban beating in my head with their shit rifles.

    (Sílvio Koerich)

15. Religions and religious divisions have made their adherents hate, deny rights, assault and kill ones the adherents of others. But a ruthless criminal has not God in the heart.

16. 
    

    An atheist may find it absurd a woman to be killed accused of sex outside of marriage in the twenty-first century in an Islamic country. But one person is better just because have a religion and our laws are based on the Ten Commandments.

17. The ATEA (Brazilian Association of Atheists and Agnostics) made an advertising campaign in Porto Alegre to promote atheism and beyond the companies do not run ads with a signed contract, the Association of Passenger Transporters claims that advertising is illegal because it makes religious offense. But a former Muslim has been victim of an attempted murder within Brazil, where Muslims are not 1% and link Islam to suicide bombers and women stoners is prejudice.

18. A child of some countries can learn to hate or feel superior to whom it is of a certain ethnic group or any other country or religion before learning to read, but the internet he or she will access when grow have to be blocked at the national level for he or she not see a breast on display or something that does not comply with government or with his or her religion nor when is over 18 years.

19. Homosexuality is sexual orientation, sex outside marriage is immoral.

20. A girl who only comes out with miscreants and outcasts have the right to fuck with whoever she want, but can make an anonymous call to Guardian Council to denunciate the mother who received a male friend at home.

21. A woman can call us bitches or whores, but we can not call her sexually repressed lesbian.

22. 
    

    What is no good and is old is tradition, what is no good and is new is innovation.

23. This country (Brazil) has freedom of expression and respect for differences, but those who read this text, did not like and can not respond now will say it is atheist (atheism is equal to the worst of all bad), macho, misogynist, homophobic, racist, elitist, anti-family, antiold, immoral, ...